Cargando…
Evaluating Outcomes Used in Cardiothoracic Surgery Interventional Research: A Systematic Review of Reviews to Develop a Core Outcome Set
BACKGROUND: When planning clinical trials, it is a key element to choose appropriate outcomes that ensure the comparability of effects of interventions in ways that minimise bias. We hypothesise that outcome measures in cardiothoracic surgical trials are inconsistent and without standard. Therefore,...
Autores principales: | Benstoem, Carina, Moza, Ajay, Autschbach, Rüdiger, Stoppe, Christian, Goetzenich, Andreas |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4382223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25830921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122204 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A minimum core outcome set for clinical trials on non-minimal-invasive off- or on-pump cardiothoracic surgery
por: Benstöm, Carina, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
A core outcome set for adult cardiac surgery trials: A consensus study
por: Benstoem, Carina, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
A core outcome set for all types of cardiac surgery effectiveness trials: a study protocol for an international eDelphi survey to achieve consensus on what to measure and the subsequent selection of measurement instruments
por: Moza, A., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Retrospective Analysis of Air Handling by Contemporary Oxygenators in the Setting of Cardiac Surgery
por: Benstoem, Carina, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Evaluation of the cardioprotective potential of extracellular vesicles – a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Wendt, Sebastian, et al.
Publicado: (2018)