A Spectro Photometric Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Ability of Three Different Sealers; Calcium Hydroxide Based, Resin Based and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Based Sealers

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the amount of dye leakage with AH26, Sealapex and Tubliseal sealers in endodonticaly treated teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 extracted mandibular molar specimens were divided into three groups; Group I: Sealapex, Group II: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shetty, Vikram, Hegde, Prashant, Chauhan, Rashmi Singh, Chaurasia, Vishwajit Rampratap, Sharma, Akanksha Manmohan, Taranath, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015
Materias:
Original Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25859102
_version_ 1782363853421543424
author Shetty, Vikram
Hegde, Prashant
Chauhan, Rashmi Singh
Chaurasia, Vishwajit Rampratap
Sharma, Akanksha Manmohan
Taranath, M
author_facet Shetty, Vikram
Hegde, Prashant
Chauhan, Rashmi Singh
Chaurasia, Vishwajit Rampratap
Sharma, Akanksha Manmohan
Taranath, M
author_sort Shetty, Vikram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the amount of dye leakage with AH26, Sealapex and Tubliseal sealers in endodonticaly treated teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 extracted mandibular molar specimens were divided into three groups; Group I: Sealapex, Group II: Tubliseal, Group II: AH26 with 12 samples in each group. Standard access cavity and biomechanical preparation was done with step back flare technique. Obturations were done using respective sealers in the three different groups. Then, samples were subjected to spectro photometric analysis using a filter of 670 nm. Spectrophotometric analysis was performed to quantitatively analyze the amount of dye leakage with all three sealers. RESULTS: Tubliseal exhibited the least microleakage. In comparison to Sealapex, Tubliseal showed a significant difference. Compared to Sealapex, AH26 showed no significant difference. Comparisons made between Tubliseal and AH26 showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: In the present study, Tubliseal sealer showed least microleage compared with Sealapex and AH26 sealer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4377145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43771452015-04-09 A Spectro Photometric Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Ability of Three Different Sealers; Calcium Hydroxide Based, Resin Based and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Based Sealers Shetty, Vikram Hegde, Prashant Chauhan, Rashmi Singh Chaurasia, Vishwajit Rampratap Sharma, Akanksha Manmohan Taranath, M J Int Oral Health Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the amount of dye leakage with AH26, Sealapex and Tubliseal sealers in endodonticaly treated teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 extracted mandibular molar specimens were divided into three groups; Group I: Sealapex, Group II: Tubliseal, Group II: AH26 with 12 samples in each group. Standard access cavity and biomechanical preparation was done with step back flare technique. Obturations were done using respective sealers in the three different groups. Then, samples were subjected to spectro photometric analysis using a filter of 670 nm. Spectrophotometric analysis was performed to quantitatively analyze the amount of dye leakage with all three sealers. RESULTS: Tubliseal exhibited the least microleakage. In comparison to Sealapex, Tubliseal showed a significant difference. Compared to Sealapex, AH26 showed no significant difference. Comparisons made between Tubliseal and AH26 showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: In the present study, Tubliseal sealer showed least microleage compared with Sealapex and AH26 sealer. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4377145/ /pubmed/25859102 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shetty, Vikram
Hegde, Prashant
Chauhan, Rashmi Singh
Chaurasia, Vishwajit Rampratap
Sharma, Akanksha Manmohan
Taranath, M
A Spectro Photometric Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Ability of Three Different Sealers; Calcium Hydroxide Based, Resin Based and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Based Sealers
title A Spectro Photometric Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Ability of Three Different Sealers; Calcium Hydroxide Based, Resin Based and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Based Sealers
title_full A Spectro Photometric Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Ability of Three Different Sealers; Calcium Hydroxide Based, Resin Based and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Based Sealers
title_fullStr A Spectro Photometric Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Ability of Three Different Sealers; Calcium Hydroxide Based, Resin Based and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Based Sealers
title_full_unstemmed A Spectro Photometric Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Ability of Three Different Sealers; Calcium Hydroxide Based, Resin Based and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Based Sealers
title_short A Spectro Photometric Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Ability of Three Different Sealers; Calcium Hydroxide Based, Resin Based and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Based Sealers
title_sort spectro photometric comparative evaluation of apical sealing ability of three different sealers; calcium hydroxide based, resin based and zinc oxide eugenol based sealers
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25859102
work_keys_str_mv AT shettyvikram aspectrophotometriccomparativeevaluationofapicalsealingabilityofthreedifferentsealerscalciumhydroxidebasedresinbasedandzincoxideeugenolbasedsealers
AT hegdeprashant aspectrophotometriccomparativeevaluationofapicalsealingabilityofthreedifferentsealerscalciumhydroxidebasedresinbasedandzincoxideeugenolbasedsealers
AT chauhanrashmisingh aspectrophotometriccomparativeevaluationofapicalsealingabilityofthreedifferentsealerscalciumhydroxidebasedresinbasedandzincoxideeugenolbasedsealers
AT chaurasiavishwajitrampratap aspectrophotometriccomparativeevaluationofapicalsealingabilityofthreedifferentsealerscalciumhydroxidebasedresinbasedandzincoxideeugenolbasedsealers
AT sharmaakankshamanmohan aspectrophotometriccomparativeevaluationofapicalsealingabilityofthreedifferentsealerscalciumhydroxidebasedresinbasedandzincoxideeugenolbasedsealers
AT taranathm aspectrophotometriccomparativeevaluationofapicalsealingabilityofthreedifferentsealerscalciumhydroxidebasedresinbasedandzincoxideeugenolbasedsealers
AT shettyvikram spectrophotometriccomparativeevaluationofapicalsealingabilityofthreedifferentsealerscalciumhydroxidebasedresinbasedandzincoxideeugenolbasedsealers
AT hegdeprashant spectrophotometriccomparativeevaluationofapicalsealingabilityofthreedifferentsealerscalciumhydroxidebasedresinbasedandzincoxideeugenolbasedsealers
AT chauhanrashmisingh spectrophotometriccomparativeevaluationofapicalsealingabilityofthreedifferentsealerscalciumhydroxidebasedresinbasedandzincoxideeugenolbasedsealers
AT chaurasiavishwajitrampratap spectrophotometriccomparativeevaluationofapicalsealingabilityofthreedifferentsealerscalciumhydroxidebasedresinbasedandzincoxideeugenolbasedsealers
AT sharmaakankshamanmohan spectrophotometriccomparativeevaluationofapicalsealingabilityofthreedifferentsealerscalciumhydroxidebasedresinbasedandzincoxideeugenolbasedsealers
AT taranathm spectrophotometriccomparativeevaluationofapicalsealingabilityofthreedifferentsealerscalciumhydroxidebasedresinbasedandzincoxideeugenolbasedsealers

Ejemplares similares