Cargando…
Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China
BACKGROUND: Transradial approach (TRA) outweighed transfemoral approach (TFA) in acute coronary syndrome patients because the former has better short-term outcomes in high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers. Our study was one of the limited studies specifically in comparing the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118491 |
_version_ | 1782364318750212096 |
---|---|
author | He, Peiyuan Yang, Yuejin Qiao, Shubin Xu, Bo Yao, Min Wu, Yongjian Yuan, Jinqing Chen, Jue Liu, Haibo Dai, Jun Yang, Xiao Tang, Xinran Wang, Yang Li, Wei Gao, Runlin |
author_facet | He, Peiyuan Yang, Yuejin Qiao, Shubin Xu, Bo Yao, Min Wu, Yongjian Yuan, Jinqing Chen, Jue Liu, Haibo Dai, Jun Yang, Xiao Tang, Xinran Wang, Yang Li, Wei Gao, Runlin |
author_sort | He, Peiyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transradial approach (TRA) outweighed transfemoral approach (TFA) in acute coronary syndrome patients because the former has better short-term outcomes in high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers. Our study was one of the limited studies specifically in comparing the short- and medium-term effects of TRA and those of TFA in patients undergoing elective PCIs. METHODS: A total of 21,242 patients who underwent elective PCI with stent implantation were included. Using propensity score methodology, 1,634 patient pairs were matched. Major clinical outcomes and PCI-related complications between TRA and TFA were compared. RESULTS: In the propensity score-matched patients, the rates of in-hospital net adverse clinical events, which included death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke, and major bleeding, were much lower with TRA than with TFA (1.8% vs. 3.9%, P < 0.001). This difference was mainly due to the lower rate of major bleeding (0.6% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001) and the decreased rate of MI (1.1% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.060). PCI-related dissection and thrombosis were similar between the TRA and TFA groups (both P > 0.05). Meanwhile, one-year incidence rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, which included death, MI, and TVR, were also similar (4.1% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.272) in TRA and TFA. Multivariable regression analyses showed that TRA was an independent predictor of the low rate of in-hospital net adverse clinical events (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.71), but not of major adverse cardiovascular events at one-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing elective PCI, TRA patients had lower rates of in-hospital net adverse clinical outcomes compared with TFA patients. TRA might be recommended as a routine approach in high-volume PCI hospitals for elective PCIs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4380354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43803542015-04-09 Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China He, Peiyuan Yang, Yuejin Qiao, Shubin Xu, Bo Yao, Min Wu, Yongjian Yuan, Jinqing Chen, Jue Liu, Haibo Dai, Jun Yang, Xiao Tang, Xinran Wang, Yang Li, Wei Gao, Runlin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Transradial approach (TRA) outweighed transfemoral approach (TFA) in acute coronary syndrome patients because the former has better short-term outcomes in high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers. Our study was one of the limited studies specifically in comparing the short- and medium-term effects of TRA and those of TFA in patients undergoing elective PCIs. METHODS: A total of 21,242 patients who underwent elective PCI with stent implantation were included. Using propensity score methodology, 1,634 patient pairs were matched. Major clinical outcomes and PCI-related complications between TRA and TFA were compared. RESULTS: In the propensity score-matched patients, the rates of in-hospital net adverse clinical events, which included death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke, and major bleeding, were much lower with TRA than with TFA (1.8% vs. 3.9%, P < 0.001). This difference was mainly due to the lower rate of major bleeding (0.6% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001) and the decreased rate of MI (1.1% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.060). PCI-related dissection and thrombosis were similar between the TRA and TFA groups (both P > 0.05). Meanwhile, one-year incidence rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, which included death, MI, and TVR, were also similar (4.1% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.272) in TRA and TFA. Multivariable regression analyses showed that TRA was an independent predictor of the low rate of in-hospital net adverse clinical events (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.71), but not of major adverse cardiovascular events at one-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing elective PCI, TRA patients had lower rates of in-hospital net adverse clinical outcomes compared with TFA patients. TRA might be recommended as a routine approach in high-volume PCI hospitals for elective PCIs. Public Library of Science 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4380354/ /pubmed/25826213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118491 Text en © 2015 He et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article He, Peiyuan Yang, Yuejin Qiao, Shubin Xu, Bo Yao, Min Wu, Yongjian Yuan, Jinqing Chen, Jue Liu, Haibo Dai, Jun Yang, Xiao Tang, Xinran Wang, Yang Li, Wei Gao, Runlin Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China |
title | Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China |
title_full | Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China |
title_short | Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China |
title_sort | comparison of short- and medium-term clinical outcomes between transradial approach and transfemoral approach in a high-volume pci heart center in china |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hepeiyuan comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT yangyuejin comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT qiaoshubin comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT xubo comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT yaomin comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT wuyongjian comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT yuanjinqing comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT chenjue comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT liuhaibo comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT daijun comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT yangxiao comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT tangxinran comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT wangyang comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT liwei comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina AT gaorunlin comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina |