Cargando…
Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) at the enamel-bonding interface of precoated and conventionally bonded brackets, utilizing standardized procedures. METHODS: The test sample consisted of 90 recently extracted bovine permane...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24325904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-39 |
_version_ | 1782364979506184192 |
---|---|
author | Guzman, Ulises A Jerrold, Laurance Vig, Peter S Abdelkarim, Ahmad |
author_facet | Guzman, Ulises A Jerrold, Laurance Vig, Peter S Abdelkarim, Ahmad |
author_sort | Guzman, Ulises A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) at the enamel-bonding interface of precoated and conventionally bonded brackets, utilizing standardized procedures. METHODS: The test sample consisted of 90 recently extracted bovine permanent mandibular incisors. The teeth were bonded using the same protocol and were tested in three different situations. A material testing systems machine was utilized for debonding, and the remaining adhesive on the tooth was recorded. RESULTS: Immediately after bonding, we found that the shear bond strength of the precoated brackets (6.27 MPa) was significantly higher than that of conventional brackets (5.37 MPa) (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences in bond strength were found between the two bracket systems after 24 h of bonding or after thermocycling. The conventional brackets had higher ARI scores than the precoated bracket systems immediately after bonding and after 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Since there were no significant differences in the bonding strength after 24 h, the immediate bonding strength of the precoated brackets during the first day does not appear to be a major advantage over the conventional bracket systems. However, less adhesive on the tooth after debonding is an advantage of precoated brackets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4384919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43849192015-04-04 Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets Guzman, Ulises A Jerrold, Laurance Vig, Peter S Abdelkarim, Ahmad Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) at the enamel-bonding interface of precoated and conventionally bonded brackets, utilizing standardized procedures. METHODS: The test sample consisted of 90 recently extracted bovine permanent mandibular incisors. The teeth were bonded using the same protocol and were tested in three different situations. A material testing systems machine was utilized for debonding, and the remaining adhesive on the tooth was recorded. RESULTS: Immediately after bonding, we found that the shear bond strength of the precoated brackets (6.27 MPa) was significantly higher than that of conventional brackets (5.37 MPa) (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences in bond strength were found between the two bracket systems after 24 h of bonding or after thermocycling. The conventional brackets had higher ARI scores than the precoated bracket systems immediately after bonding and after 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Since there were no significant differences in the bonding strength after 24 h, the immediate bonding strength of the precoated brackets during the first day does not appear to be a major advantage over the conventional bracket systems. However, less adhesive on the tooth after debonding is an advantage of precoated brackets. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4384919/ /pubmed/24325904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-39 Text en © Guzman et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Guzman, Ulises A Jerrold, Laurance Vig, Peter S Abdelkarim, Ahmad Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets |
title | Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets |
title_full | Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets |
title_fullStr | Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets |
title_short | Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets |
title_sort | comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24325904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-39 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guzmanulisesa comparisonofshearbondstrengthandadhesiveremnantindexbetweenprecoatedandconventionallybondedorthodonticbrackets AT jerroldlaurance comparisonofshearbondstrengthandadhesiveremnantindexbetweenprecoatedandconventionallybondedorthodonticbrackets AT vigpeters comparisonofshearbondstrengthandadhesiveremnantindexbetweenprecoatedandconventionallybondedorthodonticbrackets AT abdelkarimahmad comparisonofshearbondstrengthandadhesiveremnantindexbetweenprecoatedandconventionallybondedorthodonticbrackets |