Cargando…
Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review
PURPOSE: Important considerations for exercise trials in cancer patients are contamination and differential drop-out among the control group members that might jeopardize the internal validity. This systematic review provides an overview of different control groups design characteristics of exercise...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120996 |
_version_ | 1782363802777419776 |
---|---|
author | Steins Bisschop, Charlotte N. Courneya, Kerry S. Velthuis, Miranda J. Monninkhof, Evelyn M. Jones, Lee W. Friedenreich, Christine van der Wall, Elsken Peeters, Petra H. M. May, Anne M. |
author_facet | Steins Bisschop, Charlotte N. Courneya, Kerry S. Velthuis, Miranda J. Monninkhof, Evelyn M. Jones, Lee W. Friedenreich, Christine van der Wall, Elsken Peeters, Petra H. M. May, Anne M. |
author_sort | Steins Bisschop, Charlotte N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Important considerations for exercise trials in cancer patients are contamination and differential drop-out among the control group members that might jeopardize the internal validity. This systematic review provides an overview of different control groups design characteristics of exercise-oncology trials and explores the association with contamination and drop-out rates. METHODS: Randomized controlled exercise-oncology trials from two Cochrane reviews were included. Additionally, a computer-aided search using Medline (Pubmed), Embase and CINAHL was conducted after completion date of the Cochrane reviews. Eligible studies were classified according to three control group design characteristics: the exercise instruction given to controls before start of the study (exercise allowed or not); and the intervention the control group was offered during (any (e.g., education sessions or telephone contacts) or none) or after (any (e.g., cross-over or exercise instruction) or none) the intervention period. Contamination (yes or no) and excess drop-out rates (i.e., drop-out rate of the control group minus the drop-out rate exercise group) were described according to the three design characteristics of the control group and according to the combinations of these three characteristics; so we additionally made subgroups based on combinations of type and timing of instructions received. RESULTS: 40 exercise-oncology trials were included based on pre-specified eligibility criteria. The lowest contamination (7.1% of studies) and low drop-out rates (excess drop-out rate -4.7±9.2) were found in control groups offered an intervention after the intervention period. When control groups were offered an intervention both during and after the intervention period, contamination (0%) and excess drop-out rates (-10.0±12.8%) were even lower. CONCLUSIONS: Control groups receiving an intervention during and after the study intervention period have lower contamination and drop-out rates. The present findings can be considered when designing future exercise-oncology trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4376879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43768792015-04-04 Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review Steins Bisschop, Charlotte N. Courneya, Kerry S. Velthuis, Miranda J. Monninkhof, Evelyn M. Jones, Lee W. Friedenreich, Christine van der Wall, Elsken Peeters, Petra H. M. May, Anne M. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Important considerations for exercise trials in cancer patients are contamination and differential drop-out among the control group members that might jeopardize the internal validity. This systematic review provides an overview of different control groups design characteristics of exercise-oncology trials and explores the association with contamination and drop-out rates. METHODS: Randomized controlled exercise-oncology trials from two Cochrane reviews were included. Additionally, a computer-aided search using Medline (Pubmed), Embase and CINAHL was conducted after completion date of the Cochrane reviews. Eligible studies were classified according to three control group design characteristics: the exercise instruction given to controls before start of the study (exercise allowed or not); and the intervention the control group was offered during (any (e.g., education sessions or telephone contacts) or none) or after (any (e.g., cross-over or exercise instruction) or none) the intervention period. Contamination (yes or no) and excess drop-out rates (i.e., drop-out rate of the control group minus the drop-out rate exercise group) were described according to the three design characteristics of the control group and according to the combinations of these three characteristics; so we additionally made subgroups based on combinations of type and timing of instructions received. RESULTS: 40 exercise-oncology trials were included based on pre-specified eligibility criteria. The lowest contamination (7.1% of studies) and low drop-out rates (excess drop-out rate -4.7±9.2) were found in control groups offered an intervention after the intervention period. When control groups were offered an intervention both during and after the intervention period, contamination (0%) and excess drop-out rates (-10.0±12.8%) were even lower. CONCLUSIONS: Control groups receiving an intervention during and after the study intervention period have lower contamination and drop-out rates. The present findings can be considered when designing future exercise-oncology trials. Public Library of Science 2015-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4376879/ /pubmed/25815479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120996 Text en © 2015 Steins Bisschop et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Steins Bisschop, Charlotte N. Courneya, Kerry S. Velthuis, Miranda J. Monninkhof, Evelyn M. Jones, Lee W. Friedenreich, Christine van der Wall, Elsken Peeters, Petra H. M. May, Anne M. Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review |
title | Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | control group design, contamination and drop-out in exercise oncology trials: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120996 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steinsbisschopcharlotten controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview AT courneyakerrys controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview AT velthuismirandaj controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview AT monninkhofevelynm controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview AT jonesleew controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview AT friedenreichchristine controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview AT vanderwallelsken controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview AT peeterspetrahm controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview AT mayannem controlgroupdesigncontaminationanddropoutinexerciseoncologytrialsasystematicreview |