Cargando…
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’
Systematic review methods are developing rapidly, and most researchers would recognise their key methodological aspects, such as a closely focussed question, a comprehensive search, and a focus on synthesising ‘stronger’ rather than ‘weaker’ evidence. However, it may be helpful to question some of t...
Autor principal: | Petticrew, Mark |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25875303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0027-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
What Ever Happened to the Scientific Conversation?
por: Goldenring, James R.
Publicado: (2016) -
Commentary: What happens after the lockdown?
por: Jayadev, Chaitra, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
What Happens at Work Comes Home
por: Alrutz, Anna Stowe, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Rapid policy development for essential RMNCAH services in sub-Saharan Africa: what happened during the COVID-19 pandemic and what needs to happen going forward?
por: Waiswa, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
What's in Your Community?—Rethinking “CAP”
por: Thompson, George R, et al.
Publicado: (2023)