Cargando…
Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory
This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the FOCI (FOCI-T), which is a brief self-report questionnaire to assess the symptoms and severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Forty-seven OCD patients completed the FOCI-T, the Patient Health Questionnaire (P...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/240787 |
_version_ | 1782363915266555904 |
---|---|
author | Saipanish, Ratana Hiranyatheb, Thanita Lotrakul, Manote |
author_facet | Saipanish, Ratana Hiranyatheb, Thanita Lotrakul, Manote |
author_sort | Saipanish, Ratana |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the FOCI (FOCI-T), which is a brief self-report questionnaire to assess the symptoms and severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Forty-seven OCD patients completed the FOCI-T, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Pictorial Thai Quality of Life (PTQL). They were then interviewed to determine the OCD symptom severity by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Second Edition (YBOCS-II) and depressive symptoms by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), together with the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scales (CGI-S). The result showed that the FOCI-T had satisfactory internal consistency reliability on both the Symptom Checklist (KR-20 = 0.86) and the Severity Scale (α = 0.92). Regarding validity analyses, the FOCI-T Severity Scale had stronger correlations with the YBOCS-II and CGI-S than the FOCI-T Symptom Checklist. This implied the independence between the FOCI-T Symptom Checklist and the Severity Scale and good concurrent validity of the FOCI-T Severity Scale. Our results suggested that the FOCI-T was found to be a reliable and valid self-report measure to assess obsessive-compulsive symptoms and severity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4377463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43774632015-04-08 Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory Saipanish, Ratana Hiranyatheb, Thanita Lotrakul, Manote ScientificWorldJournal Research Article This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the FOCI (FOCI-T), which is a brief self-report questionnaire to assess the symptoms and severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Forty-seven OCD patients completed the FOCI-T, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Pictorial Thai Quality of Life (PTQL). They were then interviewed to determine the OCD symptom severity by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Second Edition (YBOCS-II) and depressive symptoms by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), together with the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scales (CGI-S). The result showed that the FOCI-T had satisfactory internal consistency reliability on both the Symptom Checklist (KR-20 = 0.86) and the Severity Scale (α = 0.92). Regarding validity analyses, the FOCI-T Severity Scale had stronger correlations with the YBOCS-II and CGI-S than the FOCI-T Symptom Checklist. This implied the independence between the FOCI-T Symptom Checklist and the Severity Scale and good concurrent validity of the FOCI-T Severity Scale. Our results suggested that the FOCI-T was found to be a reliable and valid self-report measure to assess obsessive-compulsive symptoms and severity. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4377463/ /pubmed/25861673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/240787 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ratana Saipanish et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Saipanish, Ratana Hiranyatheb, Thanita Lotrakul, Manote Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory |
title | Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory |
title_full | Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory |
title_short | Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the thai version of the florida obsessive-compulsive inventory |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/240787 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saipanishratana reliabilityandvalidityofthethaiversionofthefloridaobsessivecompulsiveinventory AT hiranyathebthanita reliabilityandvalidityofthethaiversionofthefloridaobsessivecompulsiveinventory AT lotrakulmanote reliabilityandvalidityofthethaiversionofthefloridaobsessivecompulsiveinventory |