Cargando…
Texture analysis on the edge-enhanced fluence of VMAT
BACKGROUND: Textural features of edge-enhanced fluence were analysed to quantify modulation degree of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. METHODS: Twenty prostate and twenty head and neck VMAT plans were retrospectively selected. Fluences of VMAT plans were generated by integration of mon...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4386104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0382-z |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Textural features of edge-enhanced fluence were analysed to quantify modulation degree of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. METHODS: Twenty prostate and twenty head and neck VMAT plans were retrospectively selected. Fluences of VMAT plans were generated by integration of monitor units shaped by multi-leaf collimators (MLCs) at each control point. When generating fluences, the values of pixels representing MLC tips were doubled to prevent smearing out of small or irregular fields (edge-enhancement). Six kinds of textural features, including angular second moment, inverse difference moment, contrast, variance, correlation and entropy, were calculated with particular displacement distances (d) of 1, 5 and 10. Plan delivery accuracy was evaluated by gamma-index method, mechanical parameter differences between plan and delivery and differences in dose-volumetric parameters between plan and delivery. Spearman’s correlation coefficients (r(s)) were calculated between the values of textural features and VMAT delivery accuracy. RESULTS: The r(s) values of contrast (d = 1) with edge-enhancement to global gamma passing rates with 2%/2 mm, 1%/2 mm and 2%/1 mm were 0.546 (p < 0.001), 0.744 (p < 0.001) and 0.487 (p = 0.001), respectively. Those with local 2%/2 mm, 1%/2 mm and 2%/1 mm were 0.588, 0.640 and 0.644, respectively (all with p < 0.001). The r(s) values of contrast (d = 1) to MLC and gantry angle errors were -0.853 and 0.655, respectively (all with p < 0.001). The contrast (d = 1) showed statistically significant r(s) values in 11 dose-volumetric parameter differences from a total of 35 cases, and generally showed better correlations to plan delivery accuracy than did previously suggested textural features with non-edge-enhanced fluences, as well as conventional modulation indices. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast (d = 1) with edge-enhanced fluences could be used as modulation index for VMAT. |
---|