Cargando…
Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
BACKGROUND: This study investigated procedural errors made during root canal preparation with nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 human mandibular molars were divided into five groups (n = 20) according...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25878475 |
_version_ | 1782365080534384640 |
---|---|
author | Guedes, Orlando Aguirre da Costa, Marcus Vinícius Corrêa Dorilêo, Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati de Oliveira, Helder Fernandes Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda Bandeca, Matheus Coelho Borges, Álvaro Henrique |
author_facet | Guedes, Orlando Aguirre da Costa, Marcus Vinícius Corrêa Dorilêo, Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati de Oliveira, Helder Fernandes Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda Bandeca, Matheus Coelho Borges, Álvaro Henrique |
author_sort | Guedes, Orlando Aguirre |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study investigated procedural errors made during root canal preparation with nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 human mandibular molars were divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the NiTi system used for root canal preparation: Group 1 - BioRaCe, Group 2 - K3, Group 3 - ProTaper, Group 4 - Mtwo and Group 5 - Hero Shaper. CBCT images were obtained to detect procedural errors made during root canal preparation. Two examiners evaluated the presence or absence of fractured instruments, perforations, and canal transportations. Chi-square test was used for statistical analyzes. The significance level was set at a=5%. RESULTS: In a total of 300 prepared root canals, 43 (14.33%) procedural errors were detected. Perforation was the procedural errors most commonly observed (58.14%). Most of the procedural errors were observed in the mesiobuccal root canal (48.84%). In the analysis of procedural errors, there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the groups of NiTi instruments. The root canals instrumented with BioRaCe had significantly less procedural errors. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT permitted the detection of procedural errors during root canal preparation. The frequency of procedural errors was low when root canals preparation was accomplished with BioRaCe system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4385722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43857222015-05-01 Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Guedes, Orlando Aguirre da Costa, Marcus Vinícius Corrêa Dorilêo, Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati de Oliveira, Helder Fernandes Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda Bandeca, Matheus Coelho Borges, Álvaro Henrique J Int Oral Health Original Research BACKGROUND: This study investigated procedural errors made during root canal preparation with nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 human mandibular molars were divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the NiTi system used for root canal preparation: Group 1 - BioRaCe, Group 2 - K3, Group 3 - ProTaper, Group 4 - Mtwo and Group 5 - Hero Shaper. CBCT images were obtained to detect procedural errors made during root canal preparation. Two examiners evaluated the presence or absence of fractured instruments, perforations, and canal transportations. Chi-square test was used for statistical analyzes. The significance level was set at a=5%. RESULTS: In a total of 300 prepared root canals, 43 (14.33%) procedural errors were detected. Perforation was the procedural errors most commonly observed (58.14%). Most of the procedural errors were observed in the mesiobuccal root canal (48.84%). In the analysis of procedural errors, there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the groups of NiTi instruments. The root canals instrumented with BioRaCe had significantly less procedural errors. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT permitted the detection of procedural errors during root canal preparation. The frequency of procedural errors was low when root canals preparation was accomplished with BioRaCe system. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4385722/ /pubmed/25878475 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Guedes, Orlando Aguirre da Costa, Marcus Vinícius Corrêa Dorilêo, Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati de Oliveira, Helder Fernandes Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda Bandeca, Matheus Coelho Borges, Álvaro Henrique Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography |
title | Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography |
title_full | Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography |
title_fullStr | Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography |
title_short | Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography |
title_sort | detection of procedural errors during root canal instrumentation using cone beam computed tomography |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25878475 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guedesorlandoaguirre detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT dacostamarcusviniciuscorrea detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT dorileomauracristianegoncalesorcati detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT deoliveirahelderfernandes detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT pedrofabioluismiranda detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT bandecamatheuscoelho detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT borgesalvarohenrique detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography |