Cargando…

A comparison of the dose distributions between the brachytherapy (125)I source models, STM1251 and Oncoseed 6711, in a geometry lacking radiation equilibrium scatter conditions

The purpose of this study was to estimate the uncertainty in the dose distribution for the (125)I source STM1251, as measured with a radiophotoluminescent glass rod dosimeter and calculated using the Monte Carlo code EGS5 in geometry that included the source structure reported by Kirov et al. This w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Kenichi, Kamo, Ken-ichi, Tateoka, Kunihiko, Asanuma, Osamu, Sato, Kaori, Takeda, Hiromitsu, Sakata, Koh-ichi, Takada, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25618137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru088
_version_ 1782364280065097728
author Tanaka, Kenichi
Kamo, Ken-ichi
Tateoka, Kunihiko
Asanuma, Osamu
Sato, Kaori
Takeda, Hiromitsu
Sakata, Koh-ichi
Takada, Jun
author_facet Tanaka, Kenichi
Kamo, Ken-ichi
Tateoka, Kunihiko
Asanuma, Osamu
Sato, Kaori
Takeda, Hiromitsu
Sakata, Koh-ichi
Takada, Jun
author_sort Tanaka, Kenichi
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to estimate the uncertainty in the dose distribution for the (125)I source STM1251, as measured with a radiophotoluminescent glass rod dosimeter and calculated using the Monte Carlo code EGS5 in geometry that included the source structure reported by Kirov et al. This was performed at a range of positions in and on a water phantom 18 cm in diameter and 16 cm in length. Some dosimetry positions were so close to the surface that the backscatter margin was insufficient for photons. Consequently, the combined standard uncertainty (CSU) at the coverage factor k of 1 was 11.0–11.2% for the measurement and 1.8–3.6% for the calculation. The calculation successfully reproduced the measured dose distribution within 13%, with CSU at k ≤ 1.6 (P > 0.3). Dose distributions were then compared with those for the (125)I source Oncoseed 6711. Our results supported the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 43 Updated Protocol (TG43U1) formalism, in which STM1251 dose distributions were more penetrating than those of Oncoseed 6711. This trend was also observed in the region near the phantom surface lacking the equilibrium radiation scatter conditions. In this region, the difference between the TG43U1 formalism and the measurement and calculation performed in the present study was not significant (P > 0.3) for either of the source models. Selection of the source model based on the treatment plans according to the TG43U1 formalism will be practical.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4380041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43800412015-04-15 A comparison of the dose distributions between the brachytherapy (125)I source models, STM1251 and Oncoseed 6711, in a geometry lacking radiation equilibrium scatter conditions Tanaka, Kenichi Kamo, Ken-ichi Tateoka, Kunihiko Asanuma, Osamu Sato, Kaori Takeda, Hiromitsu Sakata, Koh-ichi Takada, Jun J Radiat Res Physics The purpose of this study was to estimate the uncertainty in the dose distribution for the (125)I source STM1251, as measured with a radiophotoluminescent glass rod dosimeter and calculated using the Monte Carlo code EGS5 in geometry that included the source structure reported by Kirov et al. This was performed at a range of positions in and on a water phantom 18 cm in diameter and 16 cm in length. Some dosimetry positions were so close to the surface that the backscatter margin was insufficient for photons. Consequently, the combined standard uncertainty (CSU) at the coverage factor k of 1 was 11.0–11.2% for the measurement and 1.8–3.6% for the calculation. The calculation successfully reproduced the measured dose distribution within 13%, with CSU at k ≤ 1.6 (P > 0.3). Dose distributions were then compared with those for the (125)I source Oncoseed 6711. Our results supported the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 43 Updated Protocol (TG43U1) formalism, in which STM1251 dose distributions were more penetrating than those of Oncoseed 6711. This trend was also observed in the region near the phantom surface lacking the equilibrium radiation scatter conditions. In this region, the difference between the TG43U1 formalism and the measurement and calculation performed in the present study was not significant (P > 0.3) for either of the source models. Selection of the source model based on the treatment plans according to the TG43U1 formalism will be practical. Oxford University Press 2015-03 2015-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4380041/ /pubmed/25618137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru088 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
spellingShingle Physics
Tanaka, Kenichi
Kamo, Ken-ichi
Tateoka, Kunihiko
Asanuma, Osamu
Sato, Kaori
Takeda, Hiromitsu
Sakata, Koh-ichi
Takada, Jun
A comparison of the dose distributions between the brachytherapy (125)I source models, STM1251 and Oncoseed 6711, in a geometry lacking radiation equilibrium scatter conditions
title A comparison of the dose distributions between the brachytherapy (125)I source models, STM1251 and Oncoseed 6711, in a geometry lacking radiation equilibrium scatter conditions
title_full A comparison of the dose distributions between the brachytherapy (125)I source models, STM1251 and Oncoseed 6711, in a geometry lacking radiation equilibrium scatter conditions
title_fullStr A comparison of the dose distributions between the brachytherapy (125)I source models, STM1251 and Oncoseed 6711, in a geometry lacking radiation equilibrium scatter conditions
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the dose distributions between the brachytherapy (125)I source models, STM1251 and Oncoseed 6711, in a geometry lacking radiation equilibrium scatter conditions
title_short A comparison of the dose distributions between the brachytherapy (125)I source models, STM1251 and Oncoseed 6711, in a geometry lacking radiation equilibrium scatter conditions
title_sort comparison of the dose distributions between the brachytherapy (125)i source models, stm1251 and oncoseed 6711, in a geometry lacking radiation equilibrium scatter conditions
topic Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25618137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru088
work_keys_str_mv AT tanakakenichi acomparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT kamokenichi acomparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT tateokakunihiko acomparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT asanumaosamu acomparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT satokaori acomparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT takedahiromitsu acomparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT sakatakohichi acomparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT takadajun acomparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT tanakakenichi comparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT kamokenichi comparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT tateokakunihiko comparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT asanumaosamu comparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT satokaori comparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT takedahiromitsu comparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT sakatakohichi comparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions
AT takadajun comparisonofthedosedistributionsbetweenthebrachytherapy125isourcemodelsstm1251andoncoseed6711inageometrylackingradiationequilibriumscatterconditions