Cargando…
Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be?
The use of antibiotics in agriculture is routinely described as a major contributor to the clinical problem of resistant disease in human medicine. While a link is plausible, there are no data conclusively showing the magnitude of the threat emerging from agriculture. Here, we define the potential m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12185 |
_version_ | 1782364365854343168 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Qiuzhi Wang, Weike Regev-Yochay, Gili Lipsitch, Marc Hanage, William P |
author_facet | Chang, Qiuzhi Wang, Weike Regev-Yochay, Gili Lipsitch, Marc Hanage, William P |
author_sort | Chang, Qiuzhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of antibiotics in agriculture is routinely described as a major contributor to the clinical problem of resistant disease in human medicine. While a link is plausible, there are no data conclusively showing the magnitude of the threat emerging from agriculture. Here, we define the potential mechanisms by which agricultural antibiotic use could lead to human disease and use case studies to critically assess the potential risk from each. The three mechanisms considered are as follows 1: direct infection with resistant bacteria from an animal source, 2: breaches in the species barrier followed by sustained transmission in humans of resistant strains arising in livestock, and 3: transfer of resistance genes from agriculture into human pathogens. Of these, mechanism 1 is the most readily estimated, while significant is small in comparison with the overall burden of resistant disease. Several cases of mechanism 2 are known, and we discuss the likely livestock origins of resistant clones of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium, but while it is easy to show relatedness the direction of transmission is hard to assess in robust fashion. More difficult yet to study is the contribution of mechanism 3, which may be the most important of all. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4380918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43809182015-04-08 Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be? Chang, Qiuzhi Wang, Weike Regev-Yochay, Gili Lipsitch, Marc Hanage, William P Evol Appl Reviews and Synthesis The use of antibiotics in agriculture is routinely described as a major contributor to the clinical problem of resistant disease in human medicine. While a link is plausible, there are no data conclusively showing the magnitude of the threat emerging from agriculture. Here, we define the potential mechanisms by which agricultural antibiotic use could lead to human disease and use case studies to critically assess the potential risk from each. The three mechanisms considered are as follows 1: direct infection with resistant bacteria from an animal source, 2: breaches in the species barrier followed by sustained transmission in humans of resistant strains arising in livestock, and 3: transfer of resistance genes from agriculture into human pathogens. Of these, mechanism 1 is the most readily estimated, while significant is small in comparison with the overall burden of resistant disease. Several cases of mechanism 2 are known, and we discuss the likely livestock origins of resistant clones of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium, but while it is easy to show relatedness the direction of transmission is hard to assess in robust fashion. More difficult yet to study is the contribution of mechanism 3, which may be the most important of all. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2015-03 2014-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4380918/ /pubmed/25861382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12185 Text en © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews and Synthesis Chang, Qiuzhi Wang, Weike Regev-Yochay, Gili Lipsitch, Marc Hanage, William P Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be? |
title | Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be? |
title_full | Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be? |
title_fullStr | Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be? |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be? |
title_short | Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be? |
title_sort | antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be? |
topic | Reviews and Synthesis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changqiuzhi antibioticsinagricultureandtherisktohumanhealthhowworriedshouldwebe AT wangweike antibioticsinagricultureandtherisktohumanhealthhowworriedshouldwebe AT regevyochaygili antibioticsinagricultureandtherisktohumanhealthhowworriedshouldwebe AT lipsitchmarc antibioticsinagricultureandtherisktohumanhealthhowworriedshouldwebe AT hanagewilliamp antibioticsinagricultureandtherisktohumanhealthhowworriedshouldwebe |