Cargando…

Promising Perceptions, Divergent Practices and Barriers to Integrated Malaria Prevention in Wakiso District, Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends use of multiple approaches to control malaria. The integrated approach to malaria prevention advocates the use of several malaria prevention methods in a holistic manner. This study assessed perceptions and practices on integrated malaria preventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musoke, David, Miiro, George, Karani, George, Morris, Keith, Kasasa, Simon, Ndejjo, Rawlance, Nakiyingi-Miiro, Jessica, Guwatudde, David, Musoke, Miph Boses
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4383589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25837978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122699
_version_ 1782364769084243968
author Musoke, David
Miiro, George
Karani, George
Morris, Keith
Kasasa, Simon
Ndejjo, Rawlance
Nakiyingi-Miiro, Jessica
Guwatudde, David
Musoke, Miph Boses
author_facet Musoke, David
Miiro, George
Karani, George
Morris, Keith
Kasasa, Simon
Ndejjo, Rawlance
Nakiyingi-Miiro, Jessica
Guwatudde, David
Musoke, Miph Boses
author_sort Musoke, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends use of multiple approaches to control malaria. The integrated approach to malaria prevention advocates the use of several malaria prevention methods in a holistic manner. This study assessed perceptions and practices on integrated malaria prevention in Wakiso district, Uganda. METHODS: A clustered cross-sectional survey was conducted among 727 households from 29 villages using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Assessment was done on awareness of various malaria prevention methods, potential for use of the methods in a holistic manner, and reasons for dislike of certain methods. Households were classified as using integrated malaria prevention if they used at least two methods. Logistic regression was used to test for factors associated with the use of integrated malaria prevention while adjusting for clustering within villages. RESULTS: Participants knew of the various malaria prevention methods in the integrated approach including use of insecticide treated nets (97.5%), removing mosquito breeding sites (89.1%), clearing overgrown vegetation near houses (97.9%), and closing windows and doors early in the evenings (96.4%). If trained, most participants (68.6%) would use all the suggested malaria prevention methods of the integrated approach. Among those who would not use all methods, the main reasons given were there being too many (70.2%) and cost (32.0%). Only 33.0% households were using the integrated approach to prevent malaria. Use of integrated malaria prevention by households was associated with reading newspapers (AOR 0.34; 95% CI 0.22 –0.53) and ownership of a motorcycle/car (AOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.03 – 2.98). CONCLUSION: Although knowledge of malaria prevention methods was high and perceptions on the integrated approach promising, practices on integrated malaria prevention was relatively low. The use of the integrated approach can be improved by promoting use of multiple malaria prevention methods through various communication channels such as mass media.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4383589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43835892015-04-09 Promising Perceptions, Divergent Practices and Barriers to Integrated Malaria Prevention in Wakiso District, Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study Musoke, David Miiro, George Karani, George Morris, Keith Kasasa, Simon Ndejjo, Rawlance Nakiyingi-Miiro, Jessica Guwatudde, David Musoke, Miph Boses PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends use of multiple approaches to control malaria. The integrated approach to malaria prevention advocates the use of several malaria prevention methods in a holistic manner. This study assessed perceptions and practices on integrated malaria prevention in Wakiso district, Uganda. METHODS: A clustered cross-sectional survey was conducted among 727 households from 29 villages using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Assessment was done on awareness of various malaria prevention methods, potential for use of the methods in a holistic manner, and reasons for dislike of certain methods. Households were classified as using integrated malaria prevention if they used at least two methods. Logistic regression was used to test for factors associated with the use of integrated malaria prevention while adjusting for clustering within villages. RESULTS: Participants knew of the various malaria prevention methods in the integrated approach including use of insecticide treated nets (97.5%), removing mosquito breeding sites (89.1%), clearing overgrown vegetation near houses (97.9%), and closing windows and doors early in the evenings (96.4%). If trained, most participants (68.6%) would use all the suggested malaria prevention methods of the integrated approach. Among those who would not use all methods, the main reasons given were there being too many (70.2%) and cost (32.0%). Only 33.0% households were using the integrated approach to prevent malaria. Use of integrated malaria prevention by households was associated with reading newspapers (AOR 0.34; 95% CI 0.22 –0.53) and ownership of a motorcycle/car (AOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.03 – 2.98). CONCLUSION: Although knowledge of malaria prevention methods was high and perceptions on the integrated approach promising, practices on integrated malaria prevention was relatively low. The use of the integrated approach can be improved by promoting use of multiple malaria prevention methods through various communication channels such as mass media. Public Library of Science 2015-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4383589/ /pubmed/25837978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122699 Text en © 2015 Musoke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Musoke, David
Miiro, George
Karani, George
Morris, Keith
Kasasa, Simon
Ndejjo, Rawlance
Nakiyingi-Miiro, Jessica
Guwatudde, David
Musoke, Miph Boses
Promising Perceptions, Divergent Practices and Barriers to Integrated Malaria Prevention in Wakiso District, Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study
title Promising Perceptions, Divergent Practices and Barriers to Integrated Malaria Prevention in Wakiso District, Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study
title_full Promising Perceptions, Divergent Practices and Barriers to Integrated Malaria Prevention in Wakiso District, Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study
title_fullStr Promising Perceptions, Divergent Practices and Barriers to Integrated Malaria Prevention in Wakiso District, Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed Promising Perceptions, Divergent Practices and Barriers to Integrated Malaria Prevention in Wakiso District, Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study
title_short Promising Perceptions, Divergent Practices and Barriers to Integrated Malaria Prevention in Wakiso District, Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study
title_sort promising perceptions, divergent practices and barriers to integrated malaria prevention in wakiso district, uganda: a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4383589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25837978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122699
work_keys_str_mv AT musokedavid promisingperceptionsdivergentpracticesandbarrierstointegratedmalariapreventioninwakisodistrictugandaamixedmethodsstudy
AT miirogeorge promisingperceptionsdivergentpracticesandbarrierstointegratedmalariapreventioninwakisodistrictugandaamixedmethodsstudy
AT karanigeorge promisingperceptionsdivergentpracticesandbarrierstointegratedmalariapreventioninwakisodistrictugandaamixedmethodsstudy
AT morriskeith promisingperceptionsdivergentpracticesandbarrierstointegratedmalariapreventioninwakisodistrictugandaamixedmethodsstudy
AT kasasasimon promisingperceptionsdivergentpracticesandbarrierstointegratedmalariapreventioninwakisodistrictugandaamixedmethodsstudy
AT ndejjorawlance promisingperceptionsdivergentpracticesandbarrierstointegratedmalariapreventioninwakisodistrictugandaamixedmethodsstudy
AT nakiyingimiirojessica promisingperceptionsdivergentpracticesandbarrierstointegratedmalariapreventioninwakisodistrictugandaamixedmethodsstudy
AT guwatuddedavid promisingperceptionsdivergentpracticesandbarrierstointegratedmalariapreventioninwakisodistrictugandaamixedmethodsstudy
AT musokemiphboses promisingperceptionsdivergentpracticesandbarrierstointegratedmalariapreventioninwakisodistrictugandaamixedmethodsstudy