Cargando…

Wound Edge Protectors in Open Abdominal Surgery to Reduce Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IMPORTANCE: Surgical site infections remain one of the most frequent complications following abdominal surgery and cause substantial costs, morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of wound edge protectors in open abdominal surgery in reducing surgical site infections. EVIDENC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mihaljevic, André L., Müller, Tara C., Kehl, Victoria, Friess, Helmut, Kleeff, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25816365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121187
_version_ 1782363759922118656
author Mihaljevic, André L.
Müller, Tara C.
Kehl, Victoria
Friess, Helmut
Kleeff, Jörg
author_facet Mihaljevic, André L.
Müller, Tara C.
Kehl, Victoria
Friess, Helmut
Kleeff, Jörg
author_sort Mihaljevic, André L.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Surgical site infections remain one of the most frequent complications following abdominal surgery and cause substantial costs, morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of wound edge protectors in open abdominal surgery in reducing surgical site infections. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic literature search was conducted according to a prespecified review protocol in a variety of data-bases combined with hand-searches for randomized controlled trials on wound edge protectors in patients undergoing laparotomy. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of included trials was conducted. FINDINGS: We identified 16 randomized controlled trials including 3695 patients investigating wound edge protectors published between 1972 and 2014. Critical appraisal uncovered a number of methodological flaws, predominantly in the older trials. Wound edge protectors significantly reduced the rate of surgical site infections (risk ratio 0.65; 95%CI, 0.51–0.83; p = 0.0007; I(2) = 52%). The results were robust in a number of sensitivity analyses. A similar effect size was found in the subgroup of patients undergoing colorectal surgery (risk ratio 0.65; 95%CI, 0.44–0.97; p = 0.04; I(2) = 56%). Of the two common types of wound protectors double ring devices were found to exhibit a greater protective effect (risk ratio 0.29; 95%CI, 0.15–0.55) than single-ring devices (risk ratio 0.71; 95%CI, 0.54–0.92), but this might largely be due to the lower quality of available data for double-ring devices. Exploratory subgroup analyses for the degree of contamination showed a larger protective effect in contaminated cases (0.44; 95%CI, 0.28–0.67; p = 0.0002, I(2) = 23%) than in clean-contaminated surgeries (0.72, 95%CI, 0.57–0.91; p = 0.005; I(2) = 46%) and a strong effect on the reduction of superficial surgical site infections (risk ratio 0.45; 95%CI, 0.24–0.82; p = 0.001; I(2) = 72%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Wound edge protectors significantly reduce the rate of surgical site infections in open abdominal surgery. Further trials are needed to explore their effectiveness in different risk constellations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4376627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43766272015-04-04 Wound Edge Protectors in Open Abdominal Surgery to Reduce Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Mihaljevic, André L. Müller, Tara C. Kehl, Victoria Friess, Helmut Kleeff, Jörg PLoS One Research Article IMPORTANCE: Surgical site infections remain one of the most frequent complications following abdominal surgery and cause substantial costs, morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of wound edge protectors in open abdominal surgery in reducing surgical site infections. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic literature search was conducted according to a prespecified review protocol in a variety of data-bases combined with hand-searches for randomized controlled trials on wound edge protectors in patients undergoing laparotomy. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of included trials was conducted. FINDINGS: We identified 16 randomized controlled trials including 3695 patients investigating wound edge protectors published between 1972 and 2014. Critical appraisal uncovered a number of methodological flaws, predominantly in the older trials. Wound edge protectors significantly reduced the rate of surgical site infections (risk ratio 0.65; 95%CI, 0.51–0.83; p = 0.0007; I(2) = 52%). The results were robust in a number of sensitivity analyses. A similar effect size was found in the subgroup of patients undergoing colorectal surgery (risk ratio 0.65; 95%CI, 0.44–0.97; p = 0.04; I(2) = 56%). Of the two common types of wound protectors double ring devices were found to exhibit a greater protective effect (risk ratio 0.29; 95%CI, 0.15–0.55) than single-ring devices (risk ratio 0.71; 95%CI, 0.54–0.92), but this might largely be due to the lower quality of available data for double-ring devices. Exploratory subgroup analyses for the degree of contamination showed a larger protective effect in contaminated cases (0.44; 95%CI, 0.28–0.67; p = 0.0002, I(2) = 23%) than in clean-contaminated surgeries (0.72, 95%CI, 0.57–0.91; p = 0.005; I(2) = 46%) and a strong effect on the reduction of superficial surgical site infections (risk ratio 0.45; 95%CI, 0.24–0.82; p = 0.001; I(2) = 72%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Wound edge protectors significantly reduce the rate of surgical site infections in open abdominal surgery. Further trials are needed to explore their effectiveness in different risk constellations. Public Library of Science 2015-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4376627/ /pubmed/25816365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121187 Text en © 2015 Mihaljevic et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mihaljevic, André L.
Müller, Tara C.
Kehl, Victoria
Friess, Helmut
Kleeff, Jörg
Wound Edge Protectors in Open Abdominal Surgery to Reduce Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Wound Edge Protectors in Open Abdominal Surgery to Reduce Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Wound Edge Protectors in Open Abdominal Surgery to Reduce Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Wound Edge Protectors in Open Abdominal Surgery to Reduce Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Wound Edge Protectors in Open Abdominal Surgery to Reduce Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Wound Edge Protectors in Open Abdominal Surgery to Reduce Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort wound edge protectors in open abdominal surgery to reduce surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25816365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121187
work_keys_str_mv AT mihaljevicandrel woundedgeprotectorsinopenabdominalsurgerytoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mullertarac woundedgeprotectorsinopenabdominalsurgerytoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kehlvictoria woundedgeprotectorsinopenabdominalsurgerytoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT friesshelmut woundedgeprotectorsinopenabdominalsurgerytoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kleeffjorg woundedgeprotectorsinopenabdominalsurgerytoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis