Cargando…

Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device

BACKGROUND: Lumbar interbody fusion is a common treatment for a variety of spinal pathologies. It has been hypothesized that insufficient mechanical loading of the interbody graft can prevent proper fusion of the joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical stability and anterior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, Daniel J., Yeager, Matthew S., Thampi, Shankar S., Whiting, Donald M., Cheng, Boyle C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4382751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26131403
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/2009
_version_ 1782364626045894656
author Cook, Daniel J.
Yeager, Matthew S.
Thampi, Shankar S.
Whiting, Donald M.
Cheng, Boyle C.
author_facet Cook, Daniel J.
Yeager, Matthew S.
Thampi, Shankar S.
Whiting, Donald M.
Cheng, Boyle C.
author_sort Cook, Daniel J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lumbar interbody fusion is a common treatment for a variety of spinal pathologies. It has been hypothesized that insufficient mechanical loading of the interbody graft can prevent proper fusion of the joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical stability and anterior column loading sharing characteristics of a posterior dynamic system compared to titanium rods in an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) model. METHODS: Range of motion, interpedicular kinematics and interbody graft loading were measured in human cadaveric lumbar segments tested under a pure moment flexibility testing protocol. RESULTS: Both systems provided significant fixation compared to the intact condition and to an interbody spacer alone in flexion extension and lateral bending. No significant differences in fixation were detected between the devices. A significant decrease in graft loading was detected in flexion for the titanium rod treatment compared to spacer alone. No significant differences in graft loading were detected between the spacer alone and posterior dynamic system or between the posterior dynamic system and the titanium rod. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the posterior dynamic system provides similar fixation compared to that of a titanium rod, however, studies designed to evaluate the efficacy of fixation in a cadaver model may not be sufficiently powered to establish differences in load sharing using the techniques described here.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4382751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43827512015-06-30 Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device Cook, Daniel J. Yeager, Matthew S. Thampi, Shankar S. Whiting, Donald M. Cheng, Boyle C. Int J Spine Surg Articles BACKGROUND: Lumbar interbody fusion is a common treatment for a variety of spinal pathologies. It has been hypothesized that insufficient mechanical loading of the interbody graft can prevent proper fusion of the joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical stability and anterior column loading sharing characteristics of a posterior dynamic system compared to titanium rods in an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) model. METHODS: Range of motion, interpedicular kinematics and interbody graft loading were measured in human cadaveric lumbar segments tested under a pure moment flexibility testing protocol. RESULTS: Both systems provided significant fixation compared to the intact condition and to an interbody spacer alone in flexion extension and lateral bending. No significant differences in fixation were detected between the devices. A significant decrease in graft loading was detected in flexion for the titanium rod treatment compared to spacer alone. No significant differences in graft loading were detected between the spacer alone and posterior dynamic system or between the posterior dynamic system and the titanium rod. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the posterior dynamic system provides similar fixation compared to that of a titanium rod, however, studies designed to evaluate the efficacy of fixation in a cadaver model may not be sufficiently powered to establish differences in load sharing using the techniques described here. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2015-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4382751/ /pubmed/26131403 http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/2009 Text en Copyright © 2015 ISASS - This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Copyright © 2015 ISASS.
spellingShingle Articles
Cook, Daniel J.
Yeager, Matthew S.
Thampi, Shankar S.
Whiting, Donald M.
Cheng, Boyle C.
Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device
title Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device
title_full Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device
title_fullStr Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device
title_full_unstemmed Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device
title_short Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device
title_sort stability and load sharing characteristics of a posterior dynamic stabilization device
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4382751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26131403
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/2009
work_keys_str_mv AT cookdanielj stabilityandloadsharingcharacteristicsofaposteriordynamicstabilizationdevice
AT yeagermatthews stabilityandloadsharingcharacteristicsofaposteriordynamicstabilizationdevice
AT thampishankars stabilityandloadsharingcharacteristicsofaposteriordynamicstabilizationdevice
AT whitingdonaldm stabilityandloadsharingcharacteristicsofaposteriordynamicstabilizationdevice
AT chengboylec stabilityandloadsharingcharacteristicsofaposteriordynamicstabilizationdevice