Cargando…

Is unilateral transversus abdominis plane block an analgesic alternative for ureteric shock wave lithotripsy?

BACKGROUND: Various sedative and analgesic techniques have been used during shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). AIM: This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of ultrasound-guided unilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block as an analgesic technique alternative during ureteric SWL. SETTINGS AND D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elnabtity, Ali Mohamed Ali, Tawfeek, Mohamed M., Keera, Amr Ali, Badran, Yasser Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4383112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886421
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.150177
_version_ 1782364680646295552
author Elnabtity, Ali Mohamed Ali
Tawfeek, Mohamed M.
Keera, Amr Ali
Badran, Yasser Ali
author_facet Elnabtity, Ali Mohamed Ali
Tawfeek, Mohamed M.
Keera, Amr Ali
Badran, Yasser Ali
author_sort Elnabtity, Ali Mohamed Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various sedative and analgesic techniques have been used during shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). AIM: This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of ultrasound-guided unilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block as an analgesic technique alternative during ureteric SWL. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective randomized comparative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled for ureteric SWL were randomly allocated into two equal groups: Group (F) received 1.5 mcg/kg fentanyl intravenous and group (T) received unilateral TAP block with injection of 25 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% (62.5 mg). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS program version 19 and EP16 program. RESULTS: The visual analog scale was significantly less in group (T) than in group (F) both intra-operatively (at 10, 20, 30, and 40 min) and postoperatively (at 10 min intervals in the postanesthesia care unit [PACU]) (P < 0.001). Rescue analgesia with pethidine during the procedure and in the PACU was less (P < 0.001) in the group (T) than group (F) with a median of 20 mg versus 55 mg, respectively. The higher sedation scores observed in group (F) at 15, 25, and 35 min during the procedure, and at 20 min during the PACU time were statistically highly significant (P < 0.001), but only significant at 10 min (P = 0.03) and 30 min (P = 0.007) during the PACU time. There was also highly significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the time of PACU stay in group (T) (38.2 ± 6.6 min) compared with group (F) (89.2 ± 13.39 min). We recorded 6 patients in group (F) (24%) who have developed respiratory depression (respiratory rate < 10 breaths/min) compared to 0% in group (T) (P = 0.022). In addition, in group (F) nausea was noted in 8 patients (32%) and vomiting in 6 patients (24%), which was statistically significant when compared to group (T) (0%) (P = 0.01 and 0.022, respectively). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided unilateral TAP block is an effective alternative analgesic technique during ureteric SWL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4383112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43831122015-04-13 Is unilateral transversus abdominis plane block an analgesic alternative for ureteric shock wave lithotripsy? Elnabtity, Ali Mohamed Ali Tawfeek, Mohamed M. Keera, Amr Ali Badran, Yasser Ali Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Various sedative and analgesic techniques have been used during shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). AIM: This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of ultrasound-guided unilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block as an analgesic technique alternative during ureteric SWL. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective randomized comparative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled for ureteric SWL were randomly allocated into two equal groups: Group (F) received 1.5 mcg/kg fentanyl intravenous and group (T) received unilateral TAP block with injection of 25 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% (62.5 mg). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS program version 19 and EP16 program. RESULTS: The visual analog scale was significantly less in group (T) than in group (F) both intra-operatively (at 10, 20, 30, and 40 min) and postoperatively (at 10 min intervals in the postanesthesia care unit [PACU]) (P < 0.001). Rescue analgesia with pethidine during the procedure and in the PACU was less (P < 0.001) in the group (T) than group (F) with a median of 20 mg versus 55 mg, respectively. The higher sedation scores observed in group (F) at 15, 25, and 35 min during the procedure, and at 20 min during the PACU time were statistically highly significant (P < 0.001), but only significant at 10 min (P = 0.03) and 30 min (P = 0.007) during the PACU time. There was also highly significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the time of PACU stay in group (T) (38.2 ± 6.6 min) compared with group (F) (89.2 ± 13.39 min). We recorded 6 patients in group (F) (24%) who have developed respiratory depression (respiratory rate < 10 breaths/min) compared to 0% in group (T) (P = 0.022). In addition, in group (F) nausea was noted in 8 patients (32%) and vomiting in 6 patients (24%), which was statistically significant when compared to group (T) (0%) (P = 0.01 and 0.022, respectively). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided unilateral TAP block is an effective alternative analgesic technique during ureteric SWL. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4383112/ /pubmed/25886421 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.150177 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Elnabtity, Ali Mohamed Ali
Tawfeek, Mohamed M.
Keera, Amr Ali
Badran, Yasser Ali
Is unilateral transversus abdominis plane block an analgesic alternative for ureteric shock wave lithotripsy?
title Is unilateral transversus abdominis plane block an analgesic alternative for ureteric shock wave lithotripsy?
title_full Is unilateral transversus abdominis plane block an analgesic alternative for ureteric shock wave lithotripsy?
title_fullStr Is unilateral transversus abdominis plane block an analgesic alternative for ureteric shock wave lithotripsy?
title_full_unstemmed Is unilateral transversus abdominis plane block an analgesic alternative for ureteric shock wave lithotripsy?
title_short Is unilateral transversus abdominis plane block an analgesic alternative for ureteric shock wave lithotripsy?
title_sort is unilateral transversus abdominis plane block an analgesic alternative for ureteric shock wave lithotripsy?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4383112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886421
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.150177
work_keys_str_mv AT elnabtityalimohamedali isunilateraltransversusabdominisplaneblockananalgesicalternativeforuretericshockwavelithotripsy
AT tawfeekmohamedm isunilateraltransversusabdominisplaneblockananalgesicalternativeforuretericshockwavelithotripsy
AT keeraamrali isunilateraltransversusabdominisplaneblockananalgesicalternativeforuretericshockwavelithotripsy
AT badranyasserali isunilateraltransversusabdominisplaneblockananalgesicalternativeforuretericshockwavelithotripsy