Cargando…

Endometrial disruption does not improve implantation in patients who have failed the transfer of euploid blastocysts

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of single pass outpatient endometrial biopsy in patients at the highest risk for an endometrial cause for failed implantation; those that have failed to conceive despite the transfer of morphologically normal euploid embryos. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Werner, Marie D., Forman, Eric J., Hong, Kathleen H., Franasiak, Jason M., Bergh, Paul A., Scott, Richard T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25627023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0435-0
_version_ 1782364362620534784
author Werner, Marie D.
Forman, Eric J.
Hong, Kathleen H.
Franasiak, Jason M.
Bergh, Paul A.
Scott, Richard T.
author_facet Werner, Marie D.
Forman, Eric J.
Hong, Kathleen H.
Franasiak, Jason M.
Bergh, Paul A.
Scott, Richard T.
author_sort Werner, Marie D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the impact of single pass outpatient endometrial biopsy in patients at the highest risk for an endometrial cause for failed implantation; those that have failed to conceive despite the transfer of morphologically normal euploid embryos. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study consisting of all patients less than 42 years old who failed their first euploid blastocyst transfer and subsequently completed a second transfer cycle of euploid blastocysts. Cycles were analyzed to determine if a single pass endometrial biopsy, termed 'endometrial disruption', was performed in a cycle preceding their second embryo transfer. Transfer outcomes were analyzed and implantation rates calculated. Data analysis was performed to compare outcomes between patients who had endometrial disruption performed versus those that did not. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety patients failed their first euploid embryo transfer and subsequently completed a second euploid embryo transfer and were included. Thirty-nine patients underwent endometrial disruption and 251 did not. There were no statistical differences in clinical implantation rate or sustained implantation rate between the group with endometrial disruption and subjects without any intervention (Clinical IR, 43.6 % vs. 55.0 %, p = 0.13; 38.5 % vs. 42.6 %, p = 0.60). When controlling for transfer order there was no statistical difference noted in implantation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Single pass endometrial biopsy has no impact on endometrial receptivity in the highest risk subgroup- patient's that have failed to sustain the transfer of morphologically normal euploid embryos- as evidenced by equivalent implantation rates. It is possible that variations in technique may alter outcomes and randomized trials are needed to answer this question.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4380894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43808942015-04-10 Endometrial disruption does not improve implantation in patients who have failed the transfer of euploid blastocysts Werner, Marie D. Forman, Eric J. Hong, Kathleen H. Franasiak, Jason M. Bergh, Paul A. Scott, Richard T. J Assist Reprod Genet Assisted Reproduction Technologies PURPOSE: To assess the impact of single pass outpatient endometrial biopsy in patients at the highest risk for an endometrial cause for failed implantation; those that have failed to conceive despite the transfer of morphologically normal euploid embryos. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study consisting of all patients less than 42 years old who failed their first euploid blastocyst transfer and subsequently completed a second transfer cycle of euploid blastocysts. Cycles were analyzed to determine if a single pass endometrial biopsy, termed 'endometrial disruption', was performed in a cycle preceding their second embryo transfer. Transfer outcomes were analyzed and implantation rates calculated. Data analysis was performed to compare outcomes between patients who had endometrial disruption performed versus those that did not. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety patients failed their first euploid embryo transfer and subsequently completed a second euploid embryo transfer and were included. Thirty-nine patients underwent endometrial disruption and 251 did not. There were no statistical differences in clinical implantation rate or sustained implantation rate between the group with endometrial disruption and subjects without any intervention (Clinical IR, 43.6 % vs. 55.0 %, p = 0.13; 38.5 % vs. 42.6 %, p = 0.60). When controlling for transfer order there was no statistical difference noted in implantation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Single pass endometrial biopsy has no impact on endometrial receptivity in the highest risk subgroup- patient's that have failed to sustain the transfer of morphologically normal euploid embryos- as evidenced by equivalent implantation rates. It is possible that variations in technique may alter outcomes and randomized trials are needed to answer this question. Springer US 2015-01-28 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4380894/ /pubmed/25627023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0435-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Assisted Reproduction Technologies
Werner, Marie D.
Forman, Eric J.
Hong, Kathleen H.
Franasiak, Jason M.
Bergh, Paul A.
Scott, Richard T.
Endometrial disruption does not improve implantation in patients who have failed the transfer of euploid blastocysts
title Endometrial disruption does not improve implantation in patients who have failed the transfer of euploid blastocysts
title_full Endometrial disruption does not improve implantation in patients who have failed the transfer of euploid blastocysts
title_fullStr Endometrial disruption does not improve implantation in patients who have failed the transfer of euploid blastocysts
title_full_unstemmed Endometrial disruption does not improve implantation in patients who have failed the transfer of euploid blastocysts
title_short Endometrial disruption does not improve implantation in patients who have failed the transfer of euploid blastocysts
title_sort endometrial disruption does not improve implantation in patients who have failed the transfer of euploid blastocysts
topic Assisted Reproduction Technologies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25627023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0435-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wernermaried endometrialdisruptiondoesnotimproveimplantationinpatientswhohavefailedthetransferofeuploidblastocysts
AT formanericj endometrialdisruptiondoesnotimproveimplantationinpatientswhohavefailedthetransferofeuploidblastocysts
AT hongkathleenh endometrialdisruptiondoesnotimproveimplantationinpatientswhohavefailedthetransferofeuploidblastocysts
AT franasiakjasonm endometrialdisruptiondoesnotimproveimplantationinpatientswhohavefailedthetransferofeuploidblastocysts
AT berghpaula endometrialdisruptiondoesnotimproveimplantationinpatientswhohavefailedthetransferofeuploidblastocysts
AT scottrichardt endometrialdisruptiondoesnotimproveimplantationinpatientswhohavefailedthetransferofeuploidblastocysts