Cargando…

Comparing different dosing regimens of bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab (Avastin®) is as effective as ranibizumab (Lucentis®) in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). However it has two important structural differences. First, it has two active sites instead of one; second, it retains the Fc portion of the antibody...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foss, Alexander JE, Childs, Margaret, Reeves, Barnaby C, Empeslidis, Theo, Tesha, Paul, Dhar-Munshi, Sushma, Mughal, Samah, Culliford, Lucy, Rogers, Chris A, Tan, Wei, Montgomery, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25873213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0608-2
_version_ 1782363747584573440
author Foss, Alexander JE
Childs, Margaret
Reeves, Barnaby C
Empeslidis, Theo
Tesha, Paul
Dhar-Munshi, Sushma
Mughal, Samah
Culliford, Lucy
Rogers, Chris A
Tan, Wei
Montgomery, Alan
author_facet Foss, Alexander JE
Childs, Margaret
Reeves, Barnaby C
Empeslidis, Theo
Tesha, Paul
Dhar-Munshi, Sushma
Mughal, Samah
Culliford, Lucy
Rogers, Chris A
Tan, Wei
Montgomery, Alan
author_sort Foss, Alexander JE
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab (Avastin®) is as effective as ranibizumab (Lucentis®) in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). However it has two important structural differences. First, it has two active sites instead of one; second, it retains the Fc portion of the antibody which would be expected to confer a significantly longer half-life. These agents have been associated with systemic complications including strokes, so it is desirable to use the smallest effective dose. Furthermore, the standard dosing regimen requires monthly hospital visits, which present a significant challenge both to the hospital services and to the patients (who are elderly). METHODS/DESIGN: Patients ≥50 years who are eligible for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment of nAMD in the NHS, who are either newly referred for treatment or have reactivation of nAMD and who have not received treatment to either eye for the previous six months. We have designed a factorial multi-centre masked randomised controlled trial using bevacizumab as the intervention, with patients randomised to one of four arms: to standard or low dose and to monthly or two-monthly patient review. The aim is to recruit sufficient patients (around 1,000) to obtain 304 patients meeting the endpoint over a four-year period. The primary endpoint is time to treatment failure to be analysed using Cox regression. DISCUSSION: This randomised control trial will show if half dose and two monthly as required is as effective as full dose and monthly regimes. A two monthly as required regimen of Bevacizumab would significantly reduce both the cost and the service delivery burden for the treatment of nAMD while a reduced dose would be expected to enhance the safety profile of this treatment regime. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN95654194, registered on 22 September 2009.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4376508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43765082015-03-28 Comparing different dosing regimens of bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Foss, Alexander JE Childs, Margaret Reeves, Barnaby C Empeslidis, Theo Tesha, Paul Dhar-Munshi, Sushma Mughal, Samah Culliford, Lucy Rogers, Chris A Tan, Wei Montgomery, Alan Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab (Avastin®) is as effective as ranibizumab (Lucentis®) in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). However it has two important structural differences. First, it has two active sites instead of one; second, it retains the Fc portion of the antibody which would be expected to confer a significantly longer half-life. These agents have been associated with systemic complications including strokes, so it is desirable to use the smallest effective dose. Furthermore, the standard dosing regimen requires monthly hospital visits, which present a significant challenge both to the hospital services and to the patients (who are elderly). METHODS/DESIGN: Patients ≥50 years who are eligible for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment of nAMD in the NHS, who are either newly referred for treatment or have reactivation of nAMD and who have not received treatment to either eye for the previous six months. We have designed a factorial multi-centre masked randomised controlled trial using bevacizumab as the intervention, with patients randomised to one of four arms: to standard or low dose and to monthly or two-monthly patient review. The aim is to recruit sufficient patients (around 1,000) to obtain 304 patients meeting the endpoint over a four-year period. The primary endpoint is time to treatment failure to be analysed using Cox regression. DISCUSSION: This randomised control trial will show if half dose and two monthly as required is as effective as full dose and monthly regimes. A two monthly as required regimen of Bevacizumab would significantly reduce both the cost and the service delivery burden for the treatment of nAMD while a reduced dose would be expected to enhance the safety profile of this treatment regime. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN95654194, registered on 22 September 2009. BioMed Central 2015-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4376508/ /pubmed/25873213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0608-2 Text en © Foss et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Foss, Alexander JE
Childs, Margaret
Reeves, Barnaby C
Empeslidis, Theo
Tesha, Paul
Dhar-Munshi, Sushma
Mughal, Samah
Culliford, Lucy
Rogers, Chris A
Tan, Wei
Montgomery, Alan
Comparing different dosing regimens of bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Comparing different dosing regimens of bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Comparing different dosing regimens of bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparing different dosing regimens of bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing different dosing regimens of bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Comparing different dosing regimens of bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort comparing different dosing regimens of bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25873213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0608-2
work_keys_str_mv AT fossalexanderje comparingdifferentdosingregimensofbevacizumabinthetreatmentofneovascularmaculardegenerationstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT childsmargaret comparingdifferentdosingregimensofbevacizumabinthetreatmentofneovascularmaculardegenerationstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT reevesbarnabyc comparingdifferentdosingregimensofbevacizumabinthetreatmentofneovascularmaculardegenerationstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT empeslidistheo comparingdifferentdosingregimensofbevacizumabinthetreatmentofneovascularmaculardegenerationstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT teshapaul comparingdifferentdosingregimensofbevacizumabinthetreatmentofneovascularmaculardegenerationstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dharmunshisushma comparingdifferentdosingregimensofbevacizumabinthetreatmentofneovascularmaculardegenerationstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mughalsamah comparingdifferentdosingregimensofbevacizumabinthetreatmentofneovascularmaculardegenerationstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cullifordlucy comparingdifferentdosingregimensofbevacizumabinthetreatmentofneovascularmaculardegenerationstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rogerschrisa comparingdifferentdosingregimensofbevacizumabinthetreatmentofneovascularmaculardegenerationstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tanwei comparingdifferentdosingregimensofbevacizumabinthetreatmentofneovascularmaculardegenerationstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT montgomeryalan comparingdifferentdosingregimensofbevacizumabinthetreatmentofneovascularmaculardegenerationstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial