Cargando…
Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EP) vs open prostatectomy (OP) for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We conducted an electronic search of PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to detect all...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121265 |
_version_ | 1782364336240459776 |
---|---|
author | Li, Maoyin Qiu, Jianguang Hou, Qi Wang, Dejuan Huang, Wentao Hu, Cheng Li, Ke Gao, Xin |
author_facet | Li, Maoyin Qiu, Jianguang Hou, Qi Wang, Dejuan Huang, Wentao Hu, Cheng Li, Ke Gao, Xin |
author_sort | Li, Maoyin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EP) vs open prostatectomy (OP) for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We conducted an electronic search of PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to detect all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EP with OP. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (735 patients) were included. At the 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), quality of life (QoL) score and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) between EP and OP. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was higher with EP (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21 to 1.78, p=0.01) at the 12-month follow-up. The catheterization time (WMD: 3.80 d, 95%CI: -5.11 to -2.48, P<0.00001) and hospital stay (WMD: 4.93 d, 95%CI: -5.96 to -3.89, P<0.00001) were shorter with EP. The duration of operation was longer for EP compared with OP (WMD: 16.21 min, 95%CI: 3.72 to 28.70, P=0.01). The resected tissue weight (WMD: -9.63 g, 95%CI: -14.46 to -4.81, P<0.0001) and decrease in hemoglobin (WMD: -1.14 g/dL, 95%CI: -1.81 to -0.47, P=0.0008) were less with EP. EP was associated with fewer blood transfusions (risk ratio: 0.22, 95%CI: 0.10 to 0.47, P=0.0001). There were no significant differences between EP and OP when comparing other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although only a limited number of RCTs with relatively limited follow-up are available, EP is shown to have a similar postoperative profile and comparable safety to OP. By contrast, EP may have a more desirable perioperative profile. EP appears to be an effective and safe minimally invasive option for treating large prostates that requires only brief convalescence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4380430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43804302015-04-09 Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Li, Maoyin Qiu, Jianguang Hou, Qi Wang, Dejuan Huang, Wentao Hu, Cheng Li, Ke Gao, Xin PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EP) vs open prostatectomy (OP) for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We conducted an electronic search of PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to detect all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EP with OP. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (735 patients) were included. At the 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), quality of life (QoL) score and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) between EP and OP. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was higher with EP (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21 to 1.78, p=0.01) at the 12-month follow-up. The catheterization time (WMD: 3.80 d, 95%CI: -5.11 to -2.48, P<0.00001) and hospital stay (WMD: 4.93 d, 95%CI: -5.96 to -3.89, P<0.00001) were shorter with EP. The duration of operation was longer for EP compared with OP (WMD: 16.21 min, 95%CI: 3.72 to 28.70, P=0.01). The resected tissue weight (WMD: -9.63 g, 95%CI: -14.46 to -4.81, P<0.0001) and decrease in hemoglobin (WMD: -1.14 g/dL, 95%CI: -1.81 to -0.47, P=0.0008) were less with EP. EP was associated with fewer blood transfusions (risk ratio: 0.22, 95%CI: 0.10 to 0.47, P=0.0001). There were no significant differences between EP and OP when comparing other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although only a limited number of RCTs with relatively limited follow-up are available, EP is shown to have a similar postoperative profile and comparable safety to OP. By contrast, EP may have a more desirable perioperative profile. EP appears to be an effective and safe minimally invasive option for treating large prostates that requires only brief convalescence. Public Library of Science 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4380430/ /pubmed/25826453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121265 Text en © 2015 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Maoyin Qiu, Jianguang Hou, Qi Wang, Dejuan Huang, Wentao Hu, Cheng Li, Ke Gao, Xin Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Endoscopic Enucleation versus Open Prostatectomy for Treating Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | endoscopic enucleation versus open prostatectomy for treating large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limaoyin endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT qiujianguang endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT houqi endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wangdejuan endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT huangwentao endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hucheng endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT like endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT gaoxin endoscopicenucleationversusopenprostatectomyfortreatinglargebenignprostatichyperplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |