Cargando…

Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND: This study investigated procedural errors made during root canal preparation with nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 human mandibular molars were divided into five groups (n = 20) according...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guedes, Orlando Aguirre, da Costa, Marcus Vinícius Corrêa, Dorilêo, Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati, de Oliveira, Helder Fernandes, Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda, Bandeca, Matheus Coelho, Borges, Álvaro Henrique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25878475
_version_ 1782365080534384640
author Guedes, Orlando Aguirre
da Costa, Marcus Vinícius Corrêa
Dorilêo, Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati
de Oliveira, Helder Fernandes
Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda
Bandeca, Matheus Coelho
Borges, Álvaro Henrique
author_facet Guedes, Orlando Aguirre
da Costa, Marcus Vinícius Corrêa
Dorilêo, Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati
de Oliveira, Helder Fernandes
Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda
Bandeca, Matheus Coelho
Borges, Álvaro Henrique
author_sort Guedes, Orlando Aguirre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study investigated procedural errors made during root canal preparation with nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 human mandibular molars were divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the NiTi system used for root canal preparation: Group 1 - BioRaCe, Group 2 - K3, Group 3 - ProTaper, Group 4 - Mtwo and Group 5 - Hero Shaper. CBCT images were obtained to detect procedural errors made during root canal preparation. Two examiners evaluated the presence or absence of fractured instruments, perforations, and canal transportations. Chi-square test was used for statistical analyzes. The significance level was set at a=5%. RESULTS: In a total of 300 prepared root canals, 43 (14.33%) procedural errors were detected. Perforation was the procedural errors most commonly observed (58.14%). Most of the procedural errors were observed in the mesiobuccal root canal (48.84%). In the analysis of procedural errors, there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the groups of NiTi instruments. The root canals instrumented with BioRaCe had significantly less procedural errors. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT permitted the detection of procedural errors during root canal preparation. The frequency of procedural errors was low when root canals preparation was accomplished with BioRaCe system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4385722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43857222015-05-01 Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Guedes, Orlando Aguirre da Costa, Marcus Vinícius Corrêa Dorilêo, Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati de Oliveira, Helder Fernandes Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda Bandeca, Matheus Coelho Borges, Álvaro Henrique J Int Oral Health Original Research BACKGROUND: This study investigated procedural errors made during root canal preparation with nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 human mandibular molars were divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the NiTi system used for root canal preparation: Group 1 - BioRaCe, Group 2 - K3, Group 3 - ProTaper, Group 4 - Mtwo and Group 5 - Hero Shaper. CBCT images were obtained to detect procedural errors made during root canal preparation. Two examiners evaluated the presence or absence of fractured instruments, perforations, and canal transportations. Chi-square test was used for statistical analyzes. The significance level was set at a=5%. RESULTS: In a total of 300 prepared root canals, 43 (14.33%) procedural errors were detected. Perforation was the procedural errors most commonly observed (58.14%). Most of the procedural errors were observed in the mesiobuccal root canal (48.84%). In the analysis of procedural errors, there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the groups of NiTi instruments. The root canals instrumented with BioRaCe had significantly less procedural errors. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT permitted the detection of procedural errors during root canal preparation. The frequency of procedural errors was low when root canals preparation was accomplished with BioRaCe system. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4385722/ /pubmed/25878475 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Guedes, Orlando Aguirre
da Costa, Marcus Vinícius Corrêa
Dorilêo, Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati
de Oliveira, Helder Fernandes
Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda
Bandeca, Matheus Coelho
Borges, Álvaro Henrique
Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
title Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
title_full Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
title_short Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
title_sort detection of procedural errors during root canal instrumentation using cone beam computed tomography
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25878475
work_keys_str_mv AT guedesorlandoaguirre detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT dacostamarcusviniciuscorrea detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT dorileomauracristianegoncalesorcati detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT deoliveirahelderfernandes detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT pedrofabioluismiranda detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT bandecamatheuscoelho detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT borgesalvarohenrique detectionofproceduralerrorsduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingconebeamcomputedtomography