Cargando…

Evaluation of the Flash effect in breast irradiation using TomoDirect: an investigational study

Flash is a specified function in TomoDirect that enables beam expansion by opening additional leaves to the target. This study assessed the theoretical dose distribution resulting from Flash in breast irradiation using TomoDirect. A cylindrical phantom that enabled dose distribution of the breast wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Dae Gyu, Park, Sung Ill, Kim, Sung Hwan, Chung, Mi Joo, Lee, Kwang-Man, Lee, Jong Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25672612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru118
_version_ 1782364284954607616
author Kang, Dae Gyu
Park, Sung Ill
Kim, Sung Hwan
Chung, Mi Joo
Lee, Kwang-Man
Lee, Jong Hoon
author_facet Kang, Dae Gyu
Park, Sung Ill
Kim, Sung Hwan
Chung, Mi Joo
Lee, Kwang-Man
Lee, Jong Hoon
author_sort Kang, Dae Gyu
collection PubMed
description Flash is a specified function in TomoDirect that enables beam expansion by opening additional leaves to the target. This study assessed the theoretical dose distribution resulting from Flash in breast irradiation using TomoDirect. A cylindrical phantom that enabled dose distribution of the breast was used for verifying the effect of planning target volume (PTV) contouring and Flash. A total of 18 Gy in 10 fractions were prescribed to the PTV. Five PTVs were then created by Contracting this contour by 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm, giving PTV-x. Flash ±x is defined by opening x (number) of the leaves. The Flash effect in the air was compared with each set-up error of 5, 10 and 15 mm, respectively. The minimum PTV dose from PTV-1 to PTV-3 increased from 13.88 Gy to 15.86 Gy. In contrast, D(min) in PTV-4 and PTV-5 was 17.80 Gy in 98.88% of the prescription dose. Without Flash, when 5-, 10- and 15-mm set-up errors applied in the PTV, relative doses of 87.88, 23.73 and 7.94% were observed, respectively. However, in Flash 3, which was equal to the usual air margin of 1.875 cm, a relative dose of 104.24% ± 0.30% was observed, irrespective of set-up errors (5 mm to 15 mm). Flash opening is useful for countervailing set-up errors in breast cancer patients who receive breast irradiation with TomoDirect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4380062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43800622015-04-15 Evaluation of the Flash effect in breast irradiation using TomoDirect: an investigational study Kang, Dae Gyu Park, Sung Ill Kim, Sung Hwan Chung, Mi Joo Lee, Kwang-Man Lee, Jong Hoon J Radiat Res Physics Flash is a specified function in TomoDirect that enables beam expansion by opening additional leaves to the target. This study assessed the theoretical dose distribution resulting from Flash in breast irradiation using TomoDirect. A cylindrical phantom that enabled dose distribution of the breast was used for verifying the effect of planning target volume (PTV) contouring and Flash. A total of 18 Gy in 10 fractions were prescribed to the PTV. Five PTVs were then created by Contracting this contour by 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm, giving PTV-x. Flash ±x is defined by opening x (number) of the leaves. The Flash effect in the air was compared with each set-up error of 5, 10 and 15 mm, respectively. The minimum PTV dose from PTV-1 to PTV-3 increased from 13.88 Gy to 15.86 Gy. In contrast, D(min) in PTV-4 and PTV-5 was 17.80 Gy in 98.88% of the prescription dose. Without Flash, when 5-, 10- and 15-mm set-up errors applied in the PTV, relative doses of 87.88, 23.73 and 7.94% were observed, respectively. However, in Flash 3, which was equal to the usual air margin of 1.875 cm, a relative dose of 104.24% ± 0.30% was observed, irrespective of set-up errors (5 mm to 15 mm). Flash opening is useful for countervailing set-up errors in breast cancer patients who receive breast irradiation with TomoDirect. Oxford University Press 2015-03 2015-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4380062/ /pubmed/25672612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru118 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
spellingShingle Physics
Kang, Dae Gyu
Park, Sung Ill
Kim, Sung Hwan
Chung, Mi Joo
Lee, Kwang-Man
Lee, Jong Hoon
Evaluation of the Flash effect in breast irradiation using TomoDirect: an investigational study
title Evaluation of the Flash effect in breast irradiation using TomoDirect: an investigational study
title_full Evaluation of the Flash effect in breast irradiation using TomoDirect: an investigational study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Flash effect in breast irradiation using TomoDirect: an investigational study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Flash effect in breast irradiation using TomoDirect: an investigational study
title_short Evaluation of the Flash effect in breast irradiation using TomoDirect: an investigational study
title_sort evaluation of the flash effect in breast irradiation using tomodirect: an investigational study
topic Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25672612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru118
work_keys_str_mv AT kangdaegyu evaluationoftheflasheffectinbreastirradiationusingtomodirectaninvestigationalstudy
AT parksungill evaluationoftheflasheffectinbreastirradiationusingtomodirectaninvestigationalstudy
AT kimsunghwan evaluationoftheflasheffectinbreastirradiationusingtomodirectaninvestigationalstudy
AT chungmijoo evaluationoftheflasheffectinbreastirradiationusingtomodirectaninvestigationalstudy
AT leekwangman evaluationoftheflasheffectinbreastirradiationusingtomodirectaninvestigationalstudy
AT leejonghoon evaluationoftheflasheffectinbreastirradiationusingtomodirectaninvestigationalstudy