Cargando…
Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why
Bayesian reasoning, defined here as the updating of a posterior probability following new information, has historically been problematic for humans. Classic psychology experiments have tested human Bayesian reasoning through the use of word problems and have evaluated each participant’s performance...
Autores principales: | Brase, Gary L., Hill, W. Trey |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25873904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00340 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Myoepithelial cells: good fences make good neighbors
por: Adriance, Melissa C, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Good Fences Make Good Neighbors: Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Vascular Disease
por: Mayne, Elizabeth S, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The Bayesian boom: good thing or bad?
por: Hahn, Ulrike
Publicado: (2014) -
What makes a good experiment ?: reasons and roles in science
por: Franklin, Allan
Publicado: (2016) -
The making of the good neighbor policy
por: Wood, Bryce, 1909-
Publicado: (1961)