Cargando…

Phytogenic Compounds as Alternatives to In-Feed Antibiotics: Potentials and Challenges in Application

This article summarizes current experimental knowledge on the efficacy, possible mechanisms and feasibility in the application of phytogenic products as feed additives for food-producing animals. Phytogenic compounds comprise a wide range of plant-derived natural bioactive compounds and essential oi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Chengbo, Chowdhury, M .A. Kabir, Hou, Yongqing, Gong, Joshua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806623
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4010137
_version_ 1782364845251756032
author Yang, Chengbo
Chowdhury, M .A. Kabir
Hou, Yongqing
Gong, Joshua
author_facet Yang, Chengbo
Chowdhury, M .A. Kabir
Hou, Yongqing
Gong, Joshua
author_sort Yang, Chengbo
collection PubMed
description This article summarizes current experimental knowledge on the efficacy, possible mechanisms and feasibility in the application of phytogenic products as feed additives for food-producing animals. Phytogenic compounds comprise a wide range of plant-derived natural bioactive compounds and essential oils are a major group. Numerous studies have demonstrated that phytogenic compounds have a variety of functions, including antimicrobial/antiviral, antioxidative and anti-inflammation effects and improvement in the palatability of feed and gut development/health. However, the mechanisms underlying their functions are still largely unclear. In the past, there has been a lack of consistency in the results from both laboratory and field studies, largely due to the varied composition of products, dosages, purities and growing conditions of animals used. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of phytogenic compounds required for controlling enteric pathogens may not guarantee the best feed intake, balanced immunity of animals and cost-effectiveness in animal production. The lipophilic nature of photogenic compounds also presents a challenge in effective delivery to the animal gut and this can partially be resolved by microencapsulation and combination with other compounds (synergistic effect). Interestingly, the effects of photogenic compounds on anti-inflammation, gut chemosensing and possible disruption of bacterial quorum sensing could explain a certain number of studies with different animal species for the better production performance of animals that have received phytogenic feed additives. It is obvious that phytogenic compounds have good potential as an alternative to antibiotics in feed for food animal production and the combination of different phytogenic compounds appears to be an approach to improve the efficacy and safety of phytogenic compounds in the application. It is our expectation that the recent development of high-throughput and “omics” technologies can significantly advance the studies on the mechanisms underlying phytogenic compounds’ functions and, therefore, guide the effective use of the compounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4384076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43840762015-05-18 Phytogenic Compounds as Alternatives to In-Feed Antibiotics: Potentials and Challenges in Application Yang, Chengbo Chowdhury, M .A. Kabir Hou, Yongqing Gong, Joshua Pathogens Review This article summarizes current experimental knowledge on the efficacy, possible mechanisms and feasibility in the application of phytogenic products as feed additives for food-producing animals. Phytogenic compounds comprise a wide range of plant-derived natural bioactive compounds and essential oils are a major group. Numerous studies have demonstrated that phytogenic compounds have a variety of functions, including antimicrobial/antiviral, antioxidative and anti-inflammation effects and improvement in the palatability of feed and gut development/health. However, the mechanisms underlying their functions are still largely unclear. In the past, there has been a lack of consistency in the results from both laboratory and field studies, largely due to the varied composition of products, dosages, purities and growing conditions of animals used. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of phytogenic compounds required for controlling enteric pathogens may not guarantee the best feed intake, balanced immunity of animals and cost-effectiveness in animal production. The lipophilic nature of photogenic compounds also presents a challenge in effective delivery to the animal gut and this can partially be resolved by microencapsulation and combination with other compounds (synergistic effect). Interestingly, the effects of photogenic compounds on anti-inflammation, gut chemosensing and possible disruption of bacterial quorum sensing could explain a certain number of studies with different animal species for the better production performance of animals that have received phytogenic feed additives. It is obvious that phytogenic compounds have good potential as an alternative to antibiotics in feed for food animal production and the combination of different phytogenic compounds appears to be an approach to improve the efficacy and safety of phytogenic compounds in the application. It is our expectation that the recent development of high-throughput and “omics” technologies can significantly advance the studies on the mechanisms underlying phytogenic compounds’ functions and, therefore, guide the effective use of the compounds. MDPI 2015-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4384076/ /pubmed/25806623 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4010137 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Yang, Chengbo
Chowdhury, M .A. Kabir
Hou, Yongqing
Gong, Joshua
Phytogenic Compounds as Alternatives to In-Feed Antibiotics: Potentials and Challenges in Application
title Phytogenic Compounds as Alternatives to In-Feed Antibiotics: Potentials and Challenges in Application
title_full Phytogenic Compounds as Alternatives to In-Feed Antibiotics: Potentials and Challenges in Application
title_fullStr Phytogenic Compounds as Alternatives to In-Feed Antibiotics: Potentials and Challenges in Application
title_full_unstemmed Phytogenic Compounds as Alternatives to In-Feed Antibiotics: Potentials and Challenges in Application
title_short Phytogenic Compounds as Alternatives to In-Feed Antibiotics: Potentials and Challenges in Application
title_sort phytogenic compounds as alternatives to in-feed antibiotics: potentials and challenges in application
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806623
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4010137
work_keys_str_mv AT yangchengbo phytogeniccompoundsasalternativestoinfeedantibioticspotentialsandchallengesinapplication
AT chowdhurymakabir phytogeniccompoundsasalternativestoinfeedantibioticspotentialsandchallengesinapplication
AT houyongqing phytogeniccompoundsasalternativestoinfeedantibioticspotentialsandchallengesinapplication
AT gongjoshua phytogeniccompoundsasalternativestoinfeedantibioticspotentialsandchallengesinapplication