Cargando…

The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting – a pilot study

BACKGROUND: In preparing novice anesthesiologists to perform their first ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade, we hypothesized that virtual reality simulation-based training offers an additional learning benefit over standard training. We carried out pilot testing of this hypothesis u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Sullivan, Owen, Iohom, Gabriella, O’Donnell, Brian D, Shorten, George D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25844062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-110
_version_ 1782364871705231360
author O’Sullivan, Owen
Iohom, Gabriella
O’Donnell, Brian D
Shorten, George D
author_facet O’Sullivan, Owen
Iohom, Gabriella
O’Donnell, Brian D
Shorten, George D
author_sort O’Sullivan, Owen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In preparing novice anesthesiologists to perform their first ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade, we hypothesized that virtual reality simulation-based training offers an additional learning benefit over standard training. We carried out pilot testing of this hypothesis using a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: We planned to recruit 20 anesthesiologists who had no experience of performing ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Initial standardized training, reflecting current best available practice was provided to all participating trainees. Trainees were randomized into one of two groups; (i) to undertake additional simulation-based training or (ii) no further training. On completion of their assigned training, trainees attempted their first ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade. Two experts, blinded to the trainees’ group allocation, assessed the performance of trainees using validated tools. RESULTS: This study was discontinued following a planned interim analysis, having recruited 10 trainees. This occurred because it became clear that the functionality of the available simulator was insufficient to meet our training requirements. There were no statistically significant difference in clinical performance, as assessed using the sum of a Global Rating Score and a checklist score, between simulation-based training [mean 32.9 (standard deviation 11.1)] and control trainees [31.5 (4.2)] (p = 0.885). CONCLUSIONS: We have described a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of a simulator, during its development, by means of a randomized controlled trial. We believe that the learning acquired will be useful if performing future trials on learning efficacy associated with simulation based training in procedural skills. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01965314. Registered October 17th 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2253-14-110) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4384236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43842362015-04-04 The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting – a pilot study O’Sullivan, Owen Iohom, Gabriella O’Donnell, Brian D Shorten, George D BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: In preparing novice anesthesiologists to perform their first ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade, we hypothesized that virtual reality simulation-based training offers an additional learning benefit over standard training. We carried out pilot testing of this hypothesis using a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: We planned to recruit 20 anesthesiologists who had no experience of performing ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Initial standardized training, reflecting current best available practice was provided to all participating trainees. Trainees were randomized into one of two groups; (i) to undertake additional simulation-based training or (ii) no further training. On completion of their assigned training, trainees attempted their first ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade. Two experts, blinded to the trainees’ group allocation, assessed the performance of trainees using validated tools. RESULTS: This study was discontinued following a planned interim analysis, having recruited 10 trainees. This occurred because it became clear that the functionality of the available simulator was insufficient to meet our training requirements. There were no statistically significant difference in clinical performance, as assessed using the sum of a Global Rating Score and a checklist score, between simulation-based training [mean 32.9 (standard deviation 11.1)] and control trainees [31.5 (4.2)] (p = 0.885). CONCLUSIONS: We have described a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of a simulator, during its development, by means of a randomized controlled trial. We believe that the learning acquired will be useful if performing future trials on learning efficacy associated with simulation based training in procedural skills. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01965314. Registered October 17th 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2253-14-110) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4384236/ /pubmed/25844062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-110 Text en © O’Sullivan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
O’Sullivan, Owen
Iohom, Gabriella
O’Donnell, Brian D
Shorten, George D
The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting – a pilot study
title The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting – a pilot study
title_full The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting – a pilot study
title_fullStr The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting – a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting – a pilot study
title_short The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting – a pilot study
title_sort effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting – a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25844062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-110
work_keys_str_mv AT osullivanowen theeffectofsimulationbasedtrainingoninitialperformanceofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockadeinaclinicalsettingapilotstudy
AT iohomgabriella theeffectofsimulationbasedtrainingoninitialperformanceofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockadeinaclinicalsettingapilotstudy
AT odonnellbriand theeffectofsimulationbasedtrainingoninitialperformanceofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockadeinaclinicalsettingapilotstudy
AT shortengeorged theeffectofsimulationbasedtrainingoninitialperformanceofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockadeinaclinicalsettingapilotstudy
AT osullivanowen effectofsimulationbasedtrainingoninitialperformanceofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockadeinaclinicalsettingapilotstudy
AT iohomgabriella effectofsimulationbasedtrainingoninitialperformanceofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockadeinaclinicalsettingapilotstudy
AT odonnellbriand effectofsimulationbasedtrainingoninitialperformanceofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockadeinaclinicalsettingapilotstudy
AT shortengeorged effectofsimulationbasedtrainingoninitialperformanceofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockadeinaclinicalsettingapilotstudy