Cargando…

A randomized clinical study comparing spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective cesarean sections

BACKGROUND: To date, racemic bupivacaine is the most popular local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. With the introduction of levobupivacaine as pure S (–) enantiomer of bupivacaine which offers advantages of lower cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goyal, Ayesha, Shankaranarayan, P., Ganapathi, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4383120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886422
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.150169
_version_ 1782364682485497856
author Goyal, Ayesha
Shankaranarayan, P.
Ganapathi, P.
author_facet Goyal, Ayesha
Shankaranarayan, P.
Ganapathi, P.
author_sort Goyal, Ayesha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, racemic bupivacaine is the most popular local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. With the introduction of levobupivacaine as pure S (–) enantiomer of bupivacaine which offers advantages of lower cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity and shorter motor block duration, its use has widely increased in India. However, very few studies have been conducted about its efficacy in obstetric anesthesia. Thus, this study was undertaken to compare the sensorial, motor block levels, and side-effects of equal doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine and levobupivacaine with intrathecal fentanyl addition in elective cesarean cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval of College Ethical Committee, 30 parturient with American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II undergoing elective cesarean section were enrolled for study with their informed consent. They were randomly divided equally to either Group BF receiving 10 mg (2 ml) hyperbaric bupivacaine and 25 mcg (0.5 ml) fentanyl, or Group LF receiving 10 mg (2 ml) isobaric levobupivacaine and 25 mcg (0.5 ml) fentanyl. Sensory and motor block characteristics of the groups were assessed with pinprick, cold swab, and Bromage scale; observed hemodynamic changes and side-effects were recorded. Effects on the neonate were observed by APGAR score at 1 and 5 min and umbilical cord blood gas analysis. RESULTS: Hemodynamic parameters like mean arterial pressure of Group BF were found to be lower. Group BF exhibited maximum motor block level whereas in Group LF, max sensorial block level and postoperative visual analog scale scores were higher. Umbilical blood gas pCO(2) was slightly higher, and pO(2) was marginally lower in Group BF. Onset of motor block time, time to max motor block, time to T10 sensorial block, reversal of two dermatome, the first analgesic need were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine-fentanyl combination is a good alternative to hyperbaric bupivacaine-fentanyl combination in cesarean surgery as it is less effective in motor block, it maintains hemodynamic stability at higher sensorial block levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4383120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43831202015-04-13 A randomized clinical study comparing spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective cesarean sections Goyal, Ayesha Shankaranarayan, P. Ganapathi, P. Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To date, racemic bupivacaine is the most popular local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. With the introduction of levobupivacaine as pure S (–) enantiomer of bupivacaine which offers advantages of lower cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity and shorter motor block duration, its use has widely increased in India. However, very few studies have been conducted about its efficacy in obstetric anesthesia. Thus, this study was undertaken to compare the sensorial, motor block levels, and side-effects of equal doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine and levobupivacaine with intrathecal fentanyl addition in elective cesarean cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval of College Ethical Committee, 30 parturient with American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II undergoing elective cesarean section were enrolled for study with their informed consent. They were randomly divided equally to either Group BF receiving 10 mg (2 ml) hyperbaric bupivacaine and 25 mcg (0.5 ml) fentanyl, or Group LF receiving 10 mg (2 ml) isobaric levobupivacaine and 25 mcg (0.5 ml) fentanyl. Sensory and motor block characteristics of the groups were assessed with pinprick, cold swab, and Bromage scale; observed hemodynamic changes and side-effects were recorded. Effects on the neonate were observed by APGAR score at 1 and 5 min and umbilical cord blood gas analysis. RESULTS: Hemodynamic parameters like mean arterial pressure of Group BF were found to be lower. Group BF exhibited maximum motor block level whereas in Group LF, max sensorial block level and postoperative visual analog scale scores were higher. Umbilical blood gas pCO(2) was slightly higher, and pO(2) was marginally lower in Group BF. Onset of motor block time, time to max motor block, time to T10 sensorial block, reversal of two dermatome, the first analgesic need were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine-fentanyl combination is a good alternative to hyperbaric bupivacaine-fentanyl combination in cesarean surgery as it is less effective in motor block, it maintains hemodynamic stability at higher sensorial block levels. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4383120/ /pubmed/25886422 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.150169 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Goyal, Ayesha
Shankaranarayan, P.
Ganapathi, P.
A randomized clinical study comparing spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective cesarean sections
title A randomized clinical study comparing spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective cesarean sections
title_full A randomized clinical study comparing spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective cesarean sections
title_fullStr A randomized clinical study comparing spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective cesarean sections
title_full_unstemmed A randomized clinical study comparing spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective cesarean sections
title_short A randomized clinical study comparing spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective cesarean sections
title_sort randomized clinical study comparing spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective cesarean sections
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4383120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886422
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.150169
work_keys_str_mv AT goyalayesha arandomizedclinicalstudycomparingspinalanesthesiawithisobariclevobupivacainewithfentanylandhyperbaricbupivacainewithfentanylinelectivecesareansections
AT shankaranarayanp arandomizedclinicalstudycomparingspinalanesthesiawithisobariclevobupivacainewithfentanylandhyperbaricbupivacainewithfentanylinelectivecesareansections
AT ganapathip arandomizedclinicalstudycomparingspinalanesthesiawithisobariclevobupivacainewithfentanylandhyperbaricbupivacainewithfentanylinelectivecesareansections
AT goyalayesha randomizedclinicalstudycomparingspinalanesthesiawithisobariclevobupivacainewithfentanylandhyperbaricbupivacainewithfentanylinelectivecesareansections
AT shankaranarayanp randomizedclinicalstudycomparingspinalanesthesiawithisobariclevobupivacainewithfentanylandhyperbaricbupivacainewithfentanylinelectivecesareansections
AT ganapathip randomizedclinicalstudycomparingspinalanesthesiawithisobariclevobupivacainewithfentanylandhyperbaricbupivacainewithfentanylinelectivecesareansections