Cargando…

Barriers to adherence with tuberculosis contact investigation in six provinces of Vietnam: a nested case–control study

BACKGROUND: Close contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB) have a substantial risk of developing the disease, particularly during the first year after exposure. Household contact investigation has recently been recommended as a strategy to enhance case detection in high-burden countries. However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fox, Gregory James, Loan, Le Phuong, Nhung, Nguyen Viet, Loi, Nguyen Thi, Sy, Dinh Ngoc, Britton, Warwick John, Marks, Guy Barrington
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0816-0
_version_ 1782363868154036224
author Fox, Gregory James
Loan, Le Phuong
Nhung, Nguyen Viet
Loi, Nguyen Thi
Sy, Dinh Ngoc
Britton, Warwick John
Marks, Guy Barrington
author_facet Fox, Gregory James
Loan, Le Phuong
Nhung, Nguyen Viet
Loi, Nguyen Thi
Sy, Dinh Ngoc
Britton, Warwick John
Marks, Guy Barrington
author_sort Fox, Gregory James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Close contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB) have a substantial risk of developing the disease, particularly during the first year after exposure. Household contact investigation has recently been recommended as a strategy to enhance case detection in high-burden countries. However the barriers to its implementation in these settings remain poorly understood. METHODS: A nested case–control study was conducted in Vietnam within the context of a large cluster randomised controlled trial of active screening for TB in household contacts of patients with pulmonary TB. The study population comprised contacts (and their index patients) from 12 Districts in six provinces throughout the country. Cases were contacts (and their index patients) that did not attend the scheduled screening appointment. Controls were those who did attend. We assessed relevant knowledge, attitudes and practices in cases and controls. RESULTS: The acceptability of contact investigation was high among both cases (n = 109) and controls (n = 194). Both cases (47%) and controls (36%) commonly reported discrimination against people with TB. Cases were less likely than controls to understand that sharing sleeping quarters with a TB patient increased their risk of disease (OR 0.46, 0.27 – 0.78) or recognise TB as an infectious disease (OR 0.65, 0.39 – 1.08). A higher proportion of cases than controls held the mistaken traditional belief that a non-infectious form of TB caused the disease (OR 1.69, 1.02 – 2.78). CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge, attitudes and practices of contacts and TB patients influence their ongoing participation in contact investigation. TB case detection policies in high-prevalence settings can be strengthened by systematically evaluating and addressing locally important barriers to attendance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12610000600044. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-0816-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4377211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43772112015-03-30 Barriers to adherence with tuberculosis contact investigation in six provinces of Vietnam: a nested case–control study Fox, Gregory James Loan, Le Phuong Nhung, Nguyen Viet Loi, Nguyen Thi Sy, Dinh Ngoc Britton, Warwick John Marks, Guy Barrington BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Close contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB) have a substantial risk of developing the disease, particularly during the first year after exposure. Household contact investigation has recently been recommended as a strategy to enhance case detection in high-burden countries. However the barriers to its implementation in these settings remain poorly understood. METHODS: A nested case–control study was conducted in Vietnam within the context of a large cluster randomised controlled trial of active screening for TB in household contacts of patients with pulmonary TB. The study population comprised contacts (and their index patients) from 12 Districts in six provinces throughout the country. Cases were contacts (and their index patients) that did not attend the scheduled screening appointment. Controls were those who did attend. We assessed relevant knowledge, attitudes and practices in cases and controls. RESULTS: The acceptability of contact investigation was high among both cases (n = 109) and controls (n = 194). Both cases (47%) and controls (36%) commonly reported discrimination against people with TB. Cases were less likely than controls to understand that sharing sleeping quarters with a TB patient increased their risk of disease (OR 0.46, 0.27 – 0.78) or recognise TB as an infectious disease (OR 0.65, 0.39 – 1.08). A higher proportion of cases than controls held the mistaken traditional belief that a non-infectious form of TB caused the disease (OR 1.69, 1.02 – 2.78). CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge, attitudes and practices of contacts and TB patients influence their ongoing participation in contact investigation. TB case detection policies in high-prevalence settings can be strengthened by systematically evaluating and addressing locally important barriers to attendance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12610000600044. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-0816-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4377211/ /pubmed/25886411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0816-0 Text en © Fox et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fox, Gregory James
Loan, Le Phuong
Nhung, Nguyen Viet
Loi, Nguyen Thi
Sy, Dinh Ngoc
Britton, Warwick John
Marks, Guy Barrington
Barriers to adherence with tuberculosis contact investigation in six provinces of Vietnam: a nested case–control study
title Barriers to adherence with tuberculosis contact investigation in six provinces of Vietnam: a nested case–control study
title_full Barriers to adherence with tuberculosis contact investigation in six provinces of Vietnam: a nested case–control study
title_fullStr Barriers to adherence with tuberculosis contact investigation in six provinces of Vietnam: a nested case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to adherence with tuberculosis contact investigation in six provinces of Vietnam: a nested case–control study
title_short Barriers to adherence with tuberculosis contact investigation in six provinces of Vietnam: a nested case–control study
title_sort barriers to adherence with tuberculosis contact investigation in six provinces of vietnam: a nested case–control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0816-0
work_keys_str_mv AT foxgregoryjames barrierstoadherencewithtuberculosiscontactinvestigationinsixprovincesofvietnamanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT loanlephuong barrierstoadherencewithtuberculosiscontactinvestigationinsixprovincesofvietnamanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT nhungnguyenviet barrierstoadherencewithtuberculosiscontactinvestigationinsixprovincesofvietnamanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT loinguyenthi barrierstoadherencewithtuberculosiscontactinvestigationinsixprovincesofvietnamanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT sydinhngoc barrierstoadherencewithtuberculosiscontactinvestigationinsixprovincesofvietnamanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT brittonwarwickjohn barrierstoadherencewithtuberculosiscontactinvestigationinsixprovincesofvietnamanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT marksguybarrington barrierstoadherencewithtuberculosiscontactinvestigationinsixprovincesofvietnamanestedcasecontrolstudy