Cargando…

18-F flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging: A viable alternative to three phase bone scan in evaluating diabetic foot complications?

BACKGROUND: This paper is based on the initial findings from a prospective ongoing study to evaluate the efficacy of flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET CT) in diabetic foot evaluation. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of three pha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shagos, G. S., Shanmugasundaram, Palaniswamy, Varma, Ajith Kumar, Padma, Subramanyam, Sarma, Manjit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25829725
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.152946
_version_ 1782364233980182528
author Shagos, G. S.
Shanmugasundaram, Palaniswamy
Varma, Ajith Kumar
Padma, Subramanyam
Sarma, Manjit
author_facet Shagos, G. S.
Shanmugasundaram, Palaniswamy
Varma, Ajith Kumar
Padma, Subramanyam
Sarma, Manjit
author_sort Shagos, G. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper is based on the initial findings from a prospective ongoing study to evaluate the efficacy of flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET CT) in diabetic foot evaluation. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of three phase bone scan (TPBS) and FDG PET-CT (FDG-PET) in diabetic foot evaluation. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with complicated diabetic foot (osteomyelitis/cellulitis, Charcot's neuropathy) were prospectively investigated. TPBS (15 mci methylene di phosphonate [MDP] intravenous [IV]), followed by FDG-PET (5 mci IV) within 5 days were performed in all patients. Based on referral indication, patients grouped into Group I, n = 36, (?osteomyelitis/cellulitis) and Group II, n = 43 (?Charcot's neuropathy). Interpretation was based on intensity, extent, pattern of MDP and FDG uptake (standardized uptake value) along with CT correlation. Findings were compared with final diagnostic outcome based on bone/soft tissue culture in Group I and clinical, radiological or scintigraphic followup in Group II. Results: Group I: For diagnosing osteomyelitis, TP: TN: FP: FN were 14:5:2:2 by FDG PET and 13:02:05:03 by TPBS respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) of FDG-PET were 87.5%, 71%, 87.5% and 71% and 81.25%, 28.5%, 72% and 40% for TPBS, respectively. Group II: charcot's: cellulitis: Normal were 22:14:7 by FDG PET and 32:5:6 by TPBS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Flourodeoxy glucose PET-CT has a higher specificity and NPV than TPBS in diagnosing pedal osteomyelitis. TPBS, being highly sensitive is more useful than FDG-PET in detecting Charcot's neuropathy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4379691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43796912015-04-01 18-F flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging: A viable alternative to three phase bone scan in evaluating diabetic foot complications? Shagos, G. S. Shanmugasundaram, Palaniswamy Varma, Ajith Kumar Padma, Subramanyam Sarma, Manjit Indian J Nucl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: This paper is based on the initial findings from a prospective ongoing study to evaluate the efficacy of flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET CT) in diabetic foot evaluation. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of three phase bone scan (TPBS) and FDG PET-CT (FDG-PET) in diabetic foot evaluation. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with complicated diabetic foot (osteomyelitis/cellulitis, Charcot's neuropathy) were prospectively investigated. TPBS (15 mci methylene di phosphonate [MDP] intravenous [IV]), followed by FDG-PET (5 mci IV) within 5 days were performed in all patients. Based on referral indication, patients grouped into Group I, n = 36, (?osteomyelitis/cellulitis) and Group II, n = 43 (?Charcot's neuropathy). Interpretation was based on intensity, extent, pattern of MDP and FDG uptake (standardized uptake value) along with CT correlation. Findings were compared with final diagnostic outcome based on bone/soft tissue culture in Group I and clinical, radiological or scintigraphic followup in Group II. Results: Group I: For diagnosing osteomyelitis, TP: TN: FP: FN were 14:5:2:2 by FDG PET and 13:02:05:03 by TPBS respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) of FDG-PET were 87.5%, 71%, 87.5% and 71% and 81.25%, 28.5%, 72% and 40% for TPBS, respectively. Group II: charcot's: cellulitis: Normal were 22:14:7 by FDG PET and 32:5:6 by TPBS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Flourodeoxy glucose PET-CT has a higher specificity and NPV than TPBS in diagnosing pedal osteomyelitis. TPBS, being highly sensitive is more useful than FDG-PET in detecting Charcot's neuropathy. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4379691/ /pubmed/25829725 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.152946 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shagos, G. S.
Shanmugasundaram, Palaniswamy
Varma, Ajith Kumar
Padma, Subramanyam
Sarma, Manjit
18-F flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging: A viable alternative to three phase bone scan in evaluating diabetic foot complications?
title 18-F flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging: A viable alternative to three phase bone scan in evaluating diabetic foot complications?
title_full 18-F flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging: A viable alternative to three phase bone scan in evaluating diabetic foot complications?
title_fullStr 18-F flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging: A viable alternative to three phase bone scan in evaluating diabetic foot complications?
title_full_unstemmed 18-F flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging: A viable alternative to three phase bone scan in evaluating diabetic foot complications?
title_short 18-F flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging: A viable alternative to three phase bone scan in evaluating diabetic foot complications?
title_sort 18-f flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging: a viable alternative to three phase bone scan in evaluating diabetic foot complications?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25829725
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.152946
work_keys_str_mv AT shagosgs 18fflourodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingaviablealternativetothreephasebonescaninevaluatingdiabeticfootcomplications
AT shanmugasundarampalaniswamy 18fflourodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingaviablealternativetothreephasebonescaninevaluatingdiabeticfootcomplications
AT varmaajithkumar 18fflourodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingaviablealternativetothreephasebonescaninevaluatingdiabeticfootcomplications
AT padmasubramanyam 18fflourodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingaviablealternativetothreephasebonescaninevaluatingdiabeticfootcomplications
AT sarmamanjit 18fflourodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingaviablealternativetothreephasebonescaninevaluatingdiabeticfootcomplications