Cargando…

The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data

BACKGROUND: Spurred by success in several foci, onchocerciasis control policy in Africa has shifted from morbidity control to elimination of infection. Clinical trials have demonstrated that moxidectin is substantially more efficacious than ivermectin in effecting sustained reductions in skin microf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner, Hugo C, Walker, Martin, Attah, Simon K, Opoku, Nicholas O, Awadzi, Kwablah, Kuesel, Annette C, Basáñez, María-Gloria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4381491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0779-4
_version_ 1782364461351305216
author Turner, Hugo C
Walker, Martin
Attah, Simon K
Opoku, Nicholas O
Awadzi, Kwablah
Kuesel, Annette C
Basáñez, María-Gloria
author_facet Turner, Hugo C
Walker, Martin
Attah, Simon K
Opoku, Nicholas O
Awadzi, Kwablah
Kuesel, Annette C
Basáñez, María-Gloria
author_sort Turner, Hugo C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spurred by success in several foci, onchocerciasis control policy in Africa has shifted from morbidity control to elimination of infection. Clinical trials have demonstrated that moxidectin is substantially more efficacious than ivermectin in effecting sustained reductions in skin microfilarial load and, therefore, may accelerate progress towards elimination. We compare the potential cost-effectiveness of annual moxidectin with annual and biannual ivermectin treatment. METHODS: Data from the first clinical study of moxidectin were used to parameterise the onchocerciasis transmission model EPIONCHO to investigate, for different epidemiological and programmatic scenarios in African savannah settings, the number of years and in-country costs necessary to reach the operational thresholds for cessation of treatment, comparing annual and biannual ivermectin with annual moxidectin treatment. RESULTS: Annual moxidectin and biannual ivermectin treatment would achieve similar reductions in programme duration relative to annual ivermectin treatment. Unlike biannual ivermectin treatment, annual moxidectin treatment would not incur a considerable increase in programmatic costs and, therefore, would generate sizeable in-country cost savings (assuming the drug is donated). Furthermore, the impact of moxidectin, unlike ivermectin, was not substantively influenced by the timing of treatment relative to seasonal patterns of transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Moxidectin is a promising new drug for the control and elimination of onchocerciasis. It has high programmatic value particularly when resource limitation prevents a biannual treatment strategy, or optimal timing of treatment relative to peak transmission season is not feasible. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13071-015-0779-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4381491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43814912015-04-02 The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data Turner, Hugo C Walker, Martin Attah, Simon K Opoku, Nicholas O Awadzi, Kwablah Kuesel, Annette C Basáñez, María-Gloria Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Spurred by success in several foci, onchocerciasis control policy in Africa has shifted from morbidity control to elimination of infection. Clinical trials have demonstrated that moxidectin is substantially more efficacious than ivermectin in effecting sustained reductions in skin microfilarial load and, therefore, may accelerate progress towards elimination. We compare the potential cost-effectiveness of annual moxidectin with annual and biannual ivermectin treatment. METHODS: Data from the first clinical study of moxidectin were used to parameterise the onchocerciasis transmission model EPIONCHO to investigate, for different epidemiological and programmatic scenarios in African savannah settings, the number of years and in-country costs necessary to reach the operational thresholds for cessation of treatment, comparing annual and biannual ivermectin with annual moxidectin treatment. RESULTS: Annual moxidectin and biannual ivermectin treatment would achieve similar reductions in programme duration relative to annual ivermectin treatment. Unlike biannual ivermectin treatment, annual moxidectin treatment would not incur a considerable increase in programmatic costs and, therefore, would generate sizeable in-country cost savings (assuming the drug is donated). Furthermore, the impact of moxidectin, unlike ivermectin, was not substantively influenced by the timing of treatment relative to seasonal patterns of transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Moxidectin is a promising new drug for the control and elimination of onchocerciasis. It has high programmatic value particularly when resource limitation prevents a biannual treatment strategy, or optimal timing of treatment relative to peak transmission season is not feasible. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13071-015-0779-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4381491/ /pubmed/25889256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0779-4 Text en © Turner et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Turner, Hugo C
Walker, Martin
Attah, Simon K
Opoku, Nicholas O
Awadzi, Kwablah
Kuesel, Annette C
Basáñez, María-Gloria
The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data
title The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data
title_full The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data
title_fullStr The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data
title_full_unstemmed The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data
title_short The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data
title_sort potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in africa: an economic evaluation based on the phase ii clinical trial data
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4381491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0779-4
work_keys_str_mv AT turnerhugoc thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT walkermartin thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT attahsimonk thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT opokunicholaso thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT awadzikwablah thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT kueselannettec thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT basanezmariagloria thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT turnerhugoc potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT walkermartin potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT attahsimonk potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT opokunicholaso potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT awadzikwablah potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT kueselannettec potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata
AT basanezmariagloria potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata