Cargando…
The geko™ Electro-Stimulation Device for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance
The geko™ device is a single-use, battery-powered, neuromuscular electrostimulation device that aims to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) selected the geko™ device for evaluation, and invited the manufacturer, Firstkind Ltd,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25403719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-014-0139-0 |
_version_ | 1782363819490672640 |
---|---|
author | Summers, Jennifer A. Clinch, James Radhakrishnan, Muralikrishnan Healy, Andy McMillan, Viktoria Morris, Elizabeth Rua, Tiago Ofuya, Mercy Wang, Yanzhong Dimmock, Paul W. Lewis, Cornelius Peacock, Janet L. Keevil, Stephen F. |
author_facet | Summers, Jennifer A. Clinch, James Radhakrishnan, Muralikrishnan Healy, Andy McMillan, Viktoria Morris, Elizabeth Rua, Tiago Ofuya, Mercy Wang, Yanzhong Dimmock, Paul W. Lewis, Cornelius Peacock, Janet L. Keevil, Stephen F. |
author_sort | Summers, Jennifer A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The geko™ device is a single-use, battery-powered, neuromuscular electrostimulation device that aims to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) selected the geko™ device for evaluation, and invited the manufacturer, Firstkind Ltd, to submit clinical and economic evidence. King’s Technology Evaluation Centre, an External Assessment Centre (EAC) commissioned by the NICE, independently assessed the evidence submitted. The sponsor submitted evidence related to the geko™ device and, in addition, included studies of other related devices as further clinical evidence to support a link between increased blood flow and VTE prophylaxis. The EAC assessed this evidence, conducted its own systematic review and concluded that there is currently limited direct evidence that geko™ prevents VTE. The sponsor’s cost model is based on the assumption that patients with an underlying VTE risk and subsequently treated with geko™ will experience a reduction in their baseline risk. The EAC assessed this cost model but questioned the validity of some model assumptions. Using the EACs revised cost model, the cost savings for geko™ prophylaxis against a ‘no prophylaxis’ strategy were estimated as £197 per patient. Following a second public consultation, taking into account a change in the original draft recommendations, the NICE medical technologies guidance MTG19 was issued in June 2014. This recommended the adoption of the geko™ for use in people with a high risk of VTE and when other mechanical/pharmacological methods of prophylaxis are impractical or contraindicated in selected patients within the National Health Service in England. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4376951 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43769512015-03-31 The geko™ Electro-Stimulation Device for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance Summers, Jennifer A. Clinch, James Radhakrishnan, Muralikrishnan Healy, Andy McMillan, Viktoria Morris, Elizabeth Rua, Tiago Ofuya, Mercy Wang, Yanzhong Dimmock, Paul W. Lewis, Cornelius Peacock, Janet L. Keevil, Stephen F. Appl Health Econ Health Policy Review Article The geko™ device is a single-use, battery-powered, neuromuscular electrostimulation device that aims to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) selected the geko™ device for evaluation, and invited the manufacturer, Firstkind Ltd, to submit clinical and economic evidence. King’s Technology Evaluation Centre, an External Assessment Centre (EAC) commissioned by the NICE, independently assessed the evidence submitted. The sponsor submitted evidence related to the geko™ device and, in addition, included studies of other related devices as further clinical evidence to support a link between increased blood flow and VTE prophylaxis. The EAC assessed this evidence, conducted its own systematic review and concluded that there is currently limited direct evidence that geko™ prevents VTE. The sponsor’s cost model is based on the assumption that patients with an underlying VTE risk and subsequently treated with geko™ will experience a reduction in their baseline risk. The EAC assessed this cost model but questioned the validity of some model assumptions. Using the EACs revised cost model, the cost savings for geko™ prophylaxis against a ‘no prophylaxis’ strategy were estimated as £197 per patient. Following a second public consultation, taking into account a change in the original draft recommendations, the NICE medical technologies guidance MTG19 was issued in June 2014. This recommended the adoption of the geko™ for use in people with a high risk of VTE and when other mechanical/pharmacological methods of prophylaxis are impractical or contraindicated in selected patients within the National Health Service in England. Springer International Publishing 2014-11-18 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4376951/ /pubmed/25403719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-014-0139-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Summers, Jennifer A. Clinch, James Radhakrishnan, Muralikrishnan Healy, Andy McMillan, Viktoria Morris, Elizabeth Rua, Tiago Ofuya, Mercy Wang, Yanzhong Dimmock, Paul W. Lewis, Cornelius Peacock, Janet L. Keevil, Stephen F. The geko™ Electro-Stimulation Device for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance |
title | The geko™ Electro-Stimulation Device for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance |
title_full | The geko™ Electro-Stimulation Device for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance |
title_fullStr | The geko™ Electro-Stimulation Device for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance |
title_full_unstemmed | The geko™ Electro-Stimulation Device for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance |
title_short | The geko™ Electro-Stimulation Device for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance |
title_sort | geko™ electro-stimulation device for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a nice medical technology guidance |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25403719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-014-0139-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT summersjennifera thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT clinchjames thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT radhakrishnanmuralikrishnan thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT healyandy thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT mcmillanviktoria thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT morriselizabeth thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT ruatiago thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT ofuyamercy thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT wangyanzhong thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT dimmockpaulw thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT lewiscornelius thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT peacockjanetl thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT keevilstephenf thegekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT summersjennifera gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT clinchjames gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT radhakrishnanmuralikrishnan gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT healyandy gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT mcmillanviktoria gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT morriselizabeth gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT ruatiago gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT ofuyamercy gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT wangyanzhong gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT dimmockpaulw gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT lewiscornelius gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT peacockjanetl gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT keevilstephenf gekoelectrostimulationdeviceforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisanicemedicaltechnologyguidance |