Cargando…

Comparison of fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with different esthetic onlay systems: An in vitro study

AIM: To compare the fracture resistance and modes of failures of three different aesthetic MOD onlays on endodontically treated premolars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty sound maxillary premolars were selected of which 10 untreated teeth were taken as control (Group I). The other thirty premolars were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mynampati, Praffulla, Babu, Mandava Ramesh, Saraswathi, Devabhaktuni Disha, Kumar, Janga Ravi, Gudugunta, Leneena, Gaddam, Divya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25829694
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153072
_version_ 1782364225799192576
author Mynampati, Praffulla
Babu, Mandava Ramesh
Saraswathi, Devabhaktuni Disha
Kumar, Janga Ravi
Gudugunta, Leneena
Gaddam, Divya
author_facet Mynampati, Praffulla
Babu, Mandava Ramesh
Saraswathi, Devabhaktuni Disha
Kumar, Janga Ravi
Gudugunta, Leneena
Gaddam, Divya
author_sort Mynampati, Praffulla
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the fracture resistance and modes of failures of three different aesthetic MOD onlays on endodontically treated premolars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty sound maxillary premolars were selected of which 10 untreated teeth were taken as control (Group I). The other thirty premolars were subjected to standardized MOD onlay preparations and root canal treatments and divided into 3 equal groups. Onlays were prepared in Group II- Indirect composite, Group III- Lithium Disilicate ceramic and Group IV- Full Zirconia. All onlays were cemented using Multilink Automix. All the 40 samples were subjected to fracture resistance testing on Universal testing machine. Also fractured specimens were observed under stereo-microscope for modes of failure. RESULTS: Group IV presented the highest fracture resistance. Groups II and III presented no significant difference in fracture resistance from each other (P > 0.05). Group II and Group III showed significantly lower fracture resistance values than Group I. Coming to modes of failure, only Group IV had showed no cracks in any of the restorations. CONCLUSION: Full Zirconia MOD onlays increased the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars to a significantly higher level than the sound teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4379655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43796552015-03-31 Comparison of fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with different esthetic onlay systems: An in vitro study Mynampati, Praffulla Babu, Mandava Ramesh Saraswathi, Devabhaktuni Disha Kumar, Janga Ravi Gudugunta, Leneena Gaddam, Divya J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: To compare the fracture resistance and modes of failures of three different aesthetic MOD onlays on endodontically treated premolars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty sound maxillary premolars were selected of which 10 untreated teeth were taken as control (Group I). The other thirty premolars were subjected to standardized MOD onlay preparations and root canal treatments and divided into 3 equal groups. Onlays were prepared in Group II- Indirect composite, Group III- Lithium Disilicate ceramic and Group IV- Full Zirconia. All onlays were cemented using Multilink Automix. All the 40 samples were subjected to fracture resistance testing on Universal testing machine. Also fractured specimens were observed under stereo-microscope for modes of failure. RESULTS: Group IV presented the highest fracture resistance. Groups II and III presented no significant difference in fracture resistance from each other (P > 0.05). Group II and Group III showed significantly lower fracture resistance values than Group I. Coming to modes of failure, only Group IV had showed no cracks in any of the restorations. CONCLUSION: Full Zirconia MOD onlays increased the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars to a significantly higher level than the sound teeth. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4379655/ /pubmed/25829694 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153072 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mynampati, Praffulla
Babu, Mandava Ramesh
Saraswathi, Devabhaktuni Disha
Kumar, Janga Ravi
Gudugunta, Leneena
Gaddam, Divya
Comparison of fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with different esthetic onlay systems: An in vitro study
title Comparison of fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with different esthetic onlay systems: An in vitro study
title_full Comparison of fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with different esthetic onlay systems: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison of fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with different esthetic onlay systems: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with different esthetic onlay systems: An in vitro study
title_short Comparison of fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with different esthetic onlay systems: An in vitro study
title_sort comparison of fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with different esthetic onlay systems: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25829694
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153072
work_keys_str_mv AT mynampatipraffulla comparisonoffractureresistanceandfailurepatternofendodonticallytreatedpremolarswithdifferentestheticonlaysystemsaninvitrostudy
AT babumandavaramesh comparisonoffractureresistanceandfailurepatternofendodonticallytreatedpremolarswithdifferentestheticonlaysystemsaninvitrostudy
AT saraswathidevabhaktunidisha comparisonoffractureresistanceandfailurepatternofendodonticallytreatedpremolarswithdifferentestheticonlaysystemsaninvitrostudy
AT kumarjangaravi comparisonoffractureresistanceandfailurepatternofendodonticallytreatedpremolarswithdifferentestheticonlaysystemsaninvitrostudy
AT guduguntaleneena comparisonoffractureresistanceandfailurepatternofendodonticallytreatedpremolarswithdifferentestheticonlaysystemsaninvitrostudy
AT gaddamdivya comparisonoffractureresistanceandfailurepatternofendodonticallytreatedpremolarswithdifferentestheticonlaysystemsaninvitrostudy