Cargando…
The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data
BACKGROUND: Spurred by success in several foci, onchocerciasis control policy in Africa has shifted from morbidity control to elimination of infection. Clinical trials have demonstrated that moxidectin is substantially more efficacious than ivermectin in effecting sustained reductions in skin microf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4381491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0779-4 |
_version_ | 1782364461351305216 |
---|---|
author | Turner, Hugo C Walker, Martin Attah, Simon K Opoku, Nicholas O Awadzi, Kwablah Kuesel, Annette C Basáñez, María-Gloria |
author_facet | Turner, Hugo C Walker, Martin Attah, Simon K Opoku, Nicholas O Awadzi, Kwablah Kuesel, Annette C Basáñez, María-Gloria |
author_sort | Turner, Hugo C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Spurred by success in several foci, onchocerciasis control policy in Africa has shifted from morbidity control to elimination of infection. Clinical trials have demonstrated that moxidectin is substantially more efficacious than ivermectin in effecting sustained reductions in skin microfilarial load and, therefore, may accelerate progress towards elimination. We compare the potential cost-effectiveness of annual moxidectin with annual and biannual ivermectin treatment. METHODS: Data from the first clinical study of moxidectin were used to parameterise the onchocerciasis transmission model EPIONCHO to investigate, for different epidemiological and programmatic scenarios in African savannah settings, the number of years and in-country costs necessary to reach the operational thresholds for cessation of treatment, comparing annual and biannual ivermectin with annual moxidectin treatment. RESULTS: Annual moxidectin and biannual ivermectin treatment would achieve similar reductions in programme duration relative to annual ivermectin treatment. Unlike biannual ivermectin treatment, annual moxidectin treatment would not incur a considerable increase in programmatic costs and, therefore, would generate sizeable in-country cost savings (assuming the drug is donated). Furthermore, the impact of moxidectin, unlike ivermectin, was not substantively influenced by the timing of treatment relative to seasonal patterns of transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Moxidectin is a promising new drug for the control and elimination of onchocerciasis. It has high programmatic value particularly when resource limitation prevents a biannual treatment strategy, or optimal timing of treatment relative to peak transmission season is not feasible. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13071-015-0779-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4381491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43814912015-04-02 The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data Turner, Hugo C Walker, Martin Attah, Simon K Opoku, Nicholas O Awadzi, Kwablah Kuesel, Annette C Basáñez, María-Gloria Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Spurred by success in several foci, onchocerciasis control policy in Africa has shifted from morbidity control to elimination of infection. Clinical trials have demonstrated that moxidectin is substantially more efficacious than ivermectin in effecting sustained reductions in skin microfilarial load and, therefore, may accelerate progress towards elimination. We compare the potential cost-effectiveness of annual moxidectin with annual and biannual ivermectin treatment. METHODS: Data from the first clinical study of moxidectin were used to parameterise the onchocerciasis transmission model EPIONCHO to investigate, for different epidemiological and programmatic scenarios in African savannah settings, the number of years and in-country costs necessary to reach the operational thresholds for cessation of treatment, comparing annual and biannual ivermectin with annual moxidectin treatment. RESULTS: Annual moxidectin and biannual ivermectin treatment would achieve similar reductions in programme duration relative to annual ivermectin treatment. Unlike biannual ivermectin treatment, annual moxidectin treatment would not incur a considerable increase in programmatic costs and, therefore, would generate sizeable in-country cost savings (assuming the drug is donated). Furthermore, the impact of moxidectin, unlike ivermectin, was not substantively influenced by the timing of treatment relative to seasonal patterns of transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Moxidectin is a promising new drug for the control and elimination of onchocerciasis. It has high programmatic value particularly when resource limitation prevents a biannual treatment strategy, or optimal timing of treatment relative to peak transmission season is not feasible. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13071-015-0779-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4381491/ /pubmed/25889256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0779-4 Text en © Turner et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Turner, Hugo C Walker, Martin Attah, Simon K Opoku, Nicholas O Awadzi, Kwablah Kuesel, Annette C Basáñez, María-Gloria The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data |
title | The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data |
title_full | The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data |
title_fullStr | The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data |
title_full_unstemmed | The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data |
title_short | The potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: an economic evaluation based on the Phase II clinical trial data |
title_sort | potential impact of moxidectin on onchocerciasis elimination in africa: an economic evaluation based on the phase ii clinical trial data |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4381491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0779-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turnerhugoc thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT walkermartin thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT attahsimonk thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT opokunicholaso thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT awadzikwablah thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT kueselannettec thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT basanezmariagloria thepotentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT turnerhugoc potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT walkermartin potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT attahsimonk potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT opokunicholaso potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT awadzikwablah potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT kueselannettec potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata AT basanezmariagloria potentialimpactofmoxidectinononchocerciasiseliminationinafricaaneconomicevaluationbasedonthephaseiiclinicaltrialdata |