Cargando…

Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy

OBJECTIVES: If the Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) bacterial load is higher in high-risk populations than in the general population, this negatively affects the efficacy of CT screening incentives. In the largest retrospective study to date, we investigated the CT load in specimens collected from 2 cohor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dirks, Jeanne A. M. C., Wolffs, Petra F. G., Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M., Brink, Antoinette A. T. P., Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L., Hoebe, Christian J. P. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121433
_version_ 1782364345191104512
author Dirks, Jeanne A. M. C.
Wolffs, Petra F. G.
Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M.
Brink, Antoinette A. T. P.
Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L.
Hoebe, Christian J. P. A.
author_facet Dirks, Jeanne A. M. C.
Wolffs, Petra F. G.
Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M.
Brink, Antoinette A. T. P.
Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L.
Hoebe, Christian J. P. A.
author_sort Dirks, Jeanne A. M. C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: If the Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) bacterial load is higher in high-risk populations than in the general population, this negatively affects the efficacy of CT screening incentives. In the largest retrospective study to date, we investigated the CT load in specimens collected from 2 cohorts: (1) attendants of a sexually transmitted infection (STI)-clinic and (2) participants of the Dutch population-based screening (PBS). METHODS: CT load was determined using quantitative PCR in CT-positive male urine and female cervicovaginal swabs. CT loads were converted into tertiles. Using multinominal logistic regression, independent association of cohort, symptoms, risk behaviour and human cell count on load were assessed. RESULTS: CT loads were determined in 889 CT-positives from PBS (n = 529; 71.8% female) and STI-clinics (n = 360; 61.7% female). In men, STI-clinic-cohort, human cell count and urethral discharge were positively associated with CT load. In women, PBS-cohort and cell count were positively associated with CT load. Both cohorts had the same range in CT load. CONCLUSIONS: The general population has a similar range of bacterial CT load as a high-risk population, but a different distribution for cohort and gender, highlighting the relevance of population-based CT-screening. When CT loads are similar, possibly the chances of transmission and sequelae are too.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4380475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43804752015-04-09 Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy Dirks, Jeanne A. M. C. Wolffs, Petra F. G. Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M. Brink, Antoinette A. T. P. Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L. Hoebe, Christian J. P. A. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: If the Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) bacterial load is higher in high-risk populations than in the general population, this negatively affects the efficacy of CT screening incentives. In the largest retrospective study to date, we investigated the CT load in specimens collected from 2 cohorts: (1) attendants of a sexually transmitted infection (STI)-clinic and (2) participants of the Dutch population-based screening (PBS). METHODS: CT load was determined using quantitative PCR in CT-positive male urine and female cervicovaginal swabs. CT loads were converted into tertiles. Using multinominal logistic regression, independent association of cohort, symptoms, risk behaviour and human cell count on load were assessed. RESULTS: CT loads were determined in 889 CT-positives from PBS (n = 529; 71.8% female) and STI-clinics (n = 360; 61.7% female). In men, STI-clinic-cohort, human cell count and urethral discharge were positively associated with CT load. In women, PBS-cohort and cell count were positively associated with CT load. Both cohorts had the same range in CT load. CONCLUSIONS: The general population has a similar range of bacterial CT load as a high-risk population, but a different distribution for cohort and gender, highlighting the relevance of population-based CT-screening. When CT loads are similar, possibly the chances of transmission and sequelae are too. Public Library of Science 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4380475/ /pubmed/25826298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121433 Text en © 2015 Dirks et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dirks, Jeanne A. M. C.
Wolffs, Petra F. G.
Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M.
Brink, Antoinette A. T. P.
Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L.
Hoebe, Christian J. P. A.
Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy
title Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy
title_full Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy
title_fullStr Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy
title_full_unstemmed Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy
title_short Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy
title_sort chlamydia trachomatis load in population-based screening and sti-clinics: implications for screening policy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121433
work_keys_str_mv AT dirksjeanneamc chlamydiatrachomatisloadinpopulationbasedscreeningandsticlinicsimplicationsforscreeningpolicy
AT wolffspetrafg chlamydiatrachomatisloadinpopulationbasedscreeningandsticlinicsimplicationsforscreeningpolicy
AT dukersmuijrersnicolehtm chlamydiatrachomatisloadinpopulationbasedscreeningandsticlinicsimplicationsforscreeningpolicy
AT brinkantoinetteatp chlamydiatrachomatisloadinpopulationbasedscreeningandsticlinicsimplicationsforscreeningpolicy
AT speksnijderarjengcl chlamydiatrachomatisloadinpopulationbasedscreeningandsticlinicsimplicationsforscreeningpolicy
AT hoebechristianjpa chlamydiatrachomatisloadinpopulationbasedscreeningandsticlinicsimplicationsforscreeningpolicy