Cargando…
The relative length of the patient and the primary care interval in patients with 28 common and rarer cancers
BACKGROUND: Appreciating variation in the length of pre- or post-presentation diagnostic intervals can help prioritise early diagnosis interventions with either a community or a primary care focus. METHODS: We analysed data from the first English National Audit of Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25734380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.40 |
_version_ | 1782365119166021632 |
---|---|
author | Lyratzopoulos, G Saunders, C L Abel, G A McPhail, S Neal, R D Wardle, J Rubin, G P |
author_facet | Lyratzopoulos, G Saunders, C L Abel, G A McPhail, S Neal, R D Wardle, J Rubin, G P |
author_sort | Lyratzopoulos, G |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Appreciating variation in the length of pre- or post-presentation diagnostic intervals can help prioritise early diagnosis interventions with either a community or a primary care focus. METHODS: We analysed data from the first English National Audit of Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care on 10 953 patients with any of 28 cancers. We calculated summary statistics for the length of the patient and the primary care interval and their ratio, by cancer site. RESULTS: Interval lengths varied greatly by cancer. Laryngeal and oropharyngeal cancers had the longest median patient intervals, whereas renal and bladder cancer had the shortest (34.5 and 30 compared with 3 and 2 days, respectively). Multiple myeloma and gallbladder cancer had the longest median primary care intervals, and melanoma and breast cancer had the shortest (20.5 and 20 compared with 0 and 0 days, respectively). Mean patient intervals were longer than primary care intervals for most (18 of 28) cancers, and notably so (two- to five-fold greater) for 10 cancers (breast, melanoma, testicular, vulval, cervical, endometrial, oropharyngeal, laryngeal, ovarian and thyroid). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the continuing development and evaluation of public health interventions aimed at shortening patient intervals, particularly for cancers with long patient interval and/or high patient interval over primary care interval ratio. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4385974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43859742015-04-07 The relative length of the patient and the primary care interval in patients with 28 common and rarer cancers Lyratzopoulos, G Saunders, C L Abel, G A McPhail, S Neal, R D Wardle, J Rubin, G P Br J Cancer Full Paper BACKGROUND: Appreciating variation in the length of pre- or post-presentation diagnostic intervals can help prioritise early diagnosis interventions with either a community or a primary care focus. METHODS: We analysed data from the first English National Audit of Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care on 10 953 patients with any of 28 cancers. We calculated summary statistics for the length of the patient and the primary care interval and their ratio, by cancer site. RESULTS: Interval lengths varied greatly by cancer. Laryngeal and oropharyngeal cancers had the longest median patient intervals, whereas renal and bladder cancer had the shortest (34.5 and 30 compared with 3 and 2 days, respectively). Multiple myeloma and gallbladder cancer had the longest median primary care intervals, and melanoma and breast cancer had the shortest (20.5 and 20 compared with 0 and 0 days, respectively). Mean patient intervals were longer than primary care intervals for most (18 of 28) cancers, and notably so (two- to five-fold greater) for 10 cancers (breast, melanoma, testicular, vulval, cervical, endometrial, oropharyngeal, laryngeal, ovarian and thyroid). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the continuing development and evaluation of public health interventions aimed at shortening patient intervals, particularly for cancers with long patient interval and/or high patient interval over primary care interval ratio. Nature Publishing Group 2015-03-31 2015-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4385974/ /pubmed/25734380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.40 Text en Copyright © 2015 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Full Paper Lyratzopoulos, G Saunders, C L Abel, G A McPhail, S Neal, R D Wardle, J Rubin, G P The relative length of the patient and the primary care interval in patients with 28 common and rarer cancers |
title | The relative length of the patient and the primary care interval in patients with 28 common and rarer cancers |
title_full | The relative length of the patient and the primary care interval in patients with 28 common and rarer cancers |
title_fullStr | The relative length of the patient and the primary care interval in patients with 28 common and rarer cancers |
title_full_unstemmed | The relative length of the patient and the primary care interval in patients with 28 common and rarer cancers |
title_short | The relative length of the patient and the primary care interval in patients with 28 common and rarer cancers |
title_sort | relative length of the patient and the primary care interval in patients with 28 common and rarer cancers |
topic | Full Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25734380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lyratzopoulosg therelativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT saunderscl therelativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT abelga therelativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT mcphails therelativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT nealrd therelativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT wardlej therelativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT rubingp therelativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT lyratzopoulosg relativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT saunderscl relativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT abelga relativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT mcphails relativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT nealrd relativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT wardlej relativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers AT rubingp relativelengthofthepatientandtheprimarycareintervalinpatientswith28commonandrarercancers |