Cargando…

Joint annotation of chromatin state and chromatin conformation reveals relationships among domain types and identifies domains of cell-type-specific expression

The genomic neighborhood of a gene influences its activity, a behavior that is attributable in part to domain-scale regulation. Previous genomic studies have identified many types of regulatory domains. However, due to the difficulty of integrating genomics data sets, the relationships among these d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Libbrecht, Maxwell W., Ay, Ferhat, Hoffman, Michael M., Gilbert, David M., Bilmes, Jeffrey A., Noble, William Stafford
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4381526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25677182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.184341.114
_version_ 1782364469516566528
author Libbrecht, Maxwell W.
Ay, Ferhat
Hoffman, Michael M.
Gilbert, David M.
Bilmes, Jeffrey A.
Noble, William Stafford
author_facet Libbrecht, Maxwell W.
Ay, Ferhat
Hoffman, Michael M.
Gilbert, David M.
Bilmes, Jeffrey A.
Noble, William Stafford
author_sort Libbrecht, Maxwell W.
collection PubMed
description The genomic neighborhood of a gene influences its activity, a behavior that is attributable in part to domain-scale regulation. Previous genomic studies have identified many types of regulatory domains. However, due to the difficulty of integrating genomics data sets, the relationships among these domain types are poorly understood. Semi-automated genome annotation (SAGA) algorithms facilitate human interpretation of heterogeneous collections of genomics data by simultaneously partitioning the human genome and assigning labels to the resulting genomic segments. However, existing SAGA methods cannot integrate inherently pairwise chromatin conformation data. We developed a new computational method, called graph-based regularization (GBR), for expressing a pairwise prior that encourages certain pairs of genomic loci to receive the same label in a genome annotation. We used GBR to exploit chromatin conformation information during genome annotation by encouraging positions that are close in 3D to occupy the same type of domain. Using this approach, we produced a model of chromatin domains in eight human cell types, thereby revealing the relationships among known domain types. Through this model, we identified clusters of tightly regulated genes expressed in only a small number of cell types, which we term “specific expression domains.” We found that domain boundaries marked by promoters and CTCF motifs are consistent between cell types even when domain activity changes. Finally, we showed that GBR can be used to transfer information from well-studied cell types to less well-characterized cell types during genome annotation, making it possible to produce high-quality annotations of the hundreds of cell types with limited available data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4381526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43815262015-10-01 Joint annotation of chromatin state and chromatin conformation reveals relationships among domain types and identifies domains of cell-type-specific expression Libbrecht, Maxwell W. Ay, Ferhat Hoffman, Michael M. Gilbert, David M. Bilmes, Jeffrey A. Noble, William Stafford Genome Res Method The genomic neighborhood of a gene influences its activity, a behavior that is attributable in part to domain-scale regulation. Previous genomic studies have identified many types of regulatory domains. However, due to the difficulty of integrating genomics data sets, the relationships among these domain types are poorly understood. Semi-automated genome annotation (SAGA) algorithms facilitate human interpretation of heterogeneous collections of genomics data by simultaneously partitioning the human genome and assigning labels to the resulting genomic segments. However, existing SAGA methods cannot integrate inherently pairwise chromatin conformation data. We developed a new computational method, called graph-based regularization (GBR), for expressing a pairwise prior that encourages certain pairs of genomic loci to receive the same label in a genome annotation. We used GBR to exploit chromatin conformation information during genome annotation by encouraging positions that are close in 3D to occupy the same type of domain. Using this approach, we produced a model of chromatin domains in eight human cell types, thereby revealing the relationships among known domain types. Through this model, we identified clusters of tightly regulated genes expressed in only a small number of cell types, which we term “specific expression domains.” We found that domain boundaries marked by promoters and CTCF motifs are consistent between cell types even when domain activity changes. Finally, we showed that GBR can be used to transfer information from well-studied cell types to less well-characterized cell types during genome annotation, making it possible to produce high-quality annotations of the hundreds of cell types with limited available data. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4381526/ /pubmed/25677182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.184341.114 Text en © 2015 Libbrecht et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Method
Libbrecht, Maxwell W.
Ay, Ferhat
Hoffman, Michael M.
Gilbert, David M.
Bilmes, Jeffrey A.
Noble, William Stafford
Joint annotation of chromatin state and chromatin conformation reveals relationships among domain types and identifies domains of cell-type-specific expression
title Joint annotation of chromatin state and chromatin conformation reveals relationships among domain types and identifies domains of cell-type-specific expression
title_full Joint annotation of chromatin state and chromatin conformation reveals relationships among domain types and identifies domains of cell-type-specific expression
title_fullStr Joint annotation of chromatin state and chromatin conformation reveals relationships among domain types and identifies domains of cell-type-specific expression
title_full_unstemmed Joint annotation of chromatin state and chromatin conformation reveals relationships among domain types and identifies domains of cell-type-specific expression
title_short Joint annotation of chromatin state and chromatin conformation reveals relationships among domain types and identifies domains of cell-type-specific expression
title_sort joint annotation of chromatin state and chromatin conformation reveals relationships among domain types and identifies domains of cell-type-specific expression
topic Method
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4381526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25677182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.184341.114
work_keys_str_mv AT libbrechtmaxwellw jointannotationofchromatinstateandchromatinconformationrevealsrelationshipsamongdomaintypesandidentifiesdomainsofcelltypespecificexpression
AT ayferhat jointannotationofchromatinstateandchromatinconformationrevealsrelationshipsamongdomaintypesandidentifiesdomainsofcelltypespecificexpression
AT hoffmanmichaelm jointannotationofchromatinstateandchromatinconformationrevealsrelationshipsamongdomaintypesandidentifiesdomainsofcelltypespecificexpression
AT gilbertdavidm jointannotationofchromatinstateandchromatinconformationrevealsrelationshipsamongdomaintypesandidentifiesdomainsofcelltypespecificexpression
AT bilmesjeffreya jointannotationofchromatinstateandchromatinconformationrevealsrelationshipsamongdomaintypesandidentifiesdomainsofcelltypespecificexpression
AT noblewilliamstafford jointannotationofchromatinstateandchromatinconformationrevealsrelationshipsamongdomaintypesandidentifiesdomainsofcelltypespecificexpression