Cargando…

Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory

This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the FOCI (FOCI-T), which is a brief self-report questionnaire to assess the symptoms and severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Forty-seven OCD patients completed the FOCI-T, the Patient Health Questionnaire (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saipanish, Ratana, Hiranyatheb, Thanita, Lotrakul, Manote
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/240787
_version_ 1782363915266555904
author Saipanish, Ratana
Hiranyatheb, Thanita
Lotrakul, Manote
author_facet Saipanish, Ratana
Hiranyatheb, Thanita
Lotrakul, Manote
author_sort Saipanish, Ratana
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the FOCI (FOCI-T), which is a brief self-report questionnaire to assess the symptoms and severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Forty-seven OCD patients completed the FOCI-T, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Pictorial Thai Quality of Life (PTQL). They were then interviewed to determine the OCD symptom severity by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Second Edition (YBOCS-II) and depressive symptoms by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), together with the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scales (CGI-S). The result showed that the FOCI-T had satisfactory internal consistency reliability on both the Symptom Checklist (KR-20 = 0.86) and the Severity Scale (α = 0.92). Regarding validity analyses, the FOCI-T Severity Scale had stronger correlations with the YBOCS-II and CGI-S than the FOCI-T Symptom Checklist. This implied the independence between the FOCI-T Symptom Checklist and the Severity Scale and good concurrent validity of the FOCI-T Severity Scale. Our results suggested that the FOCI-T was found to be a reliable and valid self-report measure to assess obsessive-compulsive symptoms and severity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4377463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43774632015-04-08 Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory Saipanish, Ratana Hiranyatheb, Thanita Lotrakul, Manote ScientificWorldJournal Research Article This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the FOCI (FOCI-T), which is a brief self-report questionnaire to assess the symptoms and severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Forty-seven OCD patients completed the FOCI-T, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Pictorial Thai Quality of Life (PTQL). They were then interviewed to determine the OCD symptom severity by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Second Edition (YBOCS-II) and depressive symptoms by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), together with the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scales (CGI-S). The result showed that the FOCI-T had satisfactory internal consistency reliability on both the Symptom Checklist (KR-20 = 0.86) and the Severity Scale (α = 0.92). Regarding validity analyses, the FOCI-T Severity Scale had stronger correlations with the YBOCS-II and CGI-S than the FOCI-T Symptom Checklist. This implied the independence between the FOCI-T Symptom Checklist and the Severity Scale and good concurrent validity of the FOCI-T Severity Scale. Our results suggested that the FOCI-T was found to be a reliable and valid self-report measure to assess obsessive-compulsive symptoms and severity. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4377463/ /pubmed/25861673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/240787 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ratana Saipanish et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saipanish, Ratana
Hiranyatheb, Thanita
Lotrakul, Manote
Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory
title Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory
title_full Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory
title_short Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory
title_sort reliability and validity of the thai version of the florida obsessive-compulsive inventory
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/240787
work_keys_str_mv AT saipanishratana reliabilityandvalidityofthethaiversionofthefloridaobsessivecompulsiveinventory
AT hiranyathebthanita reliabilityandvalidityofthethaiversionofthefloridaobsessivecompulsiveinventory
AT lotrakulmanote reliabilityandvalidityofthethaiversionofthefloridaobsessivecompulsiveinventory