Cargando…

Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE: Important considerations for exercise trials in cancer patients are contamination and differential drop-out among the control group members that might jeopardize the internal validity. This systematic review provides an overview of different control groups design characteristics of exercise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steins Bisschop, Charlotte N., Courneya, Kerry S., Velthuis, Miranda J., Monninkhof, Evelyn M., Jones, Lee W., Friedenreich, Christine, van der Wall, Elsken, Peeters, Petra H. M., May, Anne M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120996
_version_ 1782363802777419776
author Steins Bisschop, Charlotte N.
Courneya, Kerry S.
Velthuis, Miranda J.
Monninkhof, Evelyn M.
Jones, Lee W.
Friedenreich, Christine
van der Wall, Elsken
Peeters, Petra H. M.
May, Anne M.
author_facet Steins Bisschop, Charlotte N.
Courneya, Kerry S.
Velthuis, Miranda J.
Monninkhof, Evelyn M.
Jones, Lee W.
Friedenreich, Christine
van der Wall, Elsken
Peeters, Petra H. M.
May, Anne M.
author_sort Steins Bisschop, Charlotte N.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Important considerations for exercise trials in cancer patients are contamination and differential drop-out among the control group members that might jeopardize the internal validity. This systematic review provides an overview of different control groups design characteristics of exercise-oncology trials and explores the association with contamination and drop-out rates. METHODS: Randomized controlled exercise-oncology trials from two Cochrane reviews were included. Additionally, a computer-aided search using Medline (Pubmed), Embase and CINAHL was conducted after completion date of the Cochrane reviews. Eligible studies were classified according to three control group design characteristics: the exercise instruction given to controls before start of the study (exercise allowed or not); and the intervention the control group was offered during (any (e.g., education sessions or telephone contacts) or none) or after (any (e.g., cross-over or exercise instruction) or none) the intervention period. Contamination (yes or no) and excess drop-out rates (i.e., drop-out rate of the control group minus the drop-out rate exercise group) were described according to the three design characteristics of the control group and according to the combinations of these three characteristics; so we additionally made subgroups based on combinations of type and timing of instructions received. RESULTS: 40 exercise-oncology trials were included based on pre-specified eligibility criteria. The lowest contamination (7.1% of studies) and low drop-out rates (excess drop-out rate -4.7±9.2) were found in control groups offered an intervention after the intervention period. When control groups were offered an intervention both during and after the intervention period, contamination (0%) and excess drop-out rates (-10.0±12.8%) were even lower. CONCLUSIONS: Control groups receiving an intervention during and after the study intervention period have lower contamination and drop-out rates. The present findings can be considered when designing future exercise-oncology trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4376879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43768792015-04-04 Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review Steins Bisschop, Charlotte N. Courneya, Kerry S. Velthuis, Miranda J. Monninkhof, Evelyn M. Jones, Lee W. Friedenreich, Christine van der Wall, Elsken Peeters, Petra H. M. May, Anne M. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Important considerations for exercise trials in cancer patients are contamination and differential drop-out among the control group members that might jeopardize the internal validity. This systematic review provides an overview of different control groups design characteristics of exercise-oncology trials and explores the association with contamination and drop-out rates. METHODS: Randomized controlled exercise-oncology trials from two Cochrane reviews were included. Additionally, a computer-aided search using Medline (Pubmed), Embase and CINAHL was conducted after completion date of the Cochrane reviews. Eligible studies were classified according to three control group design characteristics: the exercise instruction given to controls before start of the study (exercise allowed or not); and the intervention the control group was offered during (any (e.g., education sessions or telephone contacts) or none) or after (any (e.g., cross-over or exercise instruction) or none) the intervention period. Contamination (yes or no) and excess drop-out rates (i.e., drop-out rate of the control group minus the drop-out rate exercise group) were described according to the three design characteristics of the control group and according to the combinations of these three characteristics; so we additionally made subgroups based on combinations of type and timing of instructions received. RESULTS: 40 exercise-oncology trials were included based on pre-specified eligibility criteria. The lowest contamination (7.1% of studies) and low drop-out rates (excess drop-out rate -4.7±9.2) were found in control groups offered an intervention after the intervention period. When control groups were offered an intervention both during and after the intervention period, contamination (0%) and excess drop-out rates (-10.0±12.8%) were even lower. CONCLUSIONS: Control groups receiving an intervention during and after the study intervention period have lower contamination and drop-out rates. The present findings can be considered when designing future exercise-oncology trials. Public Library of Science 2015-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4376879/ /pubmed/25815479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120996 Text en © 2015 Steins Bisschop et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Steins Bisschop, Charlotte N.
Courneya, Kerry S.
Velthuis, Miranda J.
Monninkhof, Evelyn M.
Jones, Lee W.
Friedenreich, Christine
van der Wall, Elsken
Peeters, Petra H. M.
May, Anne M.
Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review
title Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review
title_full Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review
title_short Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review
title_sort control group design, contamination and drop-out in exercise oncology trials: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120996
work_keys_str_mv AT steinsbisschopcharlotten controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview
AT courneyakerrys controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview
AT velthuismirandaj controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview
AT monninkhofevelynm controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview
AT jonesleew controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview
AT friedenreichchristine controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview
AT vanderwallelsken controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview
AT peeterspetrahm controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview
AT mayannem controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview