Cargando…

Evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration of two new materials using tube dilution method: An in vitro study

AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of two new materials MTA Plus and Biodentine with ProRoot MTA using tube dilution method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The materials used were ProRoot MTA (Dentsply), MTA Plus (compounded by Prevest Denpro, Jammu, India for Av...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiremath, Geeta S., Kulkarni, Raghavendra D., Naik, Balaram D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25829698
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153056
_version_ 1782364226710405120
author Hiremath, Geeta S.
Kulkarni, Raghavendra D.
Naik, Balaram D.
author_facet Hiremath, Geeta S.
Kulkarni, Raghavendra D.
Naik, Balaram D.
author_sort Hiremath, Geeta S.
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of two new materials MTA Plus and Biodentine with ProRoot MTA using tube dilution method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The materials used were ProRoot MTA (Dentsply), MTA Plus (compounded by Prevest Denpro, Jammu, India for Avalon Biomed Inc, USA) and a calcium silicate based material Biodentine (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fosses, France). Doubling dilutions of the material were prepared in Sabouraud's dextrose broth (SDB) and Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth for Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis, respectively. The minimal concentration at which inhibition of microorganism occurred was measured and noted as minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the material. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the materials against C. albicans. Biodentine was statistically significant than MTA Plus against E. faecalis (P-value-0.022). ProRoot MTA was statistically significant at different time intervals against E. faecalis (P-value-0.001). CONCLUSION: ProRoot MTA and Biodentine proved to have antimicrobial property. MTA Plusproved as a good antifungal agent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4379659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43796592015-03-31 Evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration of two new materials using tube dilution method: An in vitro study Hiremath, Geeta S. Kulkarni, Raghavendra D. Naik, Balaram D. J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of two new materials MTA Plus and Biodentine with ProRoot MTA using tube dilution method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The materials used were ProRoot MTA (Dentsply), MTA Plus (compounded by Prevest Denpro, Jammu, India for Avalon Biomed Inc, USA) and a calcium silicate based material Biodentine (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fosses, France). Doubling dilutions of the material were prepared in Sabouraud's dextrose broth (SDB) and Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth for Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis, respectively. The minimal concentration at which inhibition of microorganism occurred was measured and noted as minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the material. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the materials against C. albicans. Biodentine was statistically significant than MTA Plus against E. faecalis (P-value-0.022). ProRoot MTA was statistically significant at different time intervals against E. faecalis (P-value-0.001). CONCLUSION: ProRoot MTA and Biodentine proved to have antimicrobial property. MTA Plusproved as a good antifungal agent. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4379659/ /pubmed/25829698 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153056 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hiremath, Geeta S.
Kulkarni, Raghavendra D.
Naik, Balaram D.
Evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration of two new materials using tube dilution method: An in vitro study
title Evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration of two new materials using tube dilution method: An in vitro study
title_full Evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration of two new materials using tube dilution method: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration of two new materials using tube dilution method: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration of two new materials using tube dilution method: An in vitro study
title_short Evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration of two new materials using tube dilution method: An in vitro study
title_sort evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration of two new materials using tube dilution method: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25829698
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153056
work_keys_str_mv AT hiremathgeetas evaluationofminimalinhibitoryconcentrationoftwonewmaterialsusingtubedilutionmethodaninvitrostudy
AT kulkarniraghavendrad evaluationofminimalinhibitoryconcentrationoftwonewmaterialsusingtubedilutionmethodaninvitrostudy
AT naikbalaramd evaluationofminimalinhibitoryconcentrationoftwonewmaterialsusingtubedilutionmethodaninvitrostudy