Cargando…

Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China

BACKGROUND: Transradial approach (TRA) outweighed transfemoral approach (TFA) in acute coronary syndrome patients because the former has better short-term outcomes in high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers. Our study was one of the limited studies specifically in comparing the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Peiyuan, Yang, Yuejin, Qiao, Shubin, Xu, Bo, Yao, Min, Wu, Yongjian, Yuan, Jinqing, Chen, Jue, Liu, Haibo, Dai, Jun, Yang, Xiao, Tang, Xinran, Wang, Yang, Li, Wei, Gao, Runlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118491
_version_ 1782364318750212096
author He, Peiyuan
Yang, Yuejin
Qiao, Shubin
Xu, Bo
Yao, Min
Wu, Yongjian
Yuan, Jinqing
Chen, Jue
Liu, Haibo
Dai, Jun
Yang, Xiao
Tang, Xinran
Wang, Yang
Li, Wei
Gao, Runlin
author_facet He, Peiyuan
Yang, Yuejin
Qiao, Shubin
Xu, Bo
Yao, Min
Wu, Yongjian
Yuan, Jinqing
Chen, Jue
Liu, Haibo
Dai, Jun
Yang, Xiao
Tang, Xinran
Wang, Yang
Li, Wei
Gao, Runlin
author_sort He, Peiyuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transradial approach (TRA) outweighed transfemoral approach (TFA) in acute coronary syndrome patients because the former has better short-term outcomes in high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers. Our study was one of the limited studies specifically in comparing the short- and medium-term effects of TRA and those of TFA in patients undergoing elective PCIs. METHODS: A total of 21,242 patients who underwent elective PCI with stent implantation were included. Using propensity score methodology, 1,634 patient pairs were matched. Major clinical outcomes and PCI-related complications between TRA and TFA were compared. RESULTS: In the propensity score-matched patients, the rates of in-hospital net adverse clinical events, which included death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke, and major bleeding, were much lower with TRA than with TFA (1.8% vs. 3.9%, P < 0.001). This difference was mainly due to the lower rate of major bleeding (0.6% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001) and the decreased rate of MI (1.1% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.060). PCI-related dissection and thrombosis were similar between the TRA and TFA groups (both P > 0.05). Meanwhile, one-year incidence rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, which included death, MI, and TVR, were also similar (4.1% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.272) in TRA and TFA. Multivariable regression analyses showed that TRA was an independent predictor of the low rate of in-hospital net adverse clinical events (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.71), but not of major adverse cardiovascular events at one-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing elective PCI, TRA patients had lower rates of in-hospital net adverse clinical outcomes compared with TFA patients. TRA might be recommended as a routine approach in high-volume PCI hospitals for elective PCIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4380354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43803542015-04-09 Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China He, Peiyuan Yang, Yuejin Qiao, Shubin Xu, Bo Yao, Min Wu, Yongjian Yuan, Jinqing Chen, Jue Liu, Haibo Dai, Jun Yang, Xiao Tang, Xinran Wang, Yang Li, Wei Gao, Runlin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Transradial approach (TRA) outweighed transfemoral approach (TFA) in acute coronary syndrome patients because the former has better short-term outcomes in high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers. Our study was one of the limited studies specifically in comparing the short- and medium-term effects of TRA and those of TFA in patients undergoing elective PCIs. METHODS: A total of 21,242 patients who underwent elective PCI with stent implantation were included. Using propensity score methodology, 1,634 patient pairs were matched. Major clinical outcomes and PCI-related complications between TRA and TFA were compared. RESULTS: In the propensity score-matched patients, the rates of in-hospital net adverse clinical events, which included death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke, and major bleeding, were much lower with TRA than with TFA (1.8% vs. 3.9%, P < 0.001). This difference was mainly due to the lower rate of major bleeding (0.6% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001) and the decreased rate of MI (1.1% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.060). PCI-related dissection and thrombosis were similar between the TRA and TFA groups (both P > 0.05). Meanwhile, one-year incidence rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, which included death, MI, and TVR, were also similar (4.1% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.272) in TRA and TFA. Multivariable regression analyses showed that TRA was an independent predictor of the low rate of in-hospital net adverse clinical events (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.71), but not of major adverse cardiovascular events at one-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing elective PCI, TRA patients had lower rates of in-hospital net adverse clinical outcomes compared with TFA patients. TRA might be recommended as a routine approach in high-volume PCI hospitals for elective PCIs. Public Library of Science 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4380354/ /pubmed/25826213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118491 Text en © 2015 He et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
He, Peiyuan
Yang, Yuejin
Qiao, Shubin
Xu, Bo
Yao, Min
Wu, Yongjian
Yuan, Jinqing
Chen, Jue
Liu, Haibo
Dai, Jun
Yang, Xiao
Tang, Xinran
Wang, Yang
Li, Wei
Gao, Runlin
Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China
title Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China
title_full Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China
title_fullStr Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China
title_short Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes between Transradial Approach and Transfemoral Approach in a High-Volume PCI Heart Center in China
title_sort comparison of short- and medium-term clinical outcomes between transradial approach and transfemoral approach in a high-volume pci heart center in china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118491
work_keys_str_mv AT hepeiyuan comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT yangyuejin comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT qiaoshubin comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT xubo comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT yaomin comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT wuyongjian comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT yuanjinqing comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT chenjue comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT liuhaibo comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT daijun comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT yangxiao comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT tangxinran comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT wangyang comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT liwei comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina
AT gaorunlin comparisonofshortandmediumtermclinicaloutcomesbetweentransradialapproachandtransfemoralapproachinahighvolumepciheartcenterinchina