Cargando…

Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect mucormycosis in biopsy and blood specimens

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare direct microscopic examination with culture and PCR for the diagnosis of Mucorales infection in blood and tissue specimens. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Blood samples and tissue specimens were obtained from 28 patients (total 58 samples) with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badiee, Parisa, Arastefar, Amir, Jafarian, Hadis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25848513
_version_ 1782365020001140736
author Badiee, Parisa
Arastefar, Amir
Jafarian, Hadis
author_facet Badiee, Parisa
Arastefar, Amir
Jafarian, Hadis
author_sort Badiee, Parisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare direct microscopic examination with culture and PCR for the diagnosis of Mucorales infection in blood and tissue specimens. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Blood samples and tissue specimens were obtained from 28 patients (total 58 samples) with suspected invasive fungal infection and cultured on proper media. Direct smear of tissue samples was done with potassium hydroxide, hematoxylin and eosin, and methenamine silver staining. DNA extracted from blood and tissue specimens were used for semi-nested PCR targeting 18S rDNA of Mucorales species. RESULTS: Mucormycosis was documented in 7/28 (25%) of tissue specimens with positive findings by direct smear, of which PCR and culture were positive in 6 (86%) and 5 (70%) specimens, respectively. The etiologic agents were Mucor spp. and Rhizopus spp. However, culture and PCR results for all blood specimens were negative. CONCLUSIONS: As the orders of Mucorales do not have well growth in culture media, PCR with tissue specimens is more sensitive than tissue or blood culture methods. Unfortunately, there is no alternative method for direct smear, which is an invasive method. Molecular methods may be helpful in these cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4385169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43851692015-04-06 Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect mucormycosis in biopsy and blood specimens Badiee, Parisa Arastefar, Amir Jafarian, Hadis Iran J Microbiol Medical Sciences BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare direct microscopic examination with culture and PCR for the diagnosis of Mucorales infection in blood and tissue specimens. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Blood samples and tissue specimens were obtained from 28 patients (total 58 samples) with suspected invasive fungal infection and cultured on proper media. Direct smear of tissue samples was done with potassium hydroxide, hematoxylin and eosin, and methenamine silver staining. DNA extracted from blood and tissue specimens were used for semi-nested PCR targeting 18S rDNA of Mucorales species. RESULTS: Mucormycosis was documented in 7/28 (25%) of tissue specimens with positive findings by direct smear, of which PCR and culture were positive in 6 (86%) and 5 (70%) specimens, respectively. The etiologic agents were Mucor spp. and Rhizopus spp. However, culture and PCR results for all blood specimens were negative. CONCLUSIONS: As the orders of Mucorales do not have well growth in culture media, PCR with tissue specimens is more sensitive than tissue or blood culture methods. Unfortunately, there is no alternative method for direct smear, which is an invasive method. Molecular methods may be helpful in these cases. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4385169/ /pubmed/25848513 Text en Copyright: © Iranian Journal of Microbiology & Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Medical Sciences
Badiee, Parisa
Arastefar, Amir
Jafarian, Hadis
Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect mucormycosis in biopsy and blood specimens
title Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect mucormycosis in biopsy and blood specimens
title_full Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect mucormycosis in biopsy and blood specimens
title_fullStr Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect mucormycosis in biopsy and blood specimens
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect mucormycosis in biopsy and blood specimens
title_short Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect mucormycosis in biopsy and blood specimens
title_sort comparison of histopathological analysis, culture and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect mucormycosis in biopsy and blood specimens
topic Medical Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25848513
work_keys_str_mv AT badieeparisa comparisonofhistopathologicalanalysiscultureandpolymerasechainreactionassaystodetectmucormycosisinbiopsyandbloodspecimens
AT arastefaramir comparisonofhistopathologicalanalysiscultureandpolymerasechainreactionassaystodetectmucormycosisinbiopsyandbloodspecimens
AT jafarianhadis comparisonofhistopathologicalanalysiscultureandpolymerasechainreactionassaystodetectmucormycosisinbiopsyandbloodspecimens