Cargando…

In vitro Comparison of Anti-Biofilm Effects against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Imipenem, Colistin, Tigecycline, Rifampicin and Combinations

BACKGROUND: Multi-drug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as one of the most important nosocomial pathogens. In addition to the diverse resistance mechanisms, some A. baumannii strains are known to have biofilm-producing capacity, thereby decreasing antibiotic effectiveness. MATERIA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Joon Young, Cheong, Hee Jin, Noh, Ji Yun, Kim, Woo Joo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases and Korean Society for Chemotherapy 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25844260
http://dx.doi.org/10.3947/ic.2015.47.1.27
_version_ 1782364904521465856
author Song, Joon Young
Cheong, Hee Jin
Noh, Ji Yun
Kim, Woo Joo
author_facet Song, Joon Young
Cheong, Hee Jin
Noh, Ji Yun
Kim, Woo Joo
author_sort Song, Joon Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multi-drug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as one of the most important nosocomial pathogens. In addition to the diverse resistance mechanisms, some A. baumannii strains are known to have biofilm-producing capacity, thereby decreasing antibiotic effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed to assess biofilm-producing capacity of three different MDR A. baumannii strains with diverse resistance mechanisms (OXA-51, IMP-1 and VIM-2 type β-lactamases), and intended to compare the effect of each antibiotic regimen (rifampicin, colistin, imipenem, tigecycline, rifampicin-imipenem and rifampicin-colistin) on mature A. baumannii biofilms using in vitro polystyrene plate biofilm assay. RESULTS: Among three MDR A. baumannii strains, only VIM-2 strain produced strong biofilm compared to the controls (optical density, 8.04 ± 2.16 vs. 0.49 ± 0.26). Regarding VIM-2 strains, none of imipenem, colistin and rifampicin reduced biofilm formation alone at MIC of each antibiotic agent (inhibition of biofilm synthesis, less than 30%). In comparison, tigecyclin (0.76 ± 0.23), imipenem-rifampicin (1.07 ± 0.31) and colistin-rifampicin (1.47 ± 0.54) showed a significant inhibition of biofilm synthesis compared to the positive controls at 48 hours after incubation (P<0.01). Tigecycline inhibited biofilm formation even at the one fourth level of MIC (1.17 ± 0.21). Likewise, both imipenem and colistin were also effective even with the reduced concentrations when those were combined with rifampicin. Such biofilm-inhibiting effects with those antibiotic regimens sustained up to 96 hours after incubation. CONCLUSION: Tigecycline, imipenem-rifampicin and colistin-rifampicin would be effective for the prevention or reduction of biofilm formation caused by A. baumannii strains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4384457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases and Korean Society for Chemotherapy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43844572015-04-03 In vitro Comparison of Anti-Biofilm Effects against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Imipenem, Colistin, Tigecycline, Rifampicin and Combinations Song, Joon Young Cheong, Hee Jin Noh, Ji Yun Kim, Woo Joo Infect Chemother Original Article BACKGROUND: Multi-drug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as one of the most important nosocomial pathogens. In addition to the diverse resistance mechanisms, some A. baumannii strains are known to have biofilm-producing capacity, thereby decreasing antibiotic effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed to assess biofilm-producing capacity of three different MDR A. baumannii strains with diverse resistance mechanisms (OXA-51, IMP-1 and VIM-2 type β-lactamases), and intended to compare the effect of each antibiotic regimen (rifampicin, colistin, imipenem, tigecycline, rifampicin-imipenem and rifampicin-colistin) on mature A. baumannii biofilms using in vitro polystyrene plate biofilm assay. RESULTS: Among three MDR A. baumannii strains, only VIM-2 strain produced strong biofilm compared to the controls (optical density, 8.04 ± 2.16 vs. 0.49 ± 0.26). Regarding VIM-2 strains, none of imipenem, colistin and rifampicin reduced biofilm formation alone at MIC of each antibiotic agent (inhibition of biofilm synthesis, less than 30%). In comparison, tigecyclin (0.76 ± 0.23), imipenem-rifampicin (1.07 ± 0.31) and colistin-rifampicin (1.47 ± 0.54) showed a significant inhibition of biofilm synthesis compared to the positive controls at 48 hours after incubation (P<0.01). Tigecycline inhibited biofilm formation even at the one fourth level of MIC (1.17 ± 0.21). Likewise, both imipenem and colistin were also effective even with the reduced concentrations when those were combined with rifampicin. Such biofilm-inhibiting effects with those antibiotic regimens sustained up to 96 hours after incubation. CONCLUSION: Tigecycline, imipenem-rifampicin and colistin-rifampicin would be effective for the prevention or reduction of biofilm formation caused by A. baumannii strains. The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases and Korean Society for Chemotherapy 2015-03 2015-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4384457/ /pubmed/25844260 http://dx.doi.org/10.3947/ic.2015.47.1.27 Text en Copyright © 2015 by The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases and Korean Society for Chemotherapy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Song, Joon Young
Cheong, Hee Jin
Noh, Ji Yun
Kim, Woo Joo
In vitro Comparison of Anti-Biofilm Effects against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Imipenem, Colistin, Tigecycline, Rifampicin and Combinations
title In vitro Comparison of Anti-Biofilm Effects against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Imipenem, Colistin, Tigecycline, Rifampicin and Combinations
title_full In vitro Comparison of Anti-Biofilm Effects against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Imipenem, Colistin, Tigecycline, Rifampicin and Combinations
title_fullStr In vitro Comparison of Anti-Biofilm Effects against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Imipenem, Colistin, Tigecycline, Rifampicin and Combinations
title_full_unstemmed In vitro Comparison of Anti-Biofilm Effects against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Imipenem, Colistin, Tigecycline, Rifampicin and Combinations
title_short In vitro Comparison of Anti-Biofilm Effects against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Imipenem, Colistin, Tigecycline, Rifampicin and Combinations
title_sort in vitro comparison of anti-biofilm effects against carbapenem-resistant acinetobacter baumannii: imipenem, colistin, tigecycline, rifampicin and combinations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25844260
http://dx.doi.org/10.3947/ic.2015.47.1.27
work_keys_str_mv AT songjoonyoung invitrocomparisonofantibiofilmeffectsagainstcarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumanniiimipenemcolistintigecyclinerifampicinandcombinations
AT cheongheejin invitrocomparisonofantibiofilmeffectsagainstcarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumanniiimipenemcolistintigecyclinerifampicinandcombinations
AT nohjiyun invitrocomparisonofantibiofilmeffectsagainstcarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumanniiimipenemcolistintigecyclinerifampicinandcombinations
AT kimwoojoo invitrocomparisonofantibiofilmeffectsagainstcarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumanniiimipenemcolistintigecyclinerifampicinandcombinations