Cargando…
Recognizing acute delirium as part of your routine [RADAR]: a validation study
BACKGROUND: Although detection of delirium using the current tools is excellent in research settings, in routine clinical practice, this is not the case. Together with nursing staff, we developed a screening tool (RADAR) to address certain limitations of existing tools, notably administration time,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25844067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-015-0070-1 |
_version_ | 1782364884181188608 |
---|---|
author | Voyer, Philippe Champoux, Nathalie Desrosiers, Johanne Landreville, Philippe McCusker, Jane Monette, Johanne Savoie, Maryse Richard, Sylvie Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues |
author_facet | Voyer, Philippe Champoux, Nathalie Desrosiers, Johanne Landreville, Philippe McCusker, Jane Monette, Johanne Savoie, Maryse Richard, Sylvie Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues |
author_sort | Voyer, Philippe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although detection of delirium using the current tools is excellent in research settings, in routine clinical practice, this is not the case. Together with nursing staff, we developed a screening tool (RADAR) to address certain limitations of existing tools, notably administration time, ease-of-use and generalizability. The purpose of this study was not only to evaluate the validity and reliability of RADAR but also to gauge its acceptability among the nursing staff in two different clinical settings. METHODS: This was a validation study conducted on three units of an acute care hospital (medical, cardiology and coronary care) and five units of a long-term care facility. A total of 142 patients and 51 residents aged 65 and over, with or without dementia, participated in the study and 139 nurses were recruited and trained to use the RADAR tool. Data on each patient/resident was collected over a 12-hour period. The nursing staff and researchers administered RADAR during the scheduled distribution of medication. Researchers used the Confusion Assessment Method to determine the presence of delirium symptoms. Delirium itself was defined as meeting the criteria for DMS-IV-TR delirium. Inter-rater reliability, convergent, and concurrent validity of RADAR were assessed. At study end, 103 (74%) members of the nursing staff completed the RADAR feasibility and acceptability questionnaire. RESULTS: Percentages of agreement between RADAR items that bedside nurses administered and those research assistants administered varied from 82% to 98%. When compared with DSM-IV-TR criterion-defined delirium, RADAR had a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 67%. Participating nursing staff took about seven seconds on average, to complete the tool and it was very well received (≥98%) overall. CONCLUSIONS: The RADAR tool proved to be efficient, reliable, sensitive and very well accepted by nursing staff. Consequently, it becomes an appropriate new option for delirium screening among older adults, with or without cognitive impairment, in both hospitals and nursing homes. Further projects are currently underway to validate the RADAR among middle-aged adults, as well as in newer clinical settings; home care, emergency department, medical intensive care unit, and palliative care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12912-015-0070-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4384313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43843132015-04-04 Recognizing acute delirium as part of your routine [RADAR]: a validation study Voyer, Philippe Champoux, Nathalie Desrosiers, Johanne Landreville, Philippe McCusker, Jane Monette, Johanne Savoie, Maryse Richard, Sylvie Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: Although detection of delirium using the current tools is excellent in research settings, in routine clinical practice, this is not the case. Together with nursing staff, we developed a screening tool (RADAR) to address certain limitations of existing tools, notably administration time, ease-of-use and generalizability. The purpose of this study was not only to evaluate the validity and reliability of RADAR but also to gauge its acceptability among the nursing staff in two different clinical settings. METHODS: This was a validation study conducted on three units of an acute care hospital (medical, cardiology and coronary care) and five units of a long-term care facility. A total of 142 patients and 51 residents aged 65 and over, with or without dementia, participated in the study and 139 nurses were recruited and trained to use the RADAR tool. Data on each patient/resident was collected over a 12-hour period. The nursing staff and researchers administered RADAR during the scheduled distribution of medication. Researchers used the Confusion Assessment Method to determine the presence of delirium symptoms. Delirium itself was defined as meeting the criteria for DMS-IV-TR delirium. Inter-rater reliability, convergent, and concurrent validity of RADAR were assessed. At study end, 103 (74%) members of the nursing staff completed the RADAR feasibility and acceptability questionnaire. RESULTS: Percentages of agreement between RADAR items that bedside nurses administered and those research assistants administered varied from 82% to 98%. When compared with DSM-IV-TR criterion-defined delirium, RADAR had a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 67%. Participating nursing staff took about seven seconds on average, to complete the tool and it was very well received (≥98%) overall. CONCLUSIONS: The RADAR tool proved to be efficient, reliable, sensitive and very well accepted by nursing staff. Consequently, it becomes an appropriate new option for delirium screening among older adults, with or without cognitive impairment, in both hospitals and nursing homes. Further projects are currently underway to validate the RADAR among middle-aged adults, as well as in newer clinical settings; home care, emergency department, medical intensive care unit, and palliative care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12912-015-0070-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4384313/ /pubmed/25844067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-015-0070-1 Text en © Voyer et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Voyer, Philippe Champoux, Nathalie Desrosiers, Johanne Landreville, Philippe McCusker, Jane Monette, Johanne Savoie, Maryse Richard, Sylvie Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues Recognizing acute delirium as part of your routine [RADAR]: a validation study |
title | Recognizing acute delirium as part of your routine [RADAR]: a validation study |
title_full | Recognizing acute delirium as part of your routine [RADAR]: a validation study |
title_fullStr | Recognizing acute delirium as part of your routine [RADAR]: a validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Recognizing acute delirium as part of your routine [RADAR]: a validation study |
title_short | Recognizing acute delirium as part of your routine [RADAR]: a validation study |
title_sort | recognizing acute delirium as part of your routine [radar]: a validation study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25844067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-015-0070-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT voyerphilippe recognizingacutedeliriumaspartofyourroutineradaravalidationstudy AT champouxnathalie recognizingacutedeliriumaspartofyourroutineradaravalidationstudy AT desrosiersjohanne recognizingacutedeliriumaspartofyourroutineradaravalidationstudy AT landrevillephilippe recognizingacutedeliriumaspartofyourroutineradaravalidationstudy AT mccuskerjane recognizingacutedeliriumaspartofyourroutineradaravalidationstudy AT monettejohanne recognizingacutedeliriumaspartofyourroutineradaravalidationstudy AT savoiemaryse recognizingacutedeliriumaspartofyourroutineradaravalidationstudy AT richardsylvie recognizingacutedeliriumaspartofyourroutineradaravalidationstudy AT carmichaelpierrehugues recognizingacutedeliriumaspartofyourroutineradaravalidationstudy |