Cargando…

Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be?

The use of antibiotics in agriculture is routinely described as a major contributor to the clinical problem of resistant disease in human medicine. While a link is plausible, there are no data conclusively showing the magnitude of the threat emerging from agriculture. Here, we define the potential m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Qiuzhi, Wang, Weike, Regev-Yochay, Gili, Lipsitch, Marc, Hanage, William P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12185
_version_ 1782364365854343168
author Chang, Qiuzhi
Wang, Weike
Regev-Yochay, Gili
Lipsitch, Marc
Hanage, William P
author_facet Chang, Qiuzhi
Wang, Weike
Regev-Yochay, Gili
Lipsitch, Marc
Hanage, William P
author_sort Chang, Qiuzhi
collection PubMed
description The use of antibiotics in agriculture is routinely described as a major contributor to the clinical problem of resistant disease in human medicine. While a link is plausible, there are no data conclusively showing the magnitude of the threat emerging from agriculture. Here, we define the potential mechanisms by which agricultural antibiotic use could lead to human disease and use case studies to critically assess the potential risk from each. The three mechanisms considered are as follows 1: direct infection with resistant bacteria from an animal source, 2: breaches in the species barrier followed by sustained transmission in humans of resistant strains arising in livestock, and 3: transfer of resistance genes from agriculture into human pathogens. Of these, mechanism 1 is the most readily estimated, while significant is small in comparison with the overall burden of resistant disease. Several cases of mechanism 2 are known, and we discuss the likely livestock origins of resistant clones of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium, but while it is easy to show relatedness the direction of transmission is hard to assess in robust fashion. More difficult yet to study is the contribution of mechanism 3, which may be the most important of all.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4380918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43809182015-04-08 Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be? Chang, Qiuzhi Wang, Weike Regev-Yochay, Gili Lipsitch, Marc Hanage, William P Evol Appl Reviews and Synthesis The use of antibiotics in agriculture is routinely described as a major contributor to the clinical problem of resistant disease in human medicine. While a link is plausible, there are no data conclusively showing the magnitude of the threat emerging from agriculture. Here, we define the potential mechanisms by which agricultural antibiotic use could lead to human disease and use case studies to critically assess the potential risk from each. The three mechanisms considered are as follows 1: direct infection with resistant bacteria from an animal source, 2: breaches in the species barrier followed by sustained transmission in humans of resistant strains arising in livestock, and 3: transfer of resistance genes from agriculture into human pathogens. Of these, mechanism 1 is the most readily estimated, while significant is small in comparison with the overall burden of resistant disease. Several cases of mechanism 2 are known, and we discuss the likely livestock origins of resistant clones of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium, but while it is easy to show relatedness the direction of transmission is hard to assess in robust fashion. More difficult yet to study is the contribution of mechanism 3, which may be the most important of all. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2015-03 2014-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4380918/ /pubmed/25861382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12185 Text en © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews and Synthesis
Chang, Qiuzhi
Wang, Weike
Regev-Yochay, Gili
Lipsitch, Marc
Hanage, William P
Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be?
title Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be?
title_full Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be?
title_fullStr Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be?
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be?
title_short Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be?
title_sort antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be?
topic Reviews and Synthesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12185
work_keys_str_mv AT changqiuzhi antibioticsinagricultureandtherisktohumanhealthhowworriedshouldwebe
AT wangweike antibioticsinagricultureandtherisktohumanhealthhowworriedshouldwebe
AT regevyochaygili antibioticsinagricultureandtherisktohumanhealthhowworriedshouldwebe
AT lipsitchmarc antibioticsinagricultureandtherisktohumanhealthhowworriedshouldwebe
AT hanagewilliamp antibioticsinagricultureandtherisktohumanhealthhowworriedshouldwebe