Cargando…
No-Needle, Single-Visit Adult Male Circumcision with Unicirc: A Multi-Centre Field Trial
BACKGROUND: Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is a priority HIV preventive intervention. Current adult circumcision methods need improvement. METHODS: Field trial in 3 primary care centres. Minimally invasive VMMC using the Unicirc instrument following topical lidocaine/prilocaine anestheti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25822727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121686 |
_version_ | 1782364128286867456 |
---|---|
author | Millard, Peter S. Goldstuck, Norman D. |
author_facet | Millard, Peter S. Goldstuck, Norman D. |
author_sort | Millard, Peter S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is a priority HIV preventive intervention. Current adult circumcision methods need improvement. METHODS: Field trial in 3 primary care centres. Minimally invasive VMMC using the Unicirc instrument following topical lidocaine/prilocaine anesthetic. Men were followed up at 1 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: We circumcised 110 healthy volunteers. Two men complained of transient burning pain during circumcision, but none required injectable anaesthesia. Median blood loss was 1ml and median procedure time was 9.0 min. There were 7 (6.3%) moderate complications (5 (4.5%) post-operative bleeds requiring suture and 2 (1.8%) post-operative infections) affecting 7 men. No men experienced significant wound dehiscence. 90.4% of men were fully healed at 4 weeks of follow-up and all were highly satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Use of topical anaesthesia obviates the need for injectable anesthetic and makes the Unicirc procedure nearly painless. Unicirc is rapid, easy to learn, heals by primary intention with excellent cosmetic results, obviates the need for a return visit for device removal, and is potentially cheaper and safer than other methods. Use of this method will greatly facilitate scale-up of mass circumcision programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02091726 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4379010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43790102015-04-09 No-Needle, Single-Visit Adult Male Circumcision with Unicirc: A Multi-Centre Field Trial Millard, Peter S. Goldstuck, Norman D. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is a priority HIV preventive intervention. Current adult circumcision methods need improvement. METHODS: Field trial in 3 primary care centres. Minimally invasive VMMC using the Unicirc instrument following topical lidocaine/prilocaine anesthetic. Men were followed up at 1 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: We circumcised 110 healthy volunteers. Two men complained of transient burning pain during circumcision, but none required injectable anaesthesia. Median blood loss was 1ml and median procedure time was 9.0 min. There were 7 (6.3%) moderate complications (5 (4.5%) post-operative bleeds requiring suture and 2 (1.8%) post-operative infections) affecting 7 men. No men experienced significant wound dehiscence. 90.4% of men were fully healed at 4 weeks of follow-up and all were highly satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Use of topical anaesthesia obviates the need for injectable anesthetic and makes the Unicirc procedure nearly painless. Unicirc is rapid, easy to learn, heals by primary intention with excellent cosmetic results, obviates the need for a return visit for device removal, and is potentially cheaper and safer than other methods. Use of this method will greatly facilitate scale-up of mass circumcision programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02091726 Public Library of Science 2015-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4379010/ /pubmed/25822727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121686 Text en © 2015 Millard, Goldstuck http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Millard, Peter S. Goldstuck, Norman D. No-Needle, Single-Visit Adult Male Circumcision with Unicirc: A Multi-Centre Field Trial |
title | No-Needle, Single-Visit Adult Male Circumcision with Unicirc: A Multi-Centre Field Trial |
title_full | No-Needle, Single-Visit Adult Male Circumcision with Unicirc: A Multi-Centre Field Trial |
title_fullStr | No-Needle, Single-Visit Adult Male Circumcision with Unicirc: A Multi-Centre Field Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | No-Needle, Single-Visit Adult Male Circumcision with Unicirc: A Multi-Centre Field Trial |
title_short | No-Needle, Single-Visit Adult Male Circumcision with Unicirc: A Multi-Centre Field Trial |
title_sort | no-needle, single-visit adult male circumcision with unicirc: a multi-centre field trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25822727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millardpeters noneedlesinglevisitadultmalecircumcisionwithunicircamulticentrefieldtrial AT goldstucknormand noneedlesinglevisitadultmalecircumcisionwithunicircamulticentrefieldtrial |