Cargando…
Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device
BACKGROUND: Lumbar interbody fusion is a common treatment for a variety of spinal pathologies. It has been hypothesized that insufficient mechanical loading of the interbody graft can prevent proper fusion of the joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical stability and anterior...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4382751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26131403 http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/2009 |
_version_ | 1782364626045894656 |
---|---|
author | Cook, Daniel J. Yeager, Matthew S. Thampi, Shankar S. Whiting, Donald M. Cheng, Boyle C. |
author_facet | Cook, Daniel J. Yeager, Matthew S. Thampi, Shankar S. Whiting, Donald M. Cheng, Boyle C. |
author_sort | Cook, Daniel J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lumbar interbody fusion is a common treatment for a variety of spinal pathologies. It has been hypothesized that insufficient mechanical loading of the interbody graft can prevent proper fusion of the joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical stability and anterior column loading sharing characteristics of a posterior dynamic system compared to titanium rods in an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) model. METHODS: Range of motion, interpedicular kinematics and interbody graft loading were measured in human cadaveric lumbar segments tested under a pure moment flexibility testing protocol. RESULTS: Both systems provided significant fixation compared to the intact condition and to an interbody spacer alone in flexion extension and lateral bending. No significant differences in fixation were detected between the devices. A significant decrease in graft loading was detected in flexion for the titanium rod treatment compared to spacer alone. No significant differences in graft loading were detected between the spacer alone and posterior dynamic system or between the posterior dynamic system and the titanium rod. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the posterior dynamic system provides similar fixation compared to that of a titanium rod, however, studies designed to evaluate the efficacy of fixation in a cadaver model may not be sufficiently powered to establish differences in load sharing using the techniques described here. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4382751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43827512015-06-30 Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device Cook, Daniel J. Yeager, Matthew S. Thampi, Shankar S. Whiting, Donald M. Cheng, Boyle C. Int J Spine Surg Articles BACKGROUND: Lumbar interbody fusion is a common treatment for a variety of spinal pathologies. It has been hypothesized that insufficient mechanical loading of the interbody graft can prevent proper fusion of the joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical stability and anterior column loading sharing characteristics of a posterior dynamic system compared to titanium rods in an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) model. METHODS: Range of motion, interpedicular kinematics and interbody graft loading were measured in human cadaveric lumbar segments tested under a pure moment flexibility testing protocol. RESULTS: Both systems provided significant fixation compared to the intact condition and to an interbody spacer alone in flexion extension and lateral bending. No significant differences in fixation were detected between the devices. A significant decrease in graft loading was detected in flexion for the titanium rod treatment compared to spacer alone. No significant differences in graft loading were detected between the spacer alone and posterior dynamic system or between the posterior dynamic system and the titanium rod. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the posterior dynamic system provides similar fixation compared to that of a titanium rod, however, studies designed to evaluate the efficacy of fixation in a cadaver model may not be sufficiently powered to establish differences in load sharing using the techniques described here. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2015-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4382751/ /pubmed/26131403 http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/2009 Text en Copyright © 2015 ISASS - This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Copyright © 2015 ISASS. |
spellingShingle | Articles Cook, Daniel J. Yeager, Matthew S. Thampi, Shankar S. Whiting, Donald M. Cheng, Boyle C. Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device |
title | Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device |
title_full | Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device |
title_fullStr | Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device |
title_full_unstemmed | Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device |
title_short | Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device |
title_sort | stability and load sharing characteristics of a posterior dynamic stabilization device |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4382751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26131403 http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/2009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cookdanielj stabilityandloadsharingcharacteristicsofaposteriordynamicstabilizationdevice AT yeagermatthews stabilityandloadsharingcharacteristicsofaposteriordynamicstabilizationdevice AT thampishankars stabilityandloadsharingcharacteristicsofaposteriordynamicstabilizationdevice AT whitingdonaldm stabilityandloadsharingcharacteristicsofaposteriordynamicstabilizationdevice AT chengboylec stabilityandloadsharingcharacteristicsofaposteriordynamicstabilizationdevice |