Cargando…

Linking a research register to clinical records in older adults’ mental health services: a mixed-methods study

INTRODUCTION: Patients can provide consent to have their clinical records linked to a research register, a process known as consent for contact (C4C). There is evidence about how to engage people with mental illness in C4C, but nothing specific to older adults. This is a priority area for research (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robotham, Dan, Evans, Joanne, Watson, Andrew, Perdue, Iain, Craig, Thomas, Rose, Diana, Wykes, Til
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4381414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-015-0103-8
_version_ 1782364451521953792
author Robotham, Dan
Evans, Joanne
Watson, Andrew
Perdue, Iain
Craig, Thomas
Rose, Diana
Wykes, Til
author_facet Robotham, Dan
Evans, Joanne
Watson, Andrew
Perdue, Iain
Craig, Thomas
Rose, Diana
Wykes, Til
author_sort Robotham, Dan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients can provide consent to have their clinical records linked to a research register, a process known as consent for contact (C4C). There is evidence about how to engage people with mental illness in C4C, but nothing specific to older adults. This is a priority area for research (for example, dementia trials), although sign-up rates to C4C are lower than for younger populations. Through this study we seek to understand these disparities. METHODS: This was a two-stage cross-sectional observational study. In phase one, focus groups with service users, carers and clinicians informed a framework for clinicians to explain C4C to those on their caseload. In phase two, clinicians explained C4C to 26 service users (and carers where applicable). These conversations were recorded, and their content was analysed. Service users and carers were then interviewed to provide further feedback on their conversations with clinicians. A total of 31 service users, 24 carers and 13 clinical staff took part across the two phases. RESULTS: In phase one, service users and carers sought assurance of the right to refuse participation in further studies (after joining C4C). Clinicians expressed concerns over legal and practical implications of ascertaining mental capacity and best interest. In phase two, clinicians’ explanations were less thorough than similar explanations given to younger adults with psychosis. Clinicians omitted details of service users’ right to stipulate contact arrangements, which was significantly associated with whether service users/carers agreed to join. Common reasons for joining C4C included altruism and the chance to speak to new people. Few participants refused to join, but reasons included avoidance of stress (potentially alleviated through the presence of a carer). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing C4C in older adults’ services requires clinicians to deliver concise, simple explanations to individuals and their carers where applicable. Older adults can be suspicious of unsolicited contact; thus, explanations must emphasise freedom to negotiate suitable contact arrangements. Hearing about research opportunities can be in the best interests of older adults, but communicating these opportunities requires a tailored approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4381414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43814142015-04-02 Linking a research register to clinical records in older adults’ mental health services: a mixed-methods study Robotham, Dan Evans, Joanne Watson, Andrew Perdue, Iain Craig, Thomas Rose, Diana Wykes, Til Alzheimers Res Ther Research INTRODUCTION: Patients can provide consent to have their clinical records linked to a research register, a process known as consent for contact (C4C). There is evidence about how to engage people with mental illness in C4C, but nothing specific to older adults. This is a priority area for research (for example, dementia trials), although sign-up rates to C4C are lower than for younger populations. Through this study we seek to understand these disparities. METHODS: This was a two-stage cross-sectional observational study. In phase one, focus groups with service users, carers and clinicians informed a framework for clinicians to explain C4C to those on their caseload. In phase two, clinicians explained C4C to 26 service users (and carers where applicable). These conversations were recorded, and their content was analysed. Service users and carers were then interviewed to provide further feedback on their conversations with clinicians. A total of 31 service users, 24 carers and 13 clinical staff took part across the two phases. RESULTS: In phase one, service users and carers sought assurance of the right to refuse participation in further studies (after joining C4C). Clinicians expressed concerns over legal and practical implications of ascertaining mental capacity and best interest. In phase two, clinicians’ explanations were less thorough than similar explanations given to younger adults with psychosis. Clinicians omitted details of service users’ right to stipulate contact arrangements, which was significantly associated with whether service users/carers agreed to join. Common reasons for joining C4C included altruism and the chance to speak to new people. Few participants refused to join, but reasons included avoidance of stress (potentially alleviated through the presence of a carer). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing C4C in older adults’ services requires clinicians to deliver concise, simple explanations to individuals and their carers where applicable. Older adults can be suspicious of unsolicited contact; thus, explanations must emphasise freedom to negotiate suitable contact arrangements. Hearing about research opportunities can be in the best interests of older adults, but communicating these opportunities requires a tailored approach. BioMed Central 2015-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4381414/ /pubmed/25834643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-015-0103-8 Text en © Robotham et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Robotham, Dan
Evans, Joanne
Watson, Andrew
Perdue, Iain
Craig, Thomas
Rose, Diana
Wykes, Til
Linking a research register to clinical records in older adults’ mental health services: a mixed-methods study
title Linking a research register to clinical records in older adults’ mental health services: a mixed-methods study
title_full Linking a research register to clinical records in older adults’ mental health services: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Linking a research register to clinical records in older adults’ mental health services: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Linking a research register to clinical records in older adults’ mental health services: a mixed-methods study
title_short Linking a research register to clinical records in older adults’ mental health services: a mixed-methods study
title_sort linking a research register to clinical records in older adults’ mental health services: a mixed-methods study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4381414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-015-0103-8
work_keys_str_mv AT robothamdan linkingaresearchregistertoclinicalrecordsinolderadultsmentalhealthservicesamixedmethodsstudy
AT evansjoanne linkingaresearchregistertoclinicalrecordsinolderadultsmentalhealthservicesamixedmethodsstudy
AT watsonandrew linkingaresearchregistertoclinicalrecordsinolderadultsmentalhealthservicesamixedmethodsstudy
AT perdueiain linkingaresearchregistertoclinicalrecordsinolderadultsmentalhealthservicesamixedmethodsstudy
AT craigthomas linkingaresearchregistertoclinicalrecordsinolderadultsmentalhealthservicesamixedmethodsstudy
AT rosediana linkingaresearchregistertoclinicalrecordsinolderadultsmentalhealthservicesamixedmethodsstudy
AT wykestil linkingaresearchregistertoclinicalrecordsinolderadultsmentalhealthservicesamixedmethodsstudy