Cargando…
Influence of mouse strain on ovarian tissue recovery after engraftment with angiogenic factor
BACKGROUND: For women facing gonadotoxic treatment, cryopreservation of ovarian tissue with subsequent retransplantation during remission is a promising technique for fertility preservation. However, follicle loss within grafted ovarian tissue can be caused by ischemia and progressive revascularizat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25824856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-015-0142-6 |
_version_ | 1782363842035056640 |
---|---|
author | Fransolet, Maïté Henry, Laurie Labied, Soraya Masereel, Marie-Caroline Blacher, Silvia Noël, Agnès Foidart, Jean-Michel Nisolle, Michelle Munaut, Carine |
author_facet | Fransolet, Maïté Henry, Laurie Labied, Soraya Masereel, Marie-Caroline Blacher, Silvia Noël, Agnès Foidart, Jean-Michel Nisolle, Michelle Munaut, Carine |
author_sort | Fransolet, Maïté |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For women facing gonadotoxic treatment, cryopreservation of ovarian tissue with subsequent retransplantation during remission is a promising technique for fertility preservation. However, follicle loss within grafted ovarian tissue can be caused by ischemia and progressive revascularization. Several xenograft models using different immunodeficient rodent lines are suitable for studying ovarian tissue survival and follicular viability after frozen-thawed ovarian cortex transplantation. SCID mice, which are deficient for functional B and T cells, are the most commonly used mice for ovarian xenograft studies. However, due to incomplete immunosuppression, NOD-SCID mice displaying low NK cell function and an absence of circulating complement might be more appropriate. The present study aims to define the most appropriate immunodeficient mouse strain for ovarian tissue xenotransplantation by comparing ovarian graft recovery in SCID and NOD-SCID mice following engraftment in the presence of isoform 111 of vascular endothelial growth factor. METHODS: Sheep ovarian cortex fragments were embedded in a collagen matrix, with or without VEGF(111), before being stitched onto the ovaries of SCID and NOD-SCID mice. Transplants were recovered after 3 days to study early revascularization or after 3 weeks to evaluate follicle preservation and tissue fibrosis through histological analyses. RESULTS: At day 3, vessels were largely reorganized in the ovarian grafts of both mouse strains. After 3 weeks, the cortical tissue was clearly identifiable in SCID mice but not in NOD-SCID mice. Upon VEGF(111) treatment, vascularization was significantly improved 3 days after transplantation in SCID mice. This increase in vessel density was correlated with better follicular preservation in SCID mice 3 weeks after transplantation. Fibrosis was not decreased by VEGF treatment in either mouse strain. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue architecture and follicular morphology were better preserved in ovarian tissues grafted in SCID mice in comparison with NOD-SCID mice. Moreover, tissue revascularization was improved in SCID mice by VEGF(111) graft treatment. Thus, we consider SCID mice to be the best murine model for studying ovarian tissue xenografts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4377049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43770492015-03-29 Influence of mouse strain on ovarian tissue recovery after engraftment with angiogenic factor Fransolet, Maïté Henry, Laurie Labied, Soraya Masereel, Marie-Caroline Blacher, Silvia Noël, Agnès Foidart, Jean-Michel Nisolle, Michelle Munaut, Carine J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: For women facing gonadotoxic treatment, cryopreservation of ovarian tissue with subsequent retransplantation during remission is a promising technique for fertility preservation. However, follicle loss within grafted ovarian tissue can be caused by ischemia and progressive revascularization. Several xenograft models using different immunodeficient rodent lines are suitable for studying ovarian tissue survival and follicular viability after frozen-thawed ovarian cortex transplantation. SCID mice, which are deficient for functional B and T cells, are the most commonly used mice for ovarian xenograft studies. However, due to incomplete immunosuppression, NOD-SCID mice displaying low NK cell function and an absence of circulating complement might be more appropriate. The present study aims to define the most appropriate immunodeficient mouse strain for ovarian tissue xenotransplantation by comparing ovarian graft recovery in SCID and NOD-SCID mice following engraftment in the presence of isoform 111 of vascular endothelial growth factor. METHODS: Sheep ovarian cortex fragments were embedded in a collagen matrix, with or without VEGF(111), before being stitched onto the ovaries of SCID and NOD-SCID mice. Transplants were recovered after 3 days to study early revascularization or after 3 weeks to evaluate follicle preservation and tissue fibrosis through histological analyses. RESULTS: At day 3, vessels were largely reorganized in the ovarian grafts of both mouse strains. After 3 weeks, the cortical tissue was clearly identifiable in SCID mice but not in NOD-SCID mice. Upon VEGF(111) treatment, vascularization was significantly improved 3 days after transplantation in SCID mice. This increase in vessel density was correlated with better follicular preservation in SCID mice 3 weeks after transplantation. Fibrosis was not decreased by VEGF treatment in either mouse strain. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue architecture and follicular morphology were better preserved in ovarian tissues grafted in SCID mice in comparison with NOD-SCID mice. Moreover, tissue revascularization was improved in SCID mice by VEGF(111) graft treatment. Thus, we consider SCID mice to be the best murine model for studying ovarian tissue xenografts. BioMed Central 2015-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4377049/ /pubmed/25824856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-015-0142-6 Text en © Fransolet et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Fransolet, Maïté Henry, Laurie Labied, Soraya Masereel, Marie-Caroline Blacher, Silvia Noël, Agnès Foidart, Jean-Michel Nisolle, Michelle Munaut, Carine Influence of mouse strain on ovarian tissue recovery after engraftment with angiogenic factor |
title | Influence of mouse strain on ovarian tissue recovery after engraftment with angiogenic factor |
title_full | Influence of mouse strain on ovarian tissue recovery after engraftment with angiogenic factor |
title_fullStr | Influence of mouse strain on ovarian tissue recovery after engraftment with angiogenic factor |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of mouse strain on ovarian tissue recovery after engraftment with angiogenic factor |
title_short | Influence of mouse strain on ovarian tissue recovery after engraftment with angiogenic factor |
title_sort | influence of mouse strain on ovarian tissue recovery after engraftment with angiogenic factor |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25824856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-015-0142-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fransoletmaite influenceofmousestrainonovariantissuerecoveryafterengraftmentwithangiogenicfactor AT henrylaurie influenceofmousestrainonovariantissuerecoveryafterengraftmentwithangiogenicfactor AT labiedsoraya influenceofmousestrainonovariantissuerecoveryafterengraftmentwithangiogenicfactor AT masereelmariecaroline influenceofmousestrainonovariantissuerecoveryafterengraftmentwithangiogenicfactor AT blachersilvia influenceofmousestrainonovariantissuerecoveryafterengraftmentwithangiogenicfactor AT noelagnes influenceofmousestrainonovariantissuerecoveryafterengraftmentwithangiogenicfactor AT foidartjeanmichel influenceofmousestrainonovariantissuerecoveryafterengraftmentwithangiogenicfactor AT nisollemichelle influenceofmousestrainonovariantissuerecoveryafterengraftmentwithangiogenicfactor AT munautcarine influenceofmousestrainonovariantissuerecoveryafterengraftmentwithangiogenicfactor |