Cargando…
Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy
OBJECTIVES: If the Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) bacterial load is higher in high-risk populations than in the general population, this negatively affects the efficacy of CT screening incentives. In the largest retrospective study to date, we investigated the CT load in specimens collected from 2 cohor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121433 |
_version_ | 1782364345191104512 |
---|---|
author | Dirks, Jeanne A. M. C. Wolffs, Petra F. G. Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M. Brink, Antoinette A. T. P. Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L. Hoebe, Christian J. P. A. |
author_facet | Dirks, Jeanne A. M. C. Wolffs, Petra F. G. Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M. Brink, Antoinette A. T. P. Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L. Hoebe, Christian J. P. A. |
author_sort | Dirks, Jeanne A. M. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: If the Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) bacterial load is higher in high-risk populations than in the general population, this negatively affects the efficacy of CT screening incentives. In the largest retrospective study to date, we investigated the CT load in specimens collected from 2 cohorts: (1) attendants of a sexually transmitted infection (STI)-clinic and (2) participants of the Dutch population-based screening (PBS). METHODS: CT load was determined using quantitative PCR in CT-positive male urine and female cervicovaginal swabs. CT loads were converted into tertiles. Using multinominal logistic regression, independent association of cohort, symptoms, risk behaviour and human cell count on load were assessed. RESULTS: CT loads were determined in 889 CT-positives from PBS (n = 529; 71.8% female) and STI-clinics (n = 360; 61.7% female). In men, STI-clinic-cohort, human cell count and urethral discharge were positively associated with CT load. In women, PBS-cohort and cell count were positively associated with CT load. Both cohorts had the same range in CT load. CONCLUSIONS: The general population has a similar range of bacterial CT load as a high-risk population, but a different distribution for cohort and gender, highlighting the relevance of population-based CT-screening. When CT loads are similar, possibly the chances of transmission and sequelae are too. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4380475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43804752015-04-09 Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy Dirks, Jeanne A. M. C. Wolffs, Petra F. G. Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M. Brink, Antoinette A. T. P. Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L. Hoebe, Christian J. P. A. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: If the Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) bacterial load is higher in high-risk populations than in the general population, this negatively affects the efficacy of CT screening incentives. In the largest retrospective study to date, we investigated the CT load in specimens collected from 2 cohorts: (1) attendants of a sexually transmitted infection (STI)-clinic and (2) participants of the Dutch population-based screening (PBS). METHODS: CT load was determined using quantitative PCR in CT-positive male urine and female cervicovaginal swabs. CT loads were converted into tertiles. Using multinominal logistic regression, independent association of cohort, symptoms, risk behaviour and human cell count on load were assessed. RESULTS: CT loads were determined in 889 CT-positives from PBS (n = 529; 71.8% female) and STI-clinics (n = 360; 61.7% female). In men, STI-clinic-cohort, human cell count and urethral discharge were positively associated with CT load. In women, PBS-cohort and cell count were positively associated with CT load. Both cohorts had the same range in CT load. CONCLUSIONS: The general population has a similar range of bacterial CT load as a high-risk population, but a different distribution for cohort and gender, highlighting the relevance of population-based CT-screening. When CT loads are similar, possibly the chances of transmission and sequelae are too. Public Library of Science 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4380475/ /pubmed/25826298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121433 Text en © 2015 Dirks et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dirks, Jeanne A. M. C. Wolffs, Petra F. G. Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M. Brink, Antoinette A. T. P. Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L. Hoebe, Christian J. P. A. Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy |
title |
Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy |
title_full |
Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy |
title_fullStr |
Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy |
title_short |
Chlamydia trachomatis Load in Population-Based Screening and STI-Clinics: Implications for Screening Policy |
title_sort | chlamydia trachomatis load in population-based screening and sti-clinics: implications for screening policy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dirksjeanneamc chlamydiatrachomatisloadinpopulationbasedscreeningandsticlinicsimplicationsforscreeningpolicy AT wolffspetrafg chlamydiatrachomatisloadinpopulationbasedscreeningandsticlinicsimplicationsforscreeningpolicy AT dukersmuijrersnicolehtm chlamydiatrachomatisloadinpopulationbasedscreeningandsticlinicsimplicationsforscreeningpolicy AT brinkantoinetteatp chlamydiatrachomatisloadinpopulationbasedscreeningandsticlinicsimplicationsforscreeningpolicy AT speksnijderarjengcl chlamydiatrachomatisloadinpopulationbasedscreeningandsticlinicsimplicationsforscreeningpolicy AT hoebechristianjpa chlamydiatrachomatisloadinpopulationbasedscreeningandsticlinicsimplicationsforscreeningpolicy |