Cargando…
Unmasking host and microbial strategies in the Agrobacterium-plant defense tango
Coevolutionary forces drive adaptation of both plant-associated microbes and their hosts. Eloquently captured in the Red Queen Hypothesis, the complexity of each plant–pathogen relationship reflects escalating adversarial strategies, but also external biotic and abiotic pressures on both partners. I...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25873923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00200 |
_version_ | 1782364244092649472 |
---|---|
author | Hwang, Elizabeth E. Wang, Melinda B. Bravo, Janis E. Banta, Lois M. |
author_facet | Hwang, Elizabeth E. Wang, Melinda B. Bravo, Janis E. Banta, Lois M. |
author_sort | Hwang, Elizabeth E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Coevolutionary forces drive adaptation of both plant-associated microbes and their hosts. Eloquently captured in the Red Queen Hypothesis, the complexity of each plant–pathogen relationship reflects escalating adversarial strategies, but also external biotic and abiotic pressures on both partners. Innate immune responses are triggered by highly conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns, or PAMPs, that are harbingers of microbial presence. Upon cell surface receptor-mediated recognition of these pathogen-derived molecules, host plants mount a variety of physiological responses to limit pathogen survival and/or invasion. Successful pathogens often rely on secretion systems to translocate host-modulating effectors that subvert plant defenses, thereby increasing virulence. Host plants, in turn, have evolved to recognize these effectors, activating what has typically been characterized as a pathogen-specific form of immunity. Recent data support the notion that PAMP-triggered and effector-triggered defenses are complementary facets of a convergent, albeit differentially regulated, set of immune responses. This review highlights the key players in the plant’s recognition and signal transduction pathways, with a focus on the aspects that may limit Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection and the ways it might overcome those defenses. Recent advances in the field include a growing appreciation for the contributions of cytoskeletal dynamics and membrane trafficking to the regulation of these exquisitely tuned defenses. Pathogen counter-defenses frequently manipulate the interwoven hormonal pathways that mediate host responses. Emerging systems-level analyses include host physiological factors such as circadian cycling. The existing literature indicates that varying or even conflicting results from different labs may well be attributable to environmental factors including time of day of infection, temperature, and/or developmental stage of the host plant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4379751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43797512015-04-13 Unmasking host and microbial strategies in the Agrobacterium-plant defense tango Hwang, Elizabeth E. Wang, Melinda B. Bravo, Janis E. Banta, Lois M. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Coevolutionary forces drive adaptation of both plant-associated microbes and their hosts. Eloquently captured in the Red Queen Hypothesis, the complexity of each plant–pathogen relationship reflects escalating adversarial strategies, but also external biotic and abiotic pressures on both partners. Innate immune responses are triggered by highly conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns, or PAMPs, that are harbingers of microbial presence. Upon cell surface receptor-mediated recognition of these pathogen-derived molecules, host plants mount a variety of physiological responses to limit pathogen survival and/or invasion. Successful pathogens often rely on secretion systems to translocate host-modulating effectors that subvert plant defenses, thereby increasing virulence. Host plants, in turn, have evolved to recognize these effectors, activating what has typically been characterized as a pathogen-specific form of immunity. Recent data support the notion that PAMP-triggered and effector-triggered defenses are complementary facets of a convergent, albeit differentially regulated, set of immune responses. This review highlights the key players in the plant’s recognition and signal transduction pathways, with a focus on the aspects that may limit Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection and the ways it might overcome those defenses. Recent advances in the field include a growing appreciation for the contributions of cytoskeletal dynamics and membrane trafficking to the regulation of these exquisitely tuned defenses. Pathogen counter-defenses frequently manipulate the interwoven hormonal pathways that mediate host responses. Emerging systems-level analyses include host physiological factors such as circadian cycling. The existing literature indicates that varying or even conflicting results from different labs may well be attributable to environmental factors including time of day of infection, temperature, and/or developmental stage of the host plant. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4379751/ /pubmed/25873923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00200 Text en Copyright © 2015 Hwang, Wang, Bravo and Banta. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Hwang, Elizabeth E. Wang, Melinda B. Bravo, Janis E. Banta, Lois M. Unmasking host and microbial strategies in the Agrobacterium-plant defense tango |
title | Unmasking host and microbial strategies in the Agrobacterium-plant defense tango |
title_full | Unmasking host and microbial strategies in the Agrobacterium-plant defense tango |
title_fullStr | Unmasking host and microbial strategies in the Agrobacterium-plant defense tango |
title_full_unstemmed | Unmasking host and microbial strategies in the Agrobacterium-plant defense tango |
title_short | Unmasking host and microbial strategies in the Agrobacterium-plant defense tango |
title_sort | unmasking host and microbial strategies in the agrobacterium-plant defense tango |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25873923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hwangelizabethe unmaskinghostandmicrobialstrategiesintheagrobacteriumplantdefensetango AT wangmelindab unmaskinghostandmicrobialstrategiesintheagrobacteriumplantdefensetango AT bravojanise unmaskinghostandmicrobialstrategiesintheagrobacteriumplantdefensetango AT bantaloism unmaskinghostandmicrobialstrategiesintheagrobacteriumplantdefensetango |