Cargando…
Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study
Objective To test the equivalence for clinical effectiveness between microdecompression and laminectomy in patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis. Design Multicentre observational study. Setting Prospective data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Participants 885 patients with cent...
Autores principales: | Nerland, Ulf S, Jakola, Asgeir S, Solheim, Ole, Weber, Clemens, Rao, Vidar, Lønne, Greger, Solberg, Tore K, Salvesen, Øyvind, Carlsen, Sven M, Nygaard, Øystein P, Gulati, Sasha |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4381635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25833966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1603 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparative effectiveness of microdecompression and laminectomy for central lumbar spinal stenosis: study protocol for an observational study
por: Nerland, Ulf S, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study
por: Jakola, Asgeir S, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Open discectomy vs microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation - a protocol for
a pragmatic comparative effectiveness study
por: Sørlie, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of Morphological Grading for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
por: Weber, Clemens, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Surgery for herniated lumbar disc in private vs public hospitals: A pragmatic comparative effectiveness study
por: Madsbu, Mattis A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)