Cargando…
Candidate prioritization for low-abundant differentially expressed proteins in 2D-DIGE datasets
BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) provides a powerful technique to separate proteins on their isoelectric point and apparent molecular mass and quantify changes in protein expression. Abundantly available proteins in spots can be identified using mass spectrometr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25627479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0455-x |
_version_ | 1782364890497810432 |
---|---|
author | Nandal, Umesh K Vlietstra, Wytze J Byrman, Carsten Jeeninga, Rienk E Ringrose, Jeffrey H van Kampen, Antoine HC Speijer, Dave Moerland, Perry D |
author_facet | Nandal, Umesh K Vlietstra, Wytze J Byrman, Carsten Jeeninga, Rienk E Ringrose, Jeffrey H van Kampen, Antoine HC Speijer, Dave Moerland, Perry D |
author_sort | Nandal, Umesh K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) provides a powerful technique to separate proteins on their isoelectric point and apparent molecular mass and quantify changes in protein expression. Abundantly available proteins in spots can be identified using mass spectrometry-based approaches. However, identification is often not possible for low-abundant proteins. RESULTS: We present a novel computational approach to prioritize candidate proteins for unidentified spots. Our approach exploits noisy information on the isoelectric point and apparent molecular mass of a protein spot in combination with functional similarities of candidate proteins to already identified proteins to select and rank candidates. We evaluated our method on a 2D-DIGE dataset comparing protein expression in uninfected and HIV-1 infected T-cells. Using leave-one-out cross-validation, we show that the true-positive rate for the top-5 ranked proteins is 43.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach shows good performance on a 2D-DIGE dataset comparing protein expression in uninfected and HIV-1 infected T-cells. We expect our method to be highly useful in (re-)mining other 2D-DIGE experiments in which especially the low-abundant protein spots remain to be identified. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0455-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4384356 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43843562015-04-04 Candidate prioritization for low-abundant differentially expressed proteins in 2D-DIGE datasets Nandal, Umesh K Vlietstra, Wytze J Byrman, Carsten Jeeninga, Rienk E Ringrose, Jeffrey H van Kampen, Antoine HC Speijer, Dave Moerland, Perry D BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) provides a powerful technique to separate proteins on their isoelectric point and apparent molecular mass and quantify changes in protein expression. Abundantly available proteins in spots can be identified using mass spectrometry-based approaches. However, identification is often not possible for low-abundant proteins. RESULTS: We present a novel computational approach to prioritize candidate proteins for unidentified spots. Our approach exploits noisy information on the isoelectric point and apparent molecular mass of a protein spot in combination with functional similarities of candidate proteins to already identified proteins to select and rank candidates. We evaluated our method on a 2D-DIGE dataset comparing protein expression in uninfected and HIV-1 infected T-cells. Using leave-one-out cross-validation, we show that the true-positive rate for the top-5 ranked proteins is 43.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach shows good performance on a 2D-DIGE dataset comparing protein expression in uninfected and HIV-1 infected T-cells. We expect our method to be highly useful in (re-)mining other 2D-DIGE experiments in which especially the low-abundant protein spots remain to be identified. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0455-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4384356/ /pubmed/25627479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0455-x Text en © Nandal et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Nandal, Umesh K Vlietstra, Wytze J Byrman, Carsten Jeeninga, Rienk E Ringrose, Jeffrey H van Kampen, Antoine HC Speijer, Dave Moerland, Perry D Candidate prioritization for low-abundant differentially expressed proteins in 2D-DIGE datasets |
title | Candidate prioritization for low-abundant differentially expressed proteins in 2D-DIGE datasets |
title_full | Candidate prioritization for low-abundant differentially expressed proteins in 2D-DIGE datasets |
title_fullStr | Candidate prioritization for low-abundant differentially expressed proteins in 2D-DIGE datasets |
title_full_unstemmed | Candidate prioritization for low-abundant differentially expressed proteins in 2D-DIGE datasets |
title_short | Candidate prioritization for low-abundant differentially expressed proteins in 2D-DIGE datasets |
title_sort | candidate prioritization for low-abundant differentially expressed proteins in 2d-dige datasets |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25627479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0455-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nandalumeshk candidateprioritizationforlowabundantdifferentiallyexpressedproteinsin2ddigedatasets AT vlietstrawytzej candidateprioritizationforlowabundantdifferentiallyexpressedproteinsin2ddigedatasets AT byrmancarsten candidateprioritizationforlowabundantdifferentiallyexpressedproteinsin2ddigedatasets AT jeeningarienke candidateprioritizationforlowabundantdifferentiallyexpressedproteinsin2ddigedatasets AT ringrosejeffreyh candidateprioritizationforlowabundantdifferentiallyexpressedproteinsin2ddigedatasets AT vankampenantoinehc candidateprioritizationforlowabundantdifferentiallyexpressedproteinsin2ddigedatasets AT speijerdave candidateprioritizationforlowabundantdifferentiallyexpressedproteinsin2ddigedatasets AT moerlandperryd candidateprioritizationforlowabundantdifferentiallyexpressedproteinsin2ddigedatasets |