Cargando…
Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials
Purpose. The addition of cetuximab to radiochemotherapy (RCT) failed to improve complete response rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We report the long-term results in patients treated within two sequential clinical trials. Methods. Patients receiving neoadjuvant RCT using capecitabine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/273489 |
_version_ | 1782363917784186880 |
---|---|
author | Kripp, M. Horisberger, K. Mai, S. Kienle, P. Gaiser, T. Post, S. Wenz, F. Merx, K. Hofheinz, R.-D. |
author_facet | Kripp, M. Horisberger, K. Mai, S. Kienle, P. Gaiser, T. Post, S. Wenz, F. Merx, K. Hofheinz, R.-D. |
author_sort | Kripp, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. The addition of cetuximab to radiochemotherapy (RCT) failed to improve complete response rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We report the long-term results in patients treated within two sequential clinical trials. Methods. Patients receiving neoadjuvant RCT using capecitabine and irinotecan (CapIri) within a phase I/II trial or CapIri + cetuximab within a phase II trial were evaluated for analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). KRAS exon 2 mutational status had been analyzed in patients receiving cetuximab. Results. 37 patients from the CapIri trial and 49 patients from the CapIri-cetuximab treatment group were evaluable. Median follow-up time was 75.2 months. The 5-year DFS rate was 82% (CapIri) and 79% (CapIri-cetuximab) (P = 0.62). The median OS was 127.4 months. 5-year OS was 73% for both groups (CapIri and CapIri-cetuximab) (P = 0.61). No significant difference in DFS (P = 0.86) or OS (P = 0.39) was noticed between patients receiving CapIri and those receiving CapIri-cetuximab with KRAS wild-type tumors. Conclusions. As the addition of cetuximab did not improve neither DFS nor OS it should not play a role in the perioperative treatment of patients with LARC, not even of patients with (K)RAS WT tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4377474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43774742015-04-08 Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials Kripp, M. Horisberger, K. Mai, S. Kienle, P. Gaiser, T. Post, S. Wenz, F. Merx, K. Hofheinz, R.-D. Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article Purpose. The addition of cetuximab to radiochemotherapy (RCT) failed to improve complete response rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We report the long-term results in patients treated within two sequential clinical trials. Methods. Patients receiving neoadjuvant RCT using capecitabine and irinotecan (CapIri) within a phase I/II trial or CapIri + cetuximab within a phase II trial were evaluated for analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). KRAS exon 2 mutational status had been analyzed in patients receiving cetuximab. Results. 37 patients from the CapIri trial and 49 patients from the CapIri-cetuximab treatment group were evaluable. Median follow-up time was 75.2 months. The 5-year DFS rate was 82% (CapIri) and 79% (CapIri-cetuximab) (P = 0.62). The median OS was 127.4 months. 5-year OS was 73% for both groups (CapIri and CapIri-cetuximab) (P = 0.61). No significant difference in DFS (P = 0.86) or OS (P = 0.39) was noticed between patients receiving CapIri and those receiving CapIri-cetuximab with KRAS wild-type tumors. Conclusions. As the addition of cetuximab did not improve neither DFS nor OS it should not play a role in the perioperative treatment of patients with LARC, not even of patients with (K)RAS WT tumors. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4377474/ /pubmed/25861256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/273489 Text en Copyright © 2015 M. Kripp et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kripp, M. Horisberger, K. Mai, S. Kienle, P. Gaiser, T. Post, S. Wenz, F. Merx, K. Hofheinz, R.-D. Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials |
title | Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials |
title_full | Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials |
title_fullStr | Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials |
title_short | Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials |
title_sort | does the addition of cetuximab to radiochemotherapy improve outcome of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer? long-term results from phase ii trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4377474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/273489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krippm doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials AT horisbergerk doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials AT mais doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials AT kienlep doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials AT gaisert doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials AT posts doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials AT wenzf doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials AT merxk doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials AT hofheinzrd doestheadditionofcetuximabtoradiochemotherapyimproveoutcomeofpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerlongtermresultsfromphaseiitrials |