Cargando…

Differences in rates of radiation-induced true and false rib fractures after stereotactic body radiation therapy for Stage I primary lung cancer

The purpose of this study was to analyze the dosimetry and investigate the clinical outcomes of radiation-induced rib fractures (RIRFs) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). A total of 126 patients with Stage I primary lung cancer treated with SBRT, who had undergone follow-up computed tomogr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miura, Hideharu, Inoue, Toshihiko, Shiomi, Hiroya, Oh, Ryoong-Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25504640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru107
_version_ 1782364283093385216
author Miura, Hideharu
Inoue, Toshihiko
Shiomi, Hiroya
Oh, Ryoong-Jin
author_facet Miura, Hideharu
Inoue, Toshihiko
Shiomi, Hiroya
Oh, Ryoong-Jin
author_sort Miura, Hideharu
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to analyze the dosimetry and investigate the clinical outcomes of radiation-induced rib fractures (RIRFs) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). A total of 126 patients with Stage I primary lung cancer treated with SBRT, who had undergone follow-up computed tomography (CT) at least 12 months after SBRT and who had no previous overlapping radiation exposure were included in the study. We used the Mantel–Haenszel method and multiple logistic regression analysis to compare risk factors. We analyzed D(0.5 cm(3)) (minimum absolute dose received by a 0.5-cm(3) volume) and identified each rib that received a biologically effective dose (BED) (BED3, using the linear–quadratic (LQ) formulation assuming an α/β = 3) of at least 50 Gy. Of the 126 patients, 46 (37%) suffered a total of 77 RIRFs. The median interval from SBRT to RIRF detection was 15 months (range, 3–56 months). The 3-year cumulative probabilities were 45% (95% CI, 34–56%) and 3% (95% CI, 0–6%), for Grades 1 and 2 RIRFs, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor location was a statistically significant risk factor for the development of Grade 1 RIRFs. Of the 77 RIRFs, 71 (92%) developed in the true ribs (ribs 1–7), and the remaining six developed in the false ribs (ribs 8–12). The BED3 associated with 10% and 50% probabilities of RIRF were 55 and 210 Gy to the true ribs and 240 and 260 Gy to the false ribs. We conclude that RIRFs develop more frequently in true ribs than in false ribs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4380054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43800542015-04-15 Differences in rates of radiation-induced true and false rib fractures after stereotactic body radiation therapy for Stage I primary lung cancer Miura, Hideharu Inoue, Toshihiko Shiomi, Hiroya Oh, Ryoong-Jin J Radiat Res Oncology The purpose of this study was to analyze the dosimetry and investigate the clinical outcomes of radiation-induced rib fractures (RIRFs) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). A total of 126 patients with Stage I primary lung cancer treated with SBRT, who had undergone follow-up computed tomography (CT) at least 12 months after SBRT and who had no previous overlapping radiation exposure were included in the study. We used the Mantel–Haenszel method and multiple logistic regression analysis to compare risk factors. We analyzed D(0.5 cm(3)) (minimum absolute dose received by a 0.5-cm(3) volume) and identified each rib that received a biologically effective dose (BED) (BED3, using the linear–quadratic (LQ) formulation assuming an α/β = 3) of at least 50 Gy. Of the 126 patients, 46 (37%) suffered a total of 77 RIRFs. The median interval from SBRT to RIRF detection was 15 months (range, 3–56 months). The 3-year cumulative probabilities were 45% (95% CI, 34–56%) and 3% (95% CI, 0–6%), for Grades 1 and 2 RIRFs, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor location was a statistically significant risk factor for the development of Grade 1 RIRFs. Of the 77 RIRFs, 71 (92%) developed in the true ribs (ribs 1–7), and the remaining six developed in the false ribs (ribs 8–12). The BED3 associated with 10% and 50% probabilities of RIRF were 55 and 210 Gy to the true ribs and 240 and 260 Gy to the false ribs. We conclude that RIRFs develop more frequently in true ribs than in false ribs. Oxford University Press 2015-03 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4380054/ /pubmed/25504640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru107 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
spellingShingle Oncology
Miura, Hideharu
Inoue, Toshihiko
Shiomi, Hiroya
Oh, Ryoong-Jin
Differences in rates of radiation-induced true and false rib fractures after stereotactic body radiation therapy for Stage I primary lung cancer
title Differences in rates of radiation-induced true and false rib fractures after stereotactic body radiation therapy for Stage I primary lung cancer
title_full Differences in rates of radiation-induced true and false rib fractures after stereotactic body radiation therapy for Stage I primary lung cancer
title_fullStr Differences in rates of radiation-induced true and false rib fractures after stereotactic body radiation therapy for Stage I primary lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Differences in rates of radiation-induced true and false rib fractures after stereotactic body radiation therapy for Stage I primary lung cancer
title_short Differences in rates of radiation-induced true and false rib fractures after stereotactic body radiation therapy for Stage I primary lung cancer
title_sort differences in rates of radiation-induced true and false rib fractures after stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage i primary lung cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25504640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru107
work_keys_str_mv AT miurahideharu differencesinratesofradiationinducedtrueandfalseribfracturesafterstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforstageiprimarylungcancer
AT inouetoshihiko differencesinratesofradiationinducedtrueandfalseribfracturesafterstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforstageiprimarylungcancer
AT shiomihiroya differencesinratesofradiationinducedtrueandfalseribfracturesafterstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforstageiprimarylungcancer
AT ohryoongjin differencesinratesofradiationinducedtrueandfalseribfracturesafterstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforstageiprimarylungcancer