Cargando…

Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) at the enamel-bonding interface of precoated and conventionally bonded brackets, utilizing standardized procedures. METHODS: The test sample consisted of 90 recently extracted bovine permane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guzman, Ulises A, Jerrold, Laurance, Vig, Peter S, Abdelkarim, Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24325904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-39
_version_ 1782364979506184192
author Guzman, Ulises A
Jerrold, Laurance
Vig, Peter S
Abdelkarim, Ahmad
author_facet Guzman, Ulises A
Jerrold, Laurance
Vig, Peter S
Abdelkarim, Ahmad
author_sort Guzman, Ulises A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) at the enamel-bonding interface of precoated and conventionally bonded brackets, utilizing standardized procedures. METHODS: The test sample consisted of 90 recently extracted bovine permanent mandibular incisors. The teeth were bonded using the same protocol and were tested in three different situations. A material testing systems machine was utilized for debonding, and the remaining adhesive on the tooth was recorded. RESULTS: Immediately after bonding, we found that the shear bond strength of the precoated brackets (6.27 MPa) was significantly higher than that of conventional brackets (5.37 MPa) (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences in bond strength were found between the two bracket systems after 24 h of bonding or after thermocycling. The conventional brackets had higher ARI scores than the precoated bracket systems immediately after bonding and after 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Since there were no significant differences in the bonding strength after 24 h, the immediate bonding strength of the precoated brackets during the first day does not appear to be a major advantage over the conventional bracket systems. However, less adhesive on the tooth after debonding is an advantage of precoated brackets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4384919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43849192015-04-04 Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets Guzman, Ulises A Jerrold, Laurance Vig, Peter S Abdelkarim, Ahmad Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) at the enamel-bonding interface of precoated and conventionally bonded brackets, utilizing standardized procedures. METHODS: The test sample consisted of 90 recently extracted bovine permanent mandibular incisors. The teeth were bonded using the same protocol and were tested in three different situations. A material testing systems machine was utilized for debonding, and the remaining adhesive on the tooth was recorded. RESULTS: Immediately after bonding, we found that the shear bond strength of the precoated brackets (6.27 MPa) was significantly higher than that of conventional brackets (5.37 MPa) (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences in bond strength were found between the two bracket systems after 24 h of bonding or after thermocycling. The conventional brackets had higher ARI scores than the precoated bracket systems immediately after bonding and after 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Since there were no significant differences in the bonding strength after 24 h, the immediate bonding strength of the precoated brackets during the first day does not appear to be a major advantage over the conventional bracket systems. However, less adhesive on the tooth after debonding is an advantage of precoated brackets. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4384919/ /pubmed/24325904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-39 Text en © Guzman et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Guzman, Ulises A
Jerrold, Laurance
Vig, Peter S
Abdelkarim, Ahmad
Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets
title Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets
title_full Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets
title_fullStr Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets
title_short Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets
title_sort comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24325904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-39
work_keys_str_mv AT guzmanulisesa comparisonofshearbondstrengthandadhesiveremnantindexbetweenprecoatedandconventionallybondedorthodonticbrackets
AT jerroldlaurance comparisonofshearbondstrengthandadhesiveremnantindexbetweenprecoatedandconventionallybondedorthodonticbrackets
AT vigpeters comparisonofshearbondstrengthandadhesiveremnantindexbetweenprecoatedandconventionallybondedorthodonticbrackets
AT abdelkarimahmad comparisonofshearbondstrengthandadhesiveremnantindexbetweenprecoatedandconventionallybondedorthodonticbrackets