Cargando…

Disparities in antidepressant use in pregnancy

BACKGROUND: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Psychiatric Association both recommend pharmacotherapy for perinatal depression when the benefits outweigh the risks. While minority adults are less likely to use antidepressant medications compared to Non-Hispanic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamamoto, Ayae, McCormick, Marie C., Burris, Heather H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25411773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.197
_version_ 1782364359011336192
author Yamamoto, Ayae
McCormick, Marie C.
Burris, Heather H.
author_facet Yamamoto, Ayae
McCormick, Marie C.
Burris, Heather H.
author_sort Yamamoto, Ayae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Psychiatric Association both recommend pharmacotherapy for perinatal depression when the benefits outweigh the risks. While minority adults are less likely to use antidepressant medications compared to Non-Hispanic Whites, whether this pattern occurs among pregnant women is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the frequency of antidepressant medication use reported during ambulatory care visits for pregnant women and whether these rates varied by race. METHODS: We combined the 2006–2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to obtain nationally representative estimates of outpatient preventive care visits for pregnant women. We then obtained estimates of the prevalence of reported depression and antidepressant use during outpatient visits for pregnant women. To determine whether these estimates varied by race, we used multivariable logistic regression analyses accounting for survey design using SAS 9.2 (PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC) to estimate odds ratios of reported antidepressant use after adjustment for age, insurance status and region of the country. RESULTS: Antidepressant use was reported during 2.2% of all outpatient visits for pregnant women. Providers indicated a depression diagnosis in 4.5% of visits. Among visits for depressed pregnant women, providers reported antidepressant use 25.4% of the time for all visits. Antidepressant use during pregnancy varied significantly by race/ethnicity. Among visits for Non-Hispanic White women, 3.1% included a code for antidepressant use vs. just 1.0% for Non-White women (P<0.0001). After adjustment for age, insurance status, and region of the country, this association persisted with Non-Hispanic White (vs. Non-White) pregnant women having higher odds of antidepressant use (adjusted OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.1, 5.3). CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic White women were more likely than Non-White women to be using antidepressants during pregnancy. Whether differences in antidepressant use by race/ethnicity indicates over-treatment of non-Hispanic White women or under-treatment of minorities remains unclear. This disparity warrants investigation with the goal of optimizing maternal mental health while minimizing potential adverse sequelae of antidepressants on developing fetuses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4380708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43807082015-10-01 Disparities in antidepressant use in pregnancy Yamamoto, Ayae McCormick, Marie C. Burris, Heather H. J Perinatol Article BACKGROUND: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Psychiatric Association both recommend pharmacotherapy for perinatal depression when the benefits outweigh the risks. While minority adults are less likely to use antidepressant medications compared to Non-Hispanic Whites, whether this pattern occurs among pregnant women is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the frequency of antidepressant medication use reported during ambulatory care visits for pregnant women and whether these rates varied by race. METHODS: We combined the 2006–2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to obtain nationally representative estimates of outpatient preventive care visits for pregnant women. We then obtained estimates of the prevalence of reported depression and antidepressant use during outpatient visits for pregnant women. To determine whether these estimates varied by race, we used multivariable logistic regression analyses accounting for survey design using SAS 9.2 (PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC) to estimate odds ratios of reported antidepressant use after adjustment for age, insurance status and region of the country. RESULTS: Antidepressant use was reported during 2.2% of all outpatient visits for pregnant women. Providers indicated a depression diagnosis in 4.5% of visits. Among visits for depressed pregnant women, providers reported antidepressant use 25.4% of the time for all visits. Antidepressant use during pregnancy varied significantly by race/ethnicity. Among visits for Non-Hispanic White women, 3.1% included a code for antidepressant use vs. just 1.0% for Non-White women (P<0.0001). After adjustment for age, insurance status, and region of the country, this association persisted with Non-Hispanic White (vs. Non-White) pregnant women having higher odds of antidepressant use (adjusted OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.1, 5.3). CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic White women were more likely than Non-White women to be using antidepressants during pregnancy. Whether differences in antidepressant use by race/ethnicity indicates over-treatment of non-Hispanic White women or under-treatment of minorities remains unclear. This disparity warrants investigation with the goal of optimizing maternal mental health while minimizing potential adverse sequelae of antidepressants on developing fetuses. 2014-11-20 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4380708/ /pubmed/25411773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.197 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Yamamoto, Ayae
McCormick, Marie C.
Burris, Heather H.
Disparities in antidepressant use in pregnancy
title Disparities in antidepressant use in pregnancy
title_full Disparities in antidepressant use in pregnancy
title_fullStr Disparities in antidepressant use in pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Disparities in antidepressant use in pregnancy
title_short Disparities in antidepressant use in pregnancy
title_sort disparities in antidepressant use in pregnancy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25411773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.197
work_keys_str_mv AT yamamotoayae disparitiesinantidepressantuseinpregnancy
AT mccormickmariec disparitiesinantidepressantuseinpregnancy
AT burrisheatherh disparitiesinantidepressantuseinpregnancy