Cargando…
Effectiveness of a Worksite-based Weight Loss Randomized Controlled Trial: The WORKSITE Study
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of an individually-targeted Internet-based intervention with monetary incentives (INCENT) at reducing weight of overweight and obese employees when compared to a less-intensive intervention (Livin’ My Weigh [LMW]) 6-months after program initiation. DESIGN AN...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25678325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20899 |
_version_ | 1782364355004727296 |
---|---|
author | Almeida, Fabio A. You, Wen Harden, Samantha M. Blackman, Kacie C. A. Davy, Brenda M. Glasgow, Russell E. Hill, Jennie L. Linnan, Laura A. Wall, Sarah S. Yenerall, Jackie Zoellner, Jamie M. Estabrooks, Paul A. |
author_facet | Almeida, Fabio A. You, Wen Harden, Samantha M. Blackman, Kacie C. A. Davy, Brenda M. Glasgow, Russell E. Hill, Jennie L. Linnan, Laura A. Wall, Sarah S. Yenerall, Jackie Zoellner, Jamie M. Estabrooks, Paul A. |
author_sort | Almeida, Fabio A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of an individually-targeted Internet-based intervention with monetary incentives (INCENT) at reducing weight of overweight and obese employees when compared to a less-intensive intervention (Livin’ My Weigh [LMW]) 6-months after program initiation. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-eight worksites were randomly assigned to either INCENT or LMW conditions. Both programs used evidence-based strategies to support weight loss. INCENT was delivered via daily e-mails over 12 months while LMW was delivered quarterly via both newsletters and onsite educational sessions. Generalized linear mixed models were conducted for weight change from baseline to 6-month post program and using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis to include all participants with baseline weight measurements. RESULTS: Across 28 worksites, 1,790 employees (M=47 years of age; 79% Caucasian; 74% women) participated. Participants lost an average of 2.27 lbs (p<0.001) with a BMI decrease of 0.36 kg/m(2) (p<0.001) and 1.30 lbs (p<0.01) and a BMI decrease of 0.20 kg/m(2) (p<0.01) in INCENT and LMW, respectively. The difference between INCENT and LMW group in weight loss and BMI reduction were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The current study suggests that INCENT and a minimal intervention alternative may be effective approaches to help decrease the overall obesity burden within worksites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4380658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43806582016-04-01 Effectiveness of a Worksite-based Weight Loss Randomized Controlled Trial: The WORKSITE Study Almeida, Fabio A. You, Wen Harden, Samantha M. Blackman, Kacie C. A. Davy, Brenda M. Glasgow, Russell E. Hill, Jennie L. Linnan, Laura A. Wall, Sarah S. Yenerall, Jackie Zoellner, Jamie M. Estabrooks, Paul A. Obesity (Silver Spring) Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of an individually-targeted Internet-based intervention with monetary incentives (INCENT) at reducing weight of overweight and obese employees when compared to a less-intensive intervention (Livin’ My Weigh [LMW]) 6-months after program initiation. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-eight worksites were randomly assigned to either INCENT or LMW conditions. Both programs used evidence-based strategies to support weight loss. INCENT was delivered via daily e-mails over 12 months while LMW was delivered quarterly via both newsletters and onsite educational sessions. Generalized linear mixed models were conducted for weight change from baseline to 6-month post program and using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis to include all participants with baseline weight measurements. RESULTS: Across 28 worksites, 1,790 employees (M=47 years of age; 79% Caucasian; 74% women) participated. Participants lost an average of 2.27 lbs (p<0.001) with a BMI decrease of 0.36 kg/m(2) (p<0.001) and 1.30 lbs (p<0.01) and a BMI decrease of 0.20 kg/m(2) (p<0.01) in INCENT and LMW, respectively. The difference between INCENT and LMW group in weight loss and BMI reduction were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The current study suggests that INCENT and a minimal intervention alternative may be effective approaches to help decrease the overall obesity burden within worksites. 2015-02-12 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4380658/ /pubmed/25678325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20899 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Almeida, Fabio A. You, Wen Harden, Samantha M. Blackman, Kacie C. A. Davy, Brenda M. Glasgow, Russell E. Hill, Jennie L. Linnan, Laura A. Wall, Sarah S. Yenerall, Jackie Zoellner, Jamie M. Estabrooks, Paul A. Effectiveness of a Worksite-based Weight Loss Randomized Controlled Trial: The WORKSITE Study |
title | Effectiveness of a Worksite-based Weight Loss Randomized Controlled Trial: The WORKSITE Study |
title_full | Effectiveness of a Worksite-based Weight Loss Randomized Controlled Trial: The WORKSITE Study |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of a Worksite-based Weight Loss Randomized Controlled Trial: The WORKSITE Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of a Worksite-based Weight Loss Randomized Controlled Trial: The WORKSITE Study |
title_short | Effectiveness of a Worksite-based Weight Loss Randomized Controlled Trial: The WORKSITE Study |
title_sort | effectiveness of a worksite-based weight loss randomized controlled trial: the worksite study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25678325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20899 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almeidafabioa effectivenessofaworksitebasedweightlossrandomizedcontrolledtrialtheworksitestudy AT youwen effectivenessofaworksitebasedweightlossrandomizedcontrolledtrialtheworksitestudy AT hardensamantham effectivenessofaworksitebasedweightlossrandomizedcontrolledtrialtheworksitestudy AT blackmankacieca effectivenessofaworksitebasedweightlossrandomizedcontrolledtrialtheworksitestudy AT davybrendam effectivenessofaworksitebasedweightlossrandomizedcontrolledtrialtheworksitestudy AT glasgowrusselle effectivenessofaworksitebasedweightlossrandomizedcontrolledtrialtheworksitestudy AT hilljenniel effectivenessofaworksitebasedweightlossrandomizedcontrolledtrialtheworksitestudy AT linnanlauraa effectivenessofaworksitebasedweightlossrandomizedcontrolledtrialtheworksitestudy AT wallsarahs effectivenessofaworksitebasedweightlossrandomizedcontrolledtrialtheworksitestudy AT yeneralljackie effectivenessofaworksitebasedweightlossrandomizedcontrolledtrialtheworksitestudy AT zoellnerjamiem effectivenessofaworksitebasedweightlossrandomizedcontrolledtrialtheworksitestudy AT estabrookspaula effectivenessofaworksitebasedweightlossrandomizedcontrolledtrialtheworksitestudy |