Cargando…

Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EP) vs open prostatectomy (OP) for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We conducted an electronic search of PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to detect all...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Maoyin, Qiu, Jianguang, Hou, Qi, Wang, Dejuan, Huang, Wentao, Hu, Cheng, Li, Ke, Gao, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121265
_version_ 1782364336240459776
author Li, Maoyin
Qiu, Jianguang
Hou, Qi
Wang, Dejuan
Huang, Wentao
Hu, Cheng
Li, Ke
Gao, Xin
author_facet Li, Maoyin
Qiu, Jianguang
Hou, Qi
Wang, Dejuan
Huang, Wentao
Hu, Cheng
Li, Ke
Gao, Xin
author_sort Li, Maoyin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EP) vs open prostatectomy (OP) for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We conducted an electronic search of PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to detect all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EP with OP. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (735 patients) were included. At the 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), quality of life (QoL) score and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) between EP and OP. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was higher with EP (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21 to 1.78, p=0.01) at the 12-month follow-up. The catheterization time (WMD: 3.80 d, 95%CI: -5.11 to -2.48, P<0.00001) and hospital stay (WMD: 4.93 d, 95%CI: -5.96 to -3.89, P<0.00001) were shorter with EP. The duration of operation was longer for EP compared with OP (WMD: 16.21 min, 95%CI: 3.72 to 28.70, P=0.01). The resected tissue weight (WMD: -9.63 g, 95%CI: -14.46 to -4.81, P<0.0001) and decrease in hemoglobin (WMD: -1.14 g/dL, 95%CI: -1.81 to -0.47, P=0.0008) were less with EP. EP was associated with fewer blood transfusions (risk ratio: 0.22, 95%CI: 0.10 to 0.47, P=0.0001). There were no significant differences between EP and OP when comparing other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although only a limited number of RCTs with relatively limited follow-up are available, EP is shown to have a similar postoperative profile and comparable safety to OP. By contrast, EP may have a more desirable perioperative profile. EP appears to be an effective and safe minimally invasive option for treating large prostates that requires only brief convalescence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4380430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43804302015-04-09 Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Li, Maoyin Qiu, Jianguang Hou, Qi Wang, Dejuan Huang, Wentao Hu, Cheng Li, Ke Gao, Xin PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EP) vs open prostatectomy (OP) for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We conducted an electronic search of PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to detect all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EP with OP. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (735 patients) were included. At the 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), quality of life (QoL) score and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) between EP and OP. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was higher with EP (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21 to 1.78, p=0.01) at the 12-month follow-up. The catheterization time (WMD: 3.80 d, 95%CI: -5.11 to -2.48, P<0.00001) and hospital stay (WMD: 4.93 d, 95%CI: -5.96 to -3.89, P<0.00001) were shorter with EP. The duration of operation was longer for EP compared with OP (WMD: 16.21 min, 95%CI: 3.72 to 28.70, P=0.01). The resected tissue weight (WMD: -9.63 g, 95%CI: -14.46 to -4.81, P<0.0001) and decrease in hemoglobin (WMD: -1.14 g/dL, 95%CI: -1.81 to -0.47, P=0.0008) were less with EP. EP was associated with fewer blood transfusions (risk ratio: 0.22, 95%CI: 0.10 to 0.47, P=0.0001). There were no significant differences between EP and OP when comparing other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although only a limited number of RCTs with relatively limited follow-up are available, EP is shown to have a similar postoperative profile and comparable safety to OP. By contrast, EP may have a more desirable perioperative profile. EP appears to be an effective and safe minimally invasive option for treating large prostates that requires only brief convalescence. Public Library of Science 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4380430/ /pubmed/25826453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121265 Text en © 2015 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Maoyin
Qiu, Jianguang
Hou, Qi
Wang, Dejuan
Huang, Wentao
Hu, Cheng
Li, Ke
Gao, Xin
Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort endoscopic enucleation versus open prostatectomy for treating large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121265
work_keys_str_mv AT limaoyin endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT qiujianguang endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT houqi endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangdejuan endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huangwentao endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hucheng endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT like endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT gaoxin endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials