Cargando…
Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies
Different rabbit polyclonal antilymphocyte globulins (ATGs) are used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). We compared 2 different ATGs in alloHSCT after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for hematological malignancies. We re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25874131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/980924 |
_version_ | 1782365058330787840 |
---|---|
author | Paiano, Sandra Roosnek, Eddy Tirefort, Yordanka Nagy-Hulliger, Monika Masouridi, Stavroula Levrat, Emmanuel Bernimoulin, Michael Huguet, Saadia Casini, Alessandro Matthes, Thomas Samii, Kaveh Passweg, Jakob R. Chalandon, Yves |
author_facet | Paiano, Sandra Roosnek, Eddy Tirefort, Yordanka Nagy-Hulliger, Monika Masouridi, Stavroula Levrat, Emmanuel Bernimoulin, Michael Huguet, Saadia Casini, Alessandro Matthes, Thomas Samii, Kaveh Passweg, Jakob R. Chalandon, Yves |
author_sort | Paiano, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Different rabbit polyclonal antilymphocyte globulins (ATGs) are used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). We compared 2 different ATGs in alloHSCT after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for hematological malignancies. We reviewed 30 alloHSCT for hematologic malignancies performed between 2007 and 2010 with fludarabine and i.v. busulfan as conditioning regimen. Patients alternatingly received Thymoglobulin or ATG-F. Median followup was 3.3 (2.5–4.5) years. Adverse events appeared to occur more frequently during Thymoglobulin infusion than during ATG-F infusion but without statistical significance (P = 0.14). There were also no differences in 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse incidence, and transplant related mortality (TRM) in the Thymoglobulin versus ATG-F group: 45.7% versus 46.7%, 40% versus 33.7%, 40% versus 33.3%, and 20% versus 33.3%. The same held for graft failure, rejection, infectious complications, immune reconstitution, and acute or chronic GvHD. In patients transplanted for hematologic malignancies after RIC, the use of Thymoglobulin is comparable to that of ATG-F in all the aspects evaluated in the study. However due to the small number of patients in each group we cannot exclude a possible difference that may exist. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4385613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43856132015-04-13 Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies Paiano, Sandra Roosnek, Eddy Tirefort, Yordanka Nagy-Hulliger, Monika Masouridi, Stavroula Levrat, Emmanuel Bernimoulin, Michael Huguet, Saadia Casini, Alessandro Matthes, Thomas Samii, Kaveh Passweg, Jakob R. Chalandon, Yves Bone Marrow Res Clinical Study Different rabbit polyclonal antilymphocyte globulins (ATGs) are used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). We compared 2 different ATGs in alloHSCT after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for hematological malignancies. We reviewed 30 alloHSCT for hematologic malignancies performed between 2007 and 2010 with fludarabine and i.v. busulfan as conditioning regimen. Patients alternatingly received Thymoglobulin or ATG-F. Median followup was 3.3 (2.5–4.5) years. Adverse events appeared to occur more frequently during Thymoglobulin infusion than during ATG-F infusion but without statistical significance (P = 0.14). There were also no differences in 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse incidence, and transplant related mortality (TRM) in the Thymoglobulin versus ATG-F group: 45.7% versus 46.7%, 40% versus 33.7%, 40% versus 33.3%, and 20% versus 33.3%. The same held for graft failure, rejection, infectious complications, immune reconstitution, and acute or chronic GvHD. In patients transplanted for hematologic malignancies after RIC, the use of Thymoglobulin is comparable to that of ATG-F in all the aspects evaluated in the study. However due to the small number of patients in each group we cannot exclude a possible difference that may exist. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4385613/ /pubmed/25874131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/980924 Text en Copyright © 2015 Sandra Paiano et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Paiano, Sandra Roosnek, Eddy Tirefort, Yordanka Nagy-Hulliger, Monika Masouridi, Stavroula Levrat, Emmanuel Bernimoulin, Michael Huguet, Saadia Casini, Alessandro Matthes, Thomas Samii, Kaveh Passweg, Jakob R. Chalandon, Yves Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies |
title | Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies |
title_full | Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies |
title_fullStr | Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies |
title_short | Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies |
title_sort | comparing two types of rabbit atg prior to reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic sct for hematologic malignancies |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25874131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/980924 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paianosandra comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies AT roosnekeddy comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies AT tirefortyordanka comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies AT nagyhulligermonika comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies AT masouridistavroula comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies AT levratemmanuel comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies AT bernimoulinmichael comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies AT huguetsaadia comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies AT casinialessandro comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies AT matthesthomas comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies AT samiikaveh comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies AT passwegjakobr comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies AT chalandonyves comparingtwotypesofrabbitatgpriortoreducedintensityconditioningallogeneichematopoieticsctforhematologicmalignancies |