Cargando…

Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND: This study investigated procedural errors made during root canal preparation with nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 human mandibular molars were divided into five groups (n = 20) according...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guedes, Orlando Aguirre, da Costa, Marcus Vinícius Corrêa, Dorilêo, Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati, de Oliveira, Helder Fernandes, Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda, Bandeca, Matheus Coelho, Borges, Álvaro Henrique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25878475
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study investigated procedural errors made during root canal preparation with nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 human mandibular molars were divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the NiTi system used for root canal preparation: Group 1 - BioRaCe, Group 2 - K3, Group 3 - ProTaper, Group 4 - Mtwo and Group 5 - Hero Shaper. CBCT images were obtained to detect procedural errors made during root canal preparation. Two examiners evaluated the presence or absence of fractured instruments, perforations, and canal transportations. Chi-square test was used for statistical analyzes. The significance level was set at a=5%. RESULTS: In a total of 300 prepared root canals, 43 (14.33%) procedural errors were detected. Perforation was the procedural errors most commonly observed (58.14%). Most of the procedural errors were observed in the mesiobuccal root canal (48.84%). In the analysis of procedural errors, there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the groups of NiTi instruments. The root canals instrumented with BioRaCe had significantly less procedural errors. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT permitted the detection of procedural errors during root canal preparation. The frequency of procedural errors was low when root canals preparation was accomplished with BioRaCe system.