Cargando…

Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials

Purpose. The addition of cetuximab to radiochemotherapy (RCT) failed to improve complete response rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We report the long-term results in patients treated within two sequential clinical trials. Methods. Patients receiving neoadjuvant RCT using capecitabine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kripp, M., Horisberger, K., Mai, S., Kienle, P., Gaiser, T., Post, S., Wenz, F., Merx, K., Hofheinz, R.-D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/273489
_version_ 1782363917784186880
author Kripp, M.
Horisberger, K.
Mai, S.
Kienle, P.
Gaiser, T.
Post, S.
Wenz, F.
Merx, K.
Hofheinz, R.-D.
author_facet Kripp, M.
Horisberger, K.
Mai, S.
Kienle, P.
Gaiser, T.
Post, S.
Wenz, F.
Merx, K.
Hofheinz, R.-D.
author_sort Kripp, M.
collection PubMed
description Purpose. The addition of cetuximab to radiochemotherapy (RCT) failed to improve complete response rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We report the long-term results in patients treated within two sequential clinical trials. Methods. Patients receiving neoadjuvant RCT using capecitabine and irinotecan (CapIri) within a phase I/II trial or CapIri + cetuximab within a phase II trial were evaluated for analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). KRAS exon 2 mutational status had been analyzed in patients receiving cetuximab. Results. 37 patients from the CapIri trial and 49 patients from the CapIri-cetuximab treatment group were evaluable. Median follow-up time was 75.2 months. The 5-year DFS rate was 82% (CapIri) and 79% (CapIri-cetuximab) (P = 0.62). The median OS was 127.4 months. 5-year OS was 73% for both groups (CapIri and CapIri-cetuximab) (P = 0.61). No significant difference in DFS (P = 0.86) or OS (P = 0.39) was noticed between patients receiving CapIri and those receiving CapIri-cetuximab with KRAS wild-type tumors. Conclusions. As the addition of cetuximab did not improve neither DFS nor OS it should not play a role in the perioperative treatment of patients with LARC, not even of patients with (K)RAS WT tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4377474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43774742015-04-08 Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials Kripp, M. Horisberger, K. Mai, S. Kienle, P. Gaiser, T. Post, S. Wenz, F. Merx, K. Hofheinz, R.-D. Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article Purpose. The addition of cetuximab to radiochemotherapy (RCT) failed to improve complete response rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We report the long-term results in patients treated within two sequential clinical trials. Methods. Patients receiving neoadjuvant RCT using capecitabine and irinotecan (CapIri) within a phase I/II trial or CapIri + cetuximab within a phase II trial were evaluated for analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). KRAS exon 2 mutational status had been analyzed in patients receiving cetuximab. Results. 37 patients from the CapIri trial and 49 patients from the CapIri-cetuximab treatment group were evaluable. Median follow-up time was 75.2 months. The 5-year DFS rate was 82% (CapIri) and 79% (CapIri-cetuximab) (P = 0.62). The median OS was 127.4 months. 5-year OS was 73% for both groups (CapIri and CapIri-cetuximab) (P = 0.61). No significant difference in DFS (P = 0.86) or OS (P = 0.39) was noticed between patients receiving CapIri and those receiving CapIri-cetuximab with KRAS wild-type tumors. Conclusions. As the addition of cetuximab did not improve neither DFS nor OS it should not play a role in the perioperative treatment of patients with LARC, not even of patients with (K)RAS WT tumors. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4377474/ /pubmed/25861256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/273489 Text en Copyright © 2015 M. Kripp et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kripp, M.
Horisberger, K.
Mai, S.
Kienle, P.
Gaiser, T.
Post, S.
Wenz, F.
Merx, K.
Hofheinz, R.-D.
Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials
title Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials
title_full Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials
title_fullStr Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials
title_full_unstemmed Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials
title_short Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials
title_sort does the addition of cetuximab to radiochemotherapy improve outcome of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer? long-term results from phase ii trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/273489
work_keys_str_mv AT krippm doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials
AT horisbergerk doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials
AT mais doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials
AT kienlep doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials
AT gaisert doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials
AT posts doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials
AT wenzf doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials
AT merxk doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials
AT hofheinzrd doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials