Cargando…
Comparison of variation in the light curing cycle with a time gap and its effect on polymerization shrinkage, degree of conversion and microhardness of a nanohybrid composite
BACKGROUND: Giving a time gap and distance during curing can decrease the polymerization shrinkage. AIM: To evaluate the effect of time gap and distance between the curing tip and restoration on the polymerization shrinkage, degree of monomer conversion (DOC), and microhardness of a nanohybrid compo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25829697 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153055 |
_version_ | 1782364226475524096 |
---|---|
author | Subbiya, Arunajatesan Pearlin Mary, Newbegin Selvakumar Gold Suresh, Malathi Vivekanandhan, Paramasivam Dhakshinamoorthy, Malarvizhi Sukumaran, Vridhachalam Ganapathy |
author_facet | Subbiya, Arunajatesan Pearlin Mary, Newbegin Selvakumar Gold Suresh, Malathi Vivekanandhan, Paramasivam Dhakshinamoorthy, Malarvizhi Sukumaran, Vridhachalam Ganapathy |
author_sort | Subbiya, Arunajatesan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Giving a time gap and distance during curing can decrease the polymerization shrinkage. AIM: To evaluate the effect of time gap and distance between the curing tip and restoration on the polymerization shrinkage, degree of monomer conversion (DOC), and microhardness of a nanohybrid composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 standardized cylindrical specimens (Z350, 3M ESPE) were fabricated using a brass mould. The curing was done in contact with the sample surface for 20 seconds in the control group. In the four experimental groups, curing was initiated at 1-cm distance, followed by variation in the time gap and the curing cycle. The polymerization shrinkage, DOC, microhardness was calculated. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc-Dunnett test were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Curing at 1-cm distance for 10 seconds with a gap of 10 seconds and finishing the curing cycle with 20 seconds at 0 cm proved to be an appropriate technique to reduce the polymerization shrinkage without significantly affecting the DOC and microhardness. CONCLUSION: A simple innovative modification of varying the distance of curing and a time gap in the curing cycle can decrease the polymerization shrinkage without affecting the DOC and microhardness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4379658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43796582015-03-31 Comparison of variation in the light curing cycle with a time gap and its effect on polymerization shrinkage, degree of conversion and microhardness of a nanohybrid composite Subbiya, Arunajatesan Pearlin Mary, Newbegin Selvakumar Gold Suresh, Malathi Vivekanandhan, Paramasivam Dhakshinamoorthy, Malarvizhi Sukumaran, Vridhachalam Ganapathy J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Giving a time gap and distance during curing can decrease the polymerization shrinkage. AIM: To evaluate the effect of time gap and distance between the curing tip and restoration on the polymerization shrinkage, degree of monomer conversion (DOC), and microhardness of a nanohybrid composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 standardized cylindrical specimens (Z350, 3M ESPE) were fabricated using a brass mould. The curing was done in contact with the sample surface for 20 seconds in the control group. In the four experimental groups, curing was initiated at 1-cm distance, followed by variation in the time gap and the curing cycle. The polymerization shrinkage, DOC, microhardness was calculated. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc-Dunnett test were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Curing at 1-cm distance for 10 seconds with a gap of 10 seconds and finishing the curing cycle with 20 seconds at 0 cm proved to be an appropriate technique to reduce the polymerization shrinkage without significantly affecting the DOC and microhardness. CONCLUSION: A simple innovative modification of varying the distance of curing and a time gap in the curing cycle can decrease the polymerization shrinkage without affecting the DOC and microhardness. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4379658/ /pubmed/25829697 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153055 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Subbiya, Arunajatesan Pearlin Mary, Newbegin Selvakumar Gold Suresh, Malathi Vivekanandhan, Paramasivam Dhakshinamoorthy, Malarvizhi Sukumaran, Vridhachalam Ganapathy Comparison of variation in the light curing cycle with a time gap and its effect on polymerization shrinkage, degree of conversion and microhardness of a nanohybrid composite |
title | Comparison of variation in the light curing cycle with a time gap and its effect on polymerization shrinkage, degree of conversion and microhardness of a nanohybrid composite |
title_full | Comparison of variation in the light curing cycle with a time gap and its effect on polymerization shrinkage, degree of conversion and microhardness of a nanohybrid composite |
title_fullStr | Comparison of variation in the light curing cycle with a time gap and its effect on polymerization shrinkage, degree of conversion and microhardness of a nanohybrid composite |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of variation in the light curing cycle with a time gap and its effect on polymerization shrinkage, degree of conversion and microhardness of a nanohybrid composite |
title_short | Comparison of variation in the light curing cycle with a time gap and its effect on polymerization shrinkage, degree of conversion and microhardness of a nanohybrid composite |
title_sort | comparison of variation in the light curing cycle with a time gap and its effect on polymerization shrinkage, degree of conversion and microhardness of a nanohybrid composite |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25829697 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT subbiyaarunajatesan comparisonofvariationinthelightcuringcyclewithatimegapanditseffectonpolymerizationshrinkagedegreeofconversionandmicrohardnessofananohybridcomposite AT pearlinmarynewbeginselvakumargold comparisonofvariationinthelightcuringcyclewithatimegapanditseffectonpolymerizationshrinkagedegreeofconversionandmicrohardnessofananohybridcomposite AT sureshmalathi comparisonofvariationinthelightcuringcyclewithatimegapanditseffectonpolymerizationshrinkagedegreeofconversionandmicrohardnessofananohybridcomposite AT vivekanandhanparamasivam comparisonofvariationinthelightcuringcyclewithatimegapanditseffectonpolymerizationshrinkagedegreeofconversionandmicrohardnessofananohybridcomposite AT dhakshinamoorthymalarvizhi comparisonofvariationinthelightcuringcyclewithatimegapanditseffectonpolymerizationshrinkagedegreeofconversionandmicrohardnessofananohybridcomposite AT sukumaranvridhachalamganapathy comparisonofvariationinthelightcuringcyclewithatimegapanditseffectonpolymerizationshrinkagedegreeofconversionandmicrohardnessofananohybridcomposite |