Cargando…
Evaluation of Two Influenza Surveillance Systems in South Africa
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation recommends outpatient influenza-like illness (ILI) and inpatient severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) surveillance. We evaluated two influenza surveillance systems in South Africa: one for ILI and another for SARI. METHODOLOGY: The Viral Watch (VW) progra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25822719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120226 |
_version_ | 1782364133380849664 |
---|---|
author | Budgell, Eric Cohen, Adam L. McAnerney, Jo Walaza, Sibongile Madhi, Shabir A. Blumberg, Lucille Dawood, Halima Kahn, Kathleen Tempia, Stefano Venter, Marietjie Cohen, Cheryl |
author_facet | Budgell, Eric Cohen, Adam L. McAnerney, Jo Walaza, Sibongile Madhi, Shabir A. Blumberg, Lucille Dawood, Halima Kahn, Kathleen Tempia, Stefano Venter, Marietjie Cohen, Cheryl |
author_sort | Budgell, Eric |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation recommends outpatient influenza-like illness (ILI) and inpatient severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) surveillance. We evaluated two influenza surveillance systems in South Africa: one for ILI and another for SARI. METHODOLOGY: The Viral Watch (VW) programme has collected virological influenza surveillance data voluntarily from patients with ILI since 1984 in private and public clinics in all 9 South African provinces. The SARI surveillance programme has collected epidemiological and virological influenza surveillance data since 2009 in public hospitals in 4 provinces by dedicated personnel. We compared nine surveillance system attributes from 2009–2012. RESULTS: We analysed data from 18,293 SARI patients and 9,104 ILI patients. The annual proportion of samples testing positive for influenza was higher for VW (mean 41%) than SARI (mean 8%) and generally exceeded the seasonal threshold from May to September (VW: weeks 21–40; SARI: weeks 23–39). Data quality was a major strength of SARI (most data completion measures >90%; adherence to definitions: 88–89%) and a relative weakness of the VW programme (62% of forms complete, with limited epidemiologic data collected; adherence to definitions: 65–82%). Timeliness was a relative strength of both systems (e.g. both collected >93% of all respiratory specimens within 7 days of symptom onset). ILI surveillance was more nationally representative, financially sustainable and expandable than the SARI system. Though the SARI programme is not nationally representative, the high quality and detail of SARI data collection sheds light on the local burden and epidemiology of severe influenza-associated disease. CONCLUSIONS: To best monitor influenza in South Africa, we propose that both ILI and SARI should be under surveillance. Improving ILI surveillance will require better quality and more systematic data collection, and SARI surveillance should be expanded to be more nationally representative, even if this requires scaling back on information gathered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4379032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43790322015-04-09 Evaluation of Two Influenza Surveillance Systems in South Africa Budgell, Eric Cohen, Adam L. McAnerney, Jo Walaza, Sibongile Madhi, Shabir A. Blumberg, Lucille Dawood, Halima Kahn, Kathleen Tempia, Stefano Venter, Marietjie Cohen, Cheryl PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation recommends outpatient influenza-like illness (ILI) and inpatient severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) surveillance. We evaluated two influenza surveillance systems in South Africa: one for ILI and another for SARI. METHODOLOGY: The Viral Watch (VW) programme has collected virological influenza surveillance data voluntarily from patients with ILI since 1984 in private and public clinics in all 9 South African provinces. The SARI surveillance programme has collected epidemiological and virological influenza surveillance data since 2009 in public hospitals in 4 provinces by dedicated personnel. We compared nine surveillance system attributes from 2009–2012. RESULTS: We analysed data from 18,293 SARI patients and 9,104 ILI patients. The annual proportion of samples testing positive for influenza was higher for VW (mean 41%) than SARI (mean 8%) and generally exceeded the seasonal threshold from May to September (VW: weeks 21–40; SARI: weeks 23–39). Data quality was a major strength of SARI (most data completion measures >90%; adherence to definitions: 88–89%) and a relative weakness of the VW programme (62% of forms complete, with limited epidemiologic data collected; adherence to definitions: 65–82%). Timeliness was a relative strength of both systems (e.g. both collected >93% of all respiratory specimens within 7 days of symptom onset). ILI surveillance was more nationally representative, financially sustainable and expandable than the SARI system. Though the SARI programme is not nationally representative, the high quality and detail of SARI data collection sheds light on the local burden and epidemiology of severe influenza-associated disease. CONCLUSIONS: To best monitor influenza in South Africa, we propose that both ILI and SARI should be under surveillance. Improving ILI surveillance will require better quality and more systematic data collection, and SARI surveillance should be expanded to be more nationally representative, even if this requires scaling back on information gathered. Public Library of Science 2015-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4379032/ /pubmed/25822719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120226 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Budgell, Eric Cohen, Adam L. McAnerney, Jo Walaza, Sibongile Madhi, Shabir A. Blumberg, Lucille Dawood, Halima Kahn, Kathleen Tempia, Stefano Venter, Marietjie Cohen, Cheryl Evaluation of Two Influenza Surveillance Systems in South Africa |
title | Evaluation of Two Influenza Surveillance Systems in South Africa |
title_full | Evaluation of Two Influenza Surveillance Systems in South Africa |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Two Influenza Surveillance Systems in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Two Influenza Surveillance Systems in South Africa |
title_short | Evaluation of Two Influenza Surveillance Systems in South Africa |
title_sort | evaluation of two influenza surveillance systems in south africa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25822719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT budgelleric evaluationoftwoinfluenzasurveillancesystemsinsouthafrica AT cohenadaml evaluationoftwoinfluenzasurveillancesystemsinsouthafrica AT mcanerneyjo evaluationoftwoinfluenzasurveillancesystemsinsouthafrica AT walazasibongile evaluationoftwoinfluenzasurveillancesystemsinsouthafrica AT madhishabira evaluationoftwoinfluenzasurveillancesystemsinsouthafrica AT blumberglucille evaluationoftwoinfluenzasurveillancesystemsinsouthafrica AT dawoodhalima evaluationoftwoinfluenzasurveillancesystemsinsouthafrica AT kahnkathleen evaluationoftwoinfluenzasurveillancesystemsinsouthafrica AT tempiastefano evaluationoftwoinfluenzasurveillancesystemsinsouthafrica AT ventermarietjie evaluationoftwoinfluenzasurveillancesystemsinsouthafrica AT cohencheryl evaluationoftwoinfluenzasurveillancesystemsinsouthafrica |