Cargando…

Rate of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking Redo in Private Practice: Risk Factors and Safety

Objective. To report the rate of progression of keratectasia after primary crosslinking (CXL) and evaluate the safety and efficiency of CXL redo. Materials and Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the patients who underwent CXL between 2010 and 2013 at the Beirut Eye Specialist Hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antoun, Joelle, Slim, Elise, el Hachem, Rami, Chelala, Elias, Jabbour, Elyse, Cherfan, Georges, Jarade, Elias F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4383466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25874118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/690961
_version_ 1782364740263084032
author Antoun, Joelle
Slim, Elise
el Hachem, Rami
Chelala, Elias
Jabbour, Elyse
Cherfan, Georges
Jarade, Elias F.
author_facet Antoun, Joelle
Slim, Elise
el Hachem, Rami
Chelala, Elias
Jabbour, Elyse
Cherfan, Georges
Jarade, Elias F.
author_sort Antoun, Joelle
collection PubMed
description Objective. To report the rate of progression of keratectasia after primary crosslinking (CXL) and evaluate the safety and efficiency of CXL redo. Materials and Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the patients who underwent CXL between 2010 and 2013 at the Beirut Eye Specialist Hospital, Lebanon. Progression of keratectasia was based on the presence of an increase in maximum keratometry of 1.00 D, a change in the map difference between two consecutive topographies of 1.00 D, a deterioration of visual acuity, or any change in the refraction. Primary and redo CXL were done using the same protocol. Results. Among the 221 eyes of 130 patients who underwent CXL, 7 eyes (3.17%) of five patients met the criteria of progression. All patients reported a history of allergic conjunctivitis and eye rubbing and progressed within 9 to 48 months. No complications were noted and all patients were stable 1 year after CXL redo. Conclusion. Allergic conjunctivitis and eye rubbing were the only risk factors associated with keratoconus progression after CXL. A close followup is thus mandatory, even years after the procedure. CXL redo seems to be a safe and efficient technique to halt the progression after a primary CXL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4383466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43834662015-04-13 Rate of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking Redo in Private Practice: Risk Factors and Safety Antoun, Joelle Slim, Elise el Hachem, Rami Chelala, Elias Jabbour, Elyse Cherfan, Georges Jarade, Elias F. J Ophthalmol Clinical Study Objective. To report the rate of progression of keratectasia after primary crosslinking (CXL) and evaluate the safety and efficiency of CXL redo. Materials and Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the patients who underwent CXL between 2010 and 2013 at the Beirut Eye Specialist Hospital, Lebanon. Progression of keratectasia was based on the presence of an increase in maximum keratometry of 1.00 D, a change in the map difference between two consecutive topographies of 1.00 D, a deterioration of visual acuity, or any change in the refraction. Primary and redo CXL were done using the same protocol. Results. Among the 221 eyes of 130 patients who underwent CXL, 7 eyes (3.17%) of five patients met the criteria of progression. All patients reported a history of allergic conjunctivitis and eye rubbing and progressed within 9 to 48 months. No complications were noted and all patients were stable 1 year after CXL redo. Conclusion. Allergic conjunctivitis and eye rubbing were the only risk factors associated with keratoconus progression after CXL. A close followup is thus mandatory, even years after the procedure. CXL redo seems to be a safe and efficient technique to halt the progression after a primary CXL. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4383466/ /pubmed/25874118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/690961 Text en Copyright © 2015 Joelle Antoun et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Antoun, Joelle
Slim, Elise
el Hachem, Rami
Chelala, Elias
Jabbour, Elyse
Cherfan, Georges
Jarade, Elias F.
Rate of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking Redo in Private Practice: Risk Factors and Safety
title Rate of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking Redo in Private Practice: Risk Factors and Safety
title_full Rate of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking Redo in Private Practice: Risk Factors and Safety
title_fullStr Rate of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking Redo in Private Practice: Risk Factors and Safety
title_full_unstemmed Rate of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking Redo in Private Practice: Risk Factors and Safety
title_short Rate of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking Redo in Private Practice: Risk Factors and Safety
title_sort rate of corneal collagen crosslinking redo in private practice: risk factors and safety
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4383466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25874118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/690961
work_keys_str_mv AT antounjoelle rateofcornealcollagencrosslinkingredoinprivatepracticeriskfactorsandsafety
AT slimelise rateofcornealcollagencrosslinkingredoinprivatepracticeriskfactorsandsafety
AT elhachemrami rateofcornealcollagencrosslinkingredoinprivatepracticeriskfactorsandsafety
AT chelalaelias rateofcornealcollagencrosslinkingredoinprivatepracticeriskfactorsandsafety
AT jabbourelyse rateofcornealcollagencrosslinkingredoinprivatepracticeriskfactorsandsafety
AT cherfangeorges rateofcornealcollagencrosslinkingredoinprivatepracticeriskfactorsandsafety
AT jaradeeliasf rateofcornealcollagencrosslinkingredoinprivatepracticeriskfactorsandsafety